Factors affecting cultural ecosystem services use in Vilnius (Lithuania): A participatory mapping survey approach

被引:7
|
作者
Pinto, Luis Valenca [1 ,2 ]
Inacio, Miguel
Bogdzevic, Katazyna [3 ]
Kalinauskas, Marius [2 ]
Gomes, Eduardo [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Pereira, Paulo [2 ]
机构
[1] Coimbra Agrarian Tech Sch, Polytech Inst Coimbra, Res Ctr Nat Resources Environm & Soc CERNAS, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Mykolas Romeris Univ, Environm Management Lab, Ate St 20, Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Mykolas Romeris Univ, Inst Int & European Union Law, Ate St 20, Vilnius, Lithuania
[4] Univ Lisbon, Inst Geog & Spatial Planning, Ctr Geog Studies, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Associated Lab TERRA, Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Cultural ecosystem services; Urban green spaces; Recreation experience preferences; Local-level analysis; Participatory mapping; URBAN GREEN SPACES; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PERCEPTIONS; PARK; RESIDENTS; HEALTH; INFRASTRUCTURE; PREFERENCES; BENEFITS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15384
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Assessing preferences of recreational activities related to cultural ecosystem services (CES) in urban areas is essential for decision-making and urban green space (UGS) management. This work aims to assess the preferences and factors (based on socio-demographic and motivation variables) influencing CES-related activities in Vilnius, Lithuania, to provide scientific knowledge to support more efficient UGS design and management. Participatory mapping was reported as relevant for urban park planning and decision-making and was applied to identify spatially explicit CES. We assessed the perceived relevance of five CES-related activities groups (Social activities, Inspirational activities, Cultural activities, Spiritual activities, and Physical activities) via participatory mapping through an online survey (n = 1.114). The users selected one preferred geographic location for each CES-related activities group and attributed relevance (using a 5-point Likert scale) for a set of motivation items. The results showed that Physical and Social activities were the respondents' most important CES-related activity groups, while Spiritual activities were the less popular. Factor Analysis showed that the respondent's recreation experience preferences, or motivations, were the most relevant variables influencing all the groups except for the Social activities group. Regarding Cultural activities, preferences for understanding things & learn about history were the most relevant variables. For Inspirational activities, the variables developing knowledge & to learn were the most important. Enjoying nature's quietness & frequency was the most relevant for Physical activities. Regarding Spiritual activities, the most important variables were related to the develop-ment of spiritual activities and the reflection on personal religious values. Finally, socio-demographic variables mainly influenced social activities, namely education level, gender and age group. The spatial distribution was different between activity groups. Inspirational activities showed the highest dispersion, and Spiritual activities the highest concentration. The results of this work are relevant to municipal managers, as they allow for a better understanding of users' interactions with the territory, its multifunctionality, and potential areas of conflict between conservation and recreation.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping and assessment of recreational cultural ecosystem services supply and demand in Vilnius (Lithuania)
    Kalinauskas, Marius
    Bogdzevic, Katazyna
    Gomes, Eduardo
    Inacio, Miguel
    Barcelo, Damia
    Zhao, Wenwu
    Pereira, Paulo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 855
  • [2] Factors affecting the use of cultural ecosystem services in Lithuanian coastal area
    Pinto, Luis Valenta
    Inacio, Miguel
    Bogdzevic, Katazyna
    Gomes, Eduardo
    Pereira, Paulo
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 251
  • [3] Pull and push factors for use of urban green spaces and priorities for their ecosystem services: Case study of Vilnius, Lithuania
    Misiune, Ieva
    Julian, Jason P.
    Veteikis, Darijus
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2021, 58
  • [4] National assessment of cultural ecosystem services: Participatory mapping in Switzerland
    Jaligot, Remi
    Hasler, Stephanie
    Chenal, Jerome
    [J]. AMBIO, 2019, 48 (10) : 1219 - 1233
  • [5] National assessment of cultural ecosystem services: Participatory mapping in Switzerland
    Rémi Jaligot
    Stéphanie Hasler
    Jérôme Chenal
    [J]. Ambio, 2019, 48 : 1219 - 1233
  • [6] FACTORS OF SERVICE QUALITY AFFECTING STUDENTS, AS CUSTOMERS, SATISFACTION OF RIDESHARING SERVICES IN VILNIUS, LITHUANIA
    Ginaviciene, Jurgita
    Sprogyte, Indre
    [J]. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION, VOL VI: PUBLIC HEALTH AND SPORT, RESEARCHES IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE EDUCATION, 2020, : 615 - 624
  • [7] Mapping and assessment of ecosystem health in the Vilnius functional zone (Lithuania)
    Das, Manob
    Inacio, Miguel
    Das, Arijit
    Barcelo, Damia
    Pereira, Paulo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 912
  • [8] A New Approach to Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services
    Mouttaki, Ikram
    Khomalli, Youssef
    Maanan, Mohamed
    Bagdanaviciute, Ingrida
    Rhinane, Hassan
    Kuriqi, Alban
    Pham, Quoc Bao
    Maanan, Mehdi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, 8 (06)
  • [9] Mapping ecosystem services potential in Lithuania
    Depellegrin, Daniel
    Pereira, Paulo
    Misiune, Ieva
    Egarter-Vigl, Lukas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (05): : 441 - 455
  • [10] Participatory Mapping of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Madrid: Insights for Landscape Planning
    Garcia-Diez, Victor
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    Gonzalez, Jose A.
    [J]. LAND, 2020, 9 (08)