(Overcoming) Maternity Bias in the Workplace: A Systematic Review

被引:26
|
作者
Arena, David F., Jr. [1 ]
Volpone, Sabrina D. [2 ]
Jones, Kristen P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO USA
[3] Univ Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
关键词
maternity; working mothers; maternity bias; pregnancy; systematic review; motherhood; WORK-LIFE BALANCE; BENEVOLENT SEXISM; DISCRIMINATION; STIGMA; JOB; HOSTILE;
D O I
10.1177/01492063221086243
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Maternity, a period of transition beginning with prenatal bodily changes and progressing through postnatal lactation, is experienced by up to 66% of working women. Over the past several decades, research on maternity in the workplace has grown exponentially to reveal salient maternity biases that plague women as they navigate their employee and motherhood identities. With the aim of providing information that aids scholars and practitioners in better understanding the experiences of working mothers, we conducted a systematic review of 239 papers on maternity bias (i.e., formal, interpersonal, and internalized). Our interdisciplinary review discusses these three forms of bias and how they might present across different career stages for working mothers. Additionally, we review the antecedents that may drive maternity bias and the outcomes that result for working mothers who perceive or anticipate bias at work. Finally, we discuss areas of previous research aimed at overcoming maternity bias from the perspective of working mothers, their colleagues, and their organization. We conclude by discussing the trends brought to light in our review, the collective strengths and weaknesses of commonly adopted theoretical perspectives of the research reviewed, implications for combating maternity bias for women and their organizations, and recommendations for future research. Our model of maternity bias comprehensively reviews past work to provide insights into the bias that working mothers endure at work but also provides a path forward, as better understanding these biases empower organizations, coworkers, and employees to remediate maternity bias.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 84
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evidence of Workplace Interventions-A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
    Pieper, Claudia
    Schroer, Sarah
    Eilerts, Anna-Lisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (19)
  • [22] Mindfulness and intergroup bias: A systematic review
    Oyler, Danielle L.
    Price-Blackshear, Mollie A.
    Pratscher, Steven D.
    Bettencourt, B. Ann
    GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2022, 25 (04) : 1107 - 1138
  • [23] Cardiovascular load assessment in the workplace: A systematic review
    Dias, Mariana
    Silva, Luis
    Folgado, Duarte
    Nunes, Maria Lua
    Cepeda, Catia
    Cheetham, Marcus
    Gamboa, Hugo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2023, 96
  • [24] A systematic literature review on persuasive technology at the workplace
    Wenker, Kilian
    PATTERNS, 2022, 3 (08):
  • [25] Overcoming catalytic bias
    Daesung Lee
    Nature, 2011, 471 : 452 - 453
  • [26] Overcoming Specialty Bias
    Sherman, Karen L.
    Wayne, Jeffrey D.
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2013, 148 (07) : 640 - 640
  • [27] Overcoming Bias Response
    Dr Jones
    AMERICAN SCIENTIST, 2012, 100 (01) : 5 - 5
  • [28] A systematic review of information technology in workplace learning
    Yu, Wenhao
    He, Jiaqi
    Gong, Yuanyuan
    PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2023, 60 (12) : 4904 - 4929
  • [29] LGBTQ plus in workplace: a systematic review and reconsideration
    Maji, Sucharita
    Yadav, Nidhi
    Gupta, Pranjal
    EQUALITY DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION, 2024, 43 (02): : 313 - 360
  • [30] Disentangling workplace innovation: a systematic literature review
    Prus, Iryna
    Nacamulli, Raoul C. D.
    Lazazzara, Alessandra
    PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2017, 46 (07) : 1254 - 1279