Transfer of Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients With COVID-19 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Interhospital transport of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients bears transport-associated risks. It is unknown how interhospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) transfer of COVID-19 patients by mobile ECMO units affects ARDS mortality. We compared the outcome of 94 COVID-19 patients cannulated in primary care hospitals and retrieved by mobile ECMO-teams to that of 84 patients cannulated at five German ECMO centers. Patients were recruited from March 2020 to November 2021. Twenty-six transports were airborne, 68 were land-based. Age, sex, body-mass-index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, days invasively ventilated, and P/F-Ratio before ECMO initiation were similar in both groups. Counting only regional transports (& LE;250 km), mean transport distance was 139.5 km & PLUSMN; 17.7 km for helicopter (duration 52.5 & PLUSMN; 10.6 minutes) and 69.8 km & PLUSMN; 44.1 km for ambulance or mobile intensive care unit (duration 57.6 & PLUSMN; 29.4 minutes). Overall time of vvECMO support (20.4 & PLUSMN; 15.2 ECMO days for transported patients vs. 21.0 & PLUSMN; 20.5 for control, p = 0.83) and days invasively ventilated (27.9 & PLUSMN; 18.1 days vs. 32.6 & PLUSMN; 25.1 days, p = 0.16) were similar. Overall mortality did not differ between transported patients and controls (57/94 [61%] vs. 51/83 [61%], p = 0.43). COVID-19 patients cannulated and retrieved by mobile ECMO-teams have no excess risk compared with patients receiving vvECMO at experienced ECMO centers. Patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS, limited comorbidities, and no contraindication for ECMO should be referred early to local ECMO centers.