Educational tools support informed decision-making for genetic carrier screening in a heterogenic Israeli population

被引:0
|
作者
Gafni-Amsalem, Chen [1 ,2 ]
Aboleil-Zoubi, Olfat [1 ,2 ]
Chervinsky, Elena [2 ]
Aleme, Ola [2 ]
Khayat, Morad [2 ]
Bashir, Husam [2 ]
Perets, Lilach Peled [2 ]
Mamluk, Efrat [2 ]
Hakrosh, Shadia [2 ]
Kurtzman, Shoshi [2 ]
Tamir, Liron [2 ]
Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet [3 ]
Shalev, Stavit A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Technion, Rappaport Fac Med, Hadera, Israel
[2] Emek Med Ctr, Genet Inst, IL-18101 Afula, Israel
[3] Technion, Fac Educ Sci & Technol, Hefa, Israel
关键词
Reproductive genetic carrier screening; Informed choice; Patient education; COGNITIVE LOCK-IN; CHOICE; VALIDATION; LITERACY; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1007/s12687-023-00694-4
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) aims to provide couples with information to make informed decisions. Since 2013, the Israeli Carrier Screening Program has been offered routinely and free of charge to all Israelis of reproductive age, personalized based on religion, ethnicity, and village/tribe where a disorder is frequent. This study evaluated the impact of two educational tools on an informed choice on RGCS uptake and satisfaction with counselling within a heterogeneous population in northern Israel. Participants from diverse sociodemographic population groups were randomly assigned to watch an animated film, read a booklet conveying the same information, or receive no information before counselling for RGCS, and asked to complete pre- and post-counselling questionnaires. A higher informed-decision rate was demonstrated in the film (n=93/141, 66%) and booklet (n=88/131, 67%) groups vs. the non-intervention group (n=62/143, 43%) (P<0.001), assessed by the Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that allocation to an intervention group, Jewish ethnicity and higher education level, best predicted informed choice. Most participants expressed high levels of satisfaction with the counselling process, regardless of group assignment. While only a minority of participants reported seeking information prior to visiting the clinic, the pre-counselling information interventions were well accepted. Pre-counselling self-learning educational tools should be promoted, easily available, and adjusted linguistically and culturally to targeted populations, to avoid unwanted "automatic" compliance of tested individuals and maximize the potential of informed decision-making. Our study can be applied to other countries where majority and minority ethnic groups access genetic services.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 146
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Interactive, Online, Informed Decision-Making Tool for Genetic Counseling & Genetic Testing in ALS
    Doyle, Anne Marie
    Webb, Lauren
    Dratch, Laynie
    Roggenbuck, Jennifer
    Kinsley, Lisa
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 2023, 68 : S33 - S33
  • [42] Are couples making informed choices when opting for reproductive genetic carrier screening?
    Van Steijvoort, Eva
    Peeters, Hilde
    Vandecruys, Hilde
    Verguts, Jasper
    Peeraer, Karen
    Matthijs, Gert
    Borry, Pascal
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2023, 31 : 686 - 686
  • [43] Women's misconceptions about cancer screening: implications for informed decision-making
    Denberg, TD
    Wong, S
    Beattie, A
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2005, 57 (03) : 280 - 285
  • [44] Risk communication, prenatal screening, and prenatal diagnosis: the illusion of informed decision-making
    Siegrist, Michael
    Cousin, Marie-Eve
    Keller, Carmen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2008, 11 (1-2) : 87 - 97
  • [45] Principles for screening: Too few concerns for informed consent and shared decision-making?
    Braillon, Alain
    Nicot, Philippe
    Bour, Cecile
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2018, 190 (37) : E1115 - E1115
  • [46] Tools to evaluate decision-making in the context of cancer screening - a systematic review
    Krueger, K.
    Walter, U.
    Dreier, M.
    [J]. GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2015, 77
  • [47] Informed decision-making in newborn screening: Highly variable regulatory language.
    Lewis, MH
    McCabe, L
    McCabe, ERB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2002, 71 (04) : 378 - 378
  • [48] Radiation risks and uncertainties: a scoping review to support communication and informed decision-making
    Hoti, Ferdiana
    Perko, Tanja
    Thijssen, Peter
    Renn, Ortwin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2020, 40 (02) : 612 - 631
  • [49] Randomised cluster trial to support informed parental decision-making for the MMR vaccine
    Jackson, Cath
    Cheater, Francine M.
    Harrison, Wendy
    Peacock, Rose
    Bekker, Hilary
    West, Robert
    Leese, Brenda
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
  • [50] The use of GIS tools to support decision-making in the expansion of chain stores
    Suarez-Vega, Rafael
    Santos-Penate, Dolores R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2014, 28 (03) : 553 - 569