An automated treatment planning strategy for highly noncoplanar radiotherapy arc trajectories

被引:4
|
作者
Carrasqueira, P. [1 ]
Rocha, H. [1 ,2 ]
Dias, J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Ventura, T. [1 ,3 ]
Ferreira, B. C. [1 ,4 ]
Lopes, M. C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, INESCC, Rua Silvio Lima, P-3030290 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, FEUC, Ave Dias da Silva 165, P-3004512 Coimbra, Portugal
[3] EPE, IPOC FG, Ave Bissaya Barreto 98, P-3000075 Coimbra, Portugal
[4] ESS PP, Rua Valente Perfeito 322, P-4400330 Vila Nova De Gaia, Portugal
关键词
radiation therapy; noncoplanar arc therapy; optimization; automation; BEAM ANGLE OPTIMIZATION; VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC; ORIENTATION OPTIMIZATION; THERAPY; IMRT; FRAMEWORK; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1111/itor.12953
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Radiation therapy is a technology-driven cancer treatment modality that has experienced significant advances over the last decades, due to multidisciplinary contributions that include engineering and computing. Recent technological developments allow the use of noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), one of the most recent photon treatment techniques, in clinical practice. In this work, an automated noncoplanar arc trajectory optimization framework designed in two modular phases is presented. First, a noncoplanar beam angle optimization algorithm is used to obtain a set of noncoplanar irradiation directions. Then, anchored in these directions, an optimization strategy is proposed to compute an optimal arc trajectory. The computational experiments considered a pool of twelve difficult head-and-neck tumor cases. It was possible to observe that, for some of these cases, the optimized noncoplanar arc trajectories led to significant treatment planning quality improvements, when compared with coplanar VMAT treatment plans. Although these experiments were done in a research environment treatment planning software (matRad), the conclusions can be of interest for a clinical setting: automated procedures can simplify the current treatment workflow, produce high-quality treatment plans, making better use of human resources and allowing for unbiased comparisons between different treatment techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 223
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The development of target-eye-view maps for selection of coplanar or noncoplanar beams in conformal radiotherapy treatment planning
    Cho, BCJ
    Roa, WH
    Robinson, D
    Murray, B
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (11) : 2367 - 2372
  • [32] COMPENSATION IN 3-DIMENSIONAL NONCOPLANAR TREATMENT PLANNING
    KUTCHER, GJ
    BURMAN, C
    MOHAN, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 20 (01): : 127 - 134
  • [33] Automated treatment planning of volumetric arc therapy for patient with prostate cancer
    Olminska, M.
    Skrobala, A.
    Pawalowski, B.
    Piotrowski, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S1020 - S1020
  • [34] Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Optimization: A Comparison Between Robust Optimization and Adaptive Planning
    Ponte, Hugo
    Rocha, Humberto
    Dias, Joana
    OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, IO 2022-OR, 2023, 437 : 49 - 62
  • [35] Development and Clinical Introduction of Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning for Prostate Cancer
    Winkel, D.
    Bol, G. H.
    van Asselen, B.
    Hes, J.
    Scholten, V.
    Kerkmeijer, L. G. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3652 - 3653
  • [36] Automated 4π radiotherapy treatment planning with evolving knowledge-base
    Landers, Angelia
    O'Connor, Daniel
    Ruan, Dan
    Sheng, Ke
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (09) : 3833 - 3843
  • [37] Optimizing Practical Implementation of Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Tool: A Survey
    McGinnis, Gwendolyn
    Ning, Matthew
    Makufa, Remigio
    Cardenas, Carlos
    Grover, Surbhi
    Court, Laurence E.
    Smith, Grace
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 44 (10): : S125 - S126
  • [38] Clinical implementation of automated treatment planning for whole-brain radiotherapy
    Han, Eun Young
    Cardenas, Carlos E.
    Nguyen, Callistus
    Hancock, Donald
    Xiao, Yao
    Mumme, Raymond
    Court, Laurence E.
    Rhee, Dong Joo
    Netherton, Tucker J.
    Li, Jing
    Yeboa, Debra Nana
    Wang, Chenyang
    Briere, Tina M.
    Balter, Peter
    Martel, Mary K.
    Wen, Zhifei
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (09): : 94 - 102
  • [39] FMEA of manual and automated methods for commissioning a radiotherapy treatment planning system
    Wexler, Amy
    Gu, Bruce
    Goddu, Sreekrishna
    Mutic, Maya
    Yaddanapudi, Sridhar
    Olsen, Lindsey
    Harry, Taylor
    Noel, Camille
    Pawlicki, Todd
    Mutic, Sasa
    Cai, Bin
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (09) : 4415 - 4425
  • [40] Fully automated treatment planning for MLC-based robotic radiotherapy
    Schipaanboord, Bastiaan W. K.
    Gizynska, Marta K.
    Rossi, Linda
    Vries, Kim C.
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (08) : 4139 - 4147