Increasing the efficiency of li-ion battery cycle life testing with a partial-machine learning based end of life prediction

被引:3
|
作者
Kroeger, Thomas [1 ]
Boes, Alexander [1 ]
Maisel, Sven [2 ]
Luciani, Sara [3 ]
Schreiber, Markus [1 ]
Lienkamp, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich TUM, Inst Automot Technol, Sch Engn & Design, Dept Mobil Syst Engn, D-85748 Garching, Bavaria, Germany
[2] TUV Sud Battery Testing GmbH, Daimlerstr 15, D-85748 Garching, Bavaria, Germany
[3] Politecn Torino, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn DIMEAS, Inst Automot Technol, I-10129 Turin, Piermont, Italy
关键词
Li-ion battery; Cycle life testing; End-of-life; Machine learning; Kennard-Stone; Experimental design; HEALTH ESTIMATION; ONLINE STATE; DESIGN; MODEL; VALIDATION; SELECTION; CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2023.108842
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Extensive cycle life studies are conducted in the laboratory to understand the aging behavior of a li-ion battery under various environmental and operational conditions. However, designing an optimal test plan is not straightforward and usually leads to test plans with test points providing little information gain. This paper proposes a machine learning-enhanced testing procedure, which stops the expensive cycling of a subset of tested batteries and replaces their physical test result with a machine learning-based prediction. The core component of the proposed testing procedure is a test subset selection algorithm, which selects a subset of batteries during the cycling whose aging can be predicted with low errors. This is done by extracting aging features during the initial cycling period and feeding them into the Kennard-Stone algorithm to select batteries that have a similar distribution of their aging features as batteries that are physically cycled. Based on three different aging studies and four different machine learning-based predictors, it is shown that the proposed selection approach helps to reliably find subsets that can be predicted with significantly lower prediction errors than random selections. A feature set with capacity-, internal resistance-, and incremental capacity-based features is proposed, which helps to select battery subsets with low prediction errors across all three tested aging studies. Furthermore, it is shown that a higher dissimilarity between a battery and the batteries within the training set also results in a higher prediction error for the respective battery. Therefore, a dissimilarity -based threshold is defined to effectively select the most batteries for the prediction. For the three investigated aging studies, the proposed ML-enhanced testing approach allows to stop the cycling of 30% to 75% of all batteries while ensuring EOL predictions with < 10% MAPE.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] HyPELS: enhancing li-ion battery remaining useful life prediction with hybrid perspective ensemble learning strategy
    Han, Xuewei
    Yuan, Huimei
    Wu, Lifeng
    ENGINEERING RESEARCH EXPRESS, 2024, 6 (04):
  • [22] Cycle life test optimization for different Li-ion power battery formulations using a hybrid remaining-useful-life prediction method
    Ma, Jian
    Xu, Shu
    Shang, Pengchao
    Ding, Yu
    Qin, Weili
    Cheng, Yujie
    Lu, Chen
    Su, Yuzhuan
    Chong, Jin
    Jin, Haizu
    Lin, Yongshou
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 262
  • [23] Discussion on the Li-ion Battery Health Monitoring and Remaining-useful-life Prediction
    Zhang, Jin
    Gao, Antong
    Chen, Ronggang
    Han, Yusheng
    APPLIED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 724-725 : 797 - 803
  • [24] A Hybrid Machine Learning Model for Battery Cycle Life Prediction with Early Cycle Data
    Shen, Sheng
    Nemani, Venkat
    Liu, Jinqiang
    Hu, Chao
    Wang, Zhaoyu
    2020 IEEE TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE & EXPO (ITEC), 2020, : 181 - 184
  • [25] Life Cycle Inventories for Li-Ion Nanobattery Fabrication
    Hakimian, Ali
    Tokarz, Ashley
    Isaacs, Jacqueline A.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY (ISSST), 2012,
  • [26] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications
    Delgado, Mario Amin Salgado
    Usai, Lorenzo
    Pan, Qiaoyan
    Stromman, Anders Hammer
    MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (19)
  • [27] Li-Ion Battery State of Charge Prediction for Electric Vehicles Based on Improved Regularized Extreme Learning Machine
    Zhang, Baozhong
    Ren, Guoqiang
    WORLD ELECTRIC VEHICLE JOURNAL, 2023, 14 (08):
  • [28] GEO life testing of SAFT Li-ion batteries
    Dudley, G
    Planchat, JP
    Semerie, JP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH EUROPEAN SPACE POWER CONFERENCE (ESPC), 2002, 502 : 673 - 678
  • [29] A capacity and power fade study of Li-ion cells during life cycle testing
    Belt, JR
    Ho, CD
    Motloch, CG
    Miller, TJ
    Duong, TQ
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2003, 123 (02) : 241 - 246
  • [30] Event-Driven Acquisition and Machine-Learning-Based Efficient Prediction of the Li-Ion Battery Capacity
    Saeed Mian Qaisar
    Amal Essam ElDin AbdelGawad
    Kathiravan Srinivasan
    SN Computer Science, 2022, 3 (1)