Impact of humeral stem length on calcar resorption in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Vegas, Austin [1 ]
Cannon, Dylan [2 ]
Lewis, Steven [3 ]
Glener, Julie [3 ]
Mekkawy, Kevin L. [3 ]
Rodriguez, Hugo C. [1 ]
Schodlbauer, Daniel F. [4 ]
Levy, Jonathan C. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Larkin Community Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, South Miami, FL USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[3] Holy Cross Orthoped Inst, Ft Lauderdale, FL USA
[4] Paley Orthoped & Spine Inst, Levy Shoulder Ctr, Boca Raton, FL USA
[5] Paley Orthoped & Spine Inst, Levy Shoulder Ctr, 9960 N Centeral Pk Blvd,Suite150A, Boca Raton, FL 33428 USA
关键词
Radiographic outcomes; total shoulder arthroplasty; canal-sparing; stress shielding; calcar resorption; bone adaptation; BONE-RESORPTION; HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; COMPLICATIONS; INFECTION; COMPONENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.033
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Use of standard-length anatomic total shoulder (TSA) humeral stems has been associated with high rates of medial calcar bone loss. Calcar bone loss has been attributed to stress shielding, debris-induced osteolysis, and undiagnosed infection. Short stem and canal-sparing humeral components may provide more optimal stress distribution and thus lower rates of calcar bone loss related to stress shielding. The purpose of this study is to determine whether implant length will affect the rate and severity of medial calcar resorption.Methods: A retrospective review was performed on TSA patients treated with three different-length humeral implants (canal-sparing, short, and standard-length designs). Patients were matched 1:1:1 based on both gender and age (+/- 4 years), resulting in 40 patients per cohort. Radiographic changes in medial calcar bone were evaluated and graded on a 4-point scale, from the initial postoperative radiographs to those at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.Results: The presence of any degree of medial calcar resorption demonstrated an overall rate of 73.3% at one year. At 3 months, calcar resorption was observed in 20% of the canal-sparing cohort, while the short and standard designs demonstrated resorption in 55% and 52.5%, respectively (P = .002). At 12 months, calcar resorption was seen in 65% of the canal-sparing design, while both the short and standard designs had a 77.5% rate of resorption (P = .345). The severity of calcar resorption for the canal-sparing cohort was significantly lower at all time points when compared to the short stem (3 months, P = .004; 6 months, P = .003; 12 months, P = .004) and at 3Conclusion: Patients treated with canal-sparing TSA humeral components have significantly lower rates of early calcar resorption with less severe bone loss when compared to patients treated using short and standard-length designs.(c) 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 138
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcomes of an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a contralateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Cox, Ryan M.
    Padegimas, Eric M.
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    Getz, Charles L.
    Lazarus, Mark D.
    Ramsey, Matthew L.
    Williams, Gerald R., Jr.
    Horneff, John G., III
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (06) : 998 - 1003
  • [22] Using standard-length compactors to implant short humeral stems in total shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaver study of humeral stem alignment
    Gunst, Stanislas
    Nigues, Ana
    Vogels, Jerome
    Servien, Elvire
    Lustig, Sebastien
    Nove-Josserand, Laurent
    Collotte, Philippe
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (05):
  • [23] Instability and the Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Seidl, Adam J.
    Daniels, Stephen D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2025, 33 (02) : e72 - e80
  • [24] Survivorship of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Piper, Christine
    Neviaser, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (10) : 457 - 465
  • [25] UCLA ANATOMIC TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY
    AMSTUTZ, HC
    HOY, ALS
    CLARKE, IC
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1981, (155) : 7 - 20
  • [26] Bilateral Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Latif, Vaqar
    Denard, Patrick J.
    Young, Allan A.
    Liotard, Jean-Pierre
    Walch, Gilles
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (04) : E479 - E485
  • [27] Salvage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort
    Otte, R. Stephen
    Naylor, Amanda J.
    Blanchard, Kassandra N.
    Cancienne, Jourdan M.
    Chan, William
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Garrigues, Grant E.
    Nicholson, Gregory P.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (07) : s134 - s138
  • [28] Revision of failed hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Sheth, Mihir M.
    Sholder, Daniel
    Getz, Charles L.
    Williams, Gerald R.
    Namdari, Surena
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (06) : 1074 - 1081
  • [29] Stemless Humeral Implants in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Brabston, Eugene W.
    Fehringer, Edward V.
    Owen, Matthew T.
    Ponce, Brent A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2020, 28 (07) : E277 - E287
  • [30] Pain After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Okoroha, Kelechi R.
    Patel, Ravi B.
    Jildeh, Toufic R.
    Sanchez, Nathaniel
    Sweet, Matthew C.
    Rill, Brian K.
    Kolowich, Patricia A.
    Muh, Stephanie J.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2019, 42 (02) : E247 - E252