Factors affecting cultural ecosystem services use in Vilnius (Lithuania): A participatory mapping survey approach

被引:7
|
作者
Pinto, Luis Valenca [1 ,2 ]
Inacio, Miguel
Bogdzevic, Katazyna [3 ]
Kalinauskas, Marius [2 ]
Gomes, Eduardo [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Pereira, Paulo [2 ]
机构
[1] Coimbra Agrarian Tech Sch, Polytech Inst Coimbra, Res Ctr Nat Resources Environm & Soc CERNAS, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Mykolas Romeris Univ, Environm Management Lab, Ate St 20, Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Mykolas Romeris Univ, Inst Int & European Union Law, Ate St 20, Vilnius, Lithuania
[4] Univ Lisbon, Inst Geog & Spatial Planning, Ctr Geog Studies, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Associated Lab TERRA, Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Cultural ecosystem services; Urban green spaces; Recreation experience preferences; Local-level analysis; Participatory mapping; URBAN GREEN SPACES; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PERCEPTIONS; PARK; RESIDENTS; HEALTH; INFRASTRUCTURE; PREFERENCES; BENEFITS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15384
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Assessing preferences of recreational activities related to cultural ecosystem services (CES) in urban areas is essential for decision-making and urban green space (UGS) management. This work aims to assess the preferences and factors (based on socio-demographic and motivation variables) influencing CES-related activities in Vilnius, Lithuania, to provide scientific knowledge to support more efficient UGS design and management. Participatory mapping was reported as relevant for urban park planning and decision-making and was applied to identify spatially explicit CES. We assessed the perceived relevance of five CES-related activities groups (Social activities, Inspirational activities, Cultural activities, Spiritual activities, and Physical activities) via participatory mapping through an online survey (n = 1.114). The users selected one preferred geographic location for each CES-related activities group and attributed relevance (using a 5-point Likert scale) for a set of motivation items. The results showed that Physical and Social activities were the respondents' most important CES-related activity groups, while Spiritual activities were the less popular. Factor Analysis showed that the respondent's recreation experience preferences, or motivations, were the most relevant variables influencing all the groups except for the Social activities group. Regarding Cultural activities, preferences for understanding things & learn about history were the most relevant variables. For Inspirational activities, the variables developing knowledge & to learn were the most important. Enjoying nature's quietness & frequency was the most relevant for Physical activities. Regarding Spiritual activities, the most important variables were related to the develop-ment of spiritual activities and the reflection on personal religious values. Finally, socio-demographic variables mainly influenced social activities, namely education level, gender and age group. The spatial distribution was different between activity groups. Inspirational activities showed the highest dispersion, and Spiritual activities the highest concentration. The results of this work are relevant to municipal managers, as they allow for a better understanding of users' interactions with the territory, its multifunctionality, and potential areas of conflict between conservation and recreation.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] FACTORS AFFECTING THE USE OF PROSTHETIC SERVICES
    NIELSEN, CC
    PSONAK, RA
    KALTER, TL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS, 1989, 1 (04) : 242 - 249
  • [42] The Assessment of Factors Affecting Fertiliser Use on Family Farms in Lithuania
    Besuspariene, Erika
    Niskanen, Vesa A.
    [J]. STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 122 (01): : 13 - 21
  • [43] Assessing the diversity and evenness of ecosystem services as perceived by residents using participatory mapping
    Karimi, Azadeh
    Raymond, Christopher M.
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 138
  • [44] Assessing the diversity and evenness of ecosystem services as perceived by residents using participatory mapping
    Karimi, Azadeh
    Raymond, Christopher M.
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 138
  • [45] Spatial differences of the supply of multiple ecosystem services and the environmental and land use factors affecting them
    Pan, Ying
    Xu, Zengrang
    Wu, Junxi
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 : E4 - E10
  • [46] An Approach to Mapping the Potential of Cultural Agroecosystem Services
    Makovnikova, Jarmila
    Kobza, Jozef
    Palka, Boris
    Malis, Jozef
    Kanianska, Radoslava
    Kizekova, Miriam
    [J]. SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 11 (01) : 44 - 52
  • [47] Mapping cultural ecosystem services in the hyper arid environment of south of Jordan
    Albalawneh, Abeer
    Al-Assaf, Amani
    Sweity, Amer
    Abu Hammour, Wafa'a
    Kloub, Khawla
    Hjazin, Amgad
    Kabariti, Rabab
    Abu Nowar, Lana
    Tadros, Maher J.
    Aljaafreh, Safaa
    Diab, Mai
    Alwidyan, Jafar
    Albashbsheh, Ghadeer
    Haddad, Nizar
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [48] Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A case study in Lesvos Island, Greece
    Banela, Marina
    Kitsiou, Dimitra
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 246
  • [49] Participatory mapping of ecosystem services across a gradient of agricultural intensification in West Kalimantan, Indonesia
    Mathys, A. S.
    van Vianen, J.
    Rowland, D.
    Narulita, S.
    Palomo, I.
    Pascual, U.
    Sutherland, I. J.
    Ahammad, R.
    Sunderland, T.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [50] Participatory mapping of ecosystem services to understand stakeholders' perceptions of the future of the Mactaquac Dam, Canada
    Reilly, Kate
    Adamowski, Jan
    John, Kimberly
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 30 : 107 - 123