Statistical inference on quantiles of two independent populations under uncertainty

被引:0
|
作者
Hesamian, Gholamreza [1 ]
Chukhrova, Nataliya [2 ]
Johannssen, Arne [3 ]
机构
[1] Payame Noor Univ, Dept Stat, Tehran 193953697, Iran
[2] HafenCity Univ Hamburg, D-20457 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hamburg, Fac Business Adm, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Fuzzy random variable; Fuzzy quantile function; Fuzzy hypothesis; Fuzzy test; Non-parametric test; TESTING FUZZY HYPOTHESES; BOOTSTRAP TECHNIQUES;
D O I
10.1007/s00500-023-09202-9
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Statistical inference is the process of drawing conclusions about underlying population(s) using sample data to either confirm or falsify hypotheses. However, the complexity of real-life problems often makes the underlying statistical models inadequate, as information is often imprecise in many respects. To address this common problem, some papers have been published on modifications and extensions of test concepts by employing tools of fuzzy statistics. In this paper, we present a non-parametric test for the difference between quantiles of two independent populations based on fuzzy random variables. For this purpose, we consider the fuzzy quantile function and its estimation based on alpha-values of fuzzy random variables. We then provide a fuzzy test based on the fuzzy empirical distribution function for the difference of fuzzy order statistics from these independent populations. We also suggest a specific degree-based criterion to compare the fuzzy test statistics at a specific significance level to decide whether the underlying fuzzy null hypothesis can be rejected or not. The effectiveness of the proposed two-sample test on quantiles is investigated via numerical examples.
引用
收藏
页码:17573 / 17583
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Statistical inference on kurtosis of independent component model
    Zhou, Bowen
    Chen, Hantao
    Wang, Cheng
    [J]. RANDOM MATRICES-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2024,
  • [32] Smoothed empirical likelihood inference for the difference of two quantiles with right censoring
    Yang, Hanfang
    Yau, Crystal
    Zhao, Yichuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2014, 146 : 95 - 101
  • [33] Delusions, Illusions and Inference under Uncertainty
    Hohwy, Jakob
    [J]. MIND & LANGUAGE, 2013, 28 (01) : 57 - 71
  • [34] Sociolinguistic Perception as Inference Under Uncertainty
    Kleinschmidt, Dave F.
    Weatherholtz, Kodi
    Jaeger, T. Florian
    [J]. TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2018, 10 (04) : 818 - 834
  • [35] Comparing two independent groups via the lower and upper quantiles
    Wilcox, Rand R.
    Erceg-Hurn, David M.
    Clark, Florence
    Carlson, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2014, 84 (07) : 1543 - 1551
  • [36] A SURVEY OF TECHNIQUES FOR INFERENCE UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    SHERIDAN, FKJ
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 1991, 5 (1-2) : 89 - 119
  • [37] Constrained optimization in newsboy. problems under uncertainty via statistical inference equivalence principle
    Nechval, NA
    Nechval, KN
    [J]. ASMTA 2005: 12th International Conference on Analytical and Stochastic Modelling Techniques and Applications, Proceedings, 2005, : 166 - 171
  • [38] Inference for two Lomax populations under joint type-II censoring
    Asar, Yasin
    Belaghi, R. Arabi
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2022, 51 (11) : 6808 - 6825
  • [39] How Should We Quantify Uncertainty in Statistical Inference?
    Lele, Subhash R.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 8
  • [40] MODEL UNCERTAINTY, DATA MINING AND STATISTICAL-INFERENCE
    CHATFIELD, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1995, 158 : 419 - 466