Patient-Reported Barriers and Enablers to Deprescribing Recommendations During a Clinical Trial (Shed-MEDS)

被引:7
|
作者
Kim, Jennifer L. [1 ,2 ]
Lewallen, Kanah M. [1 ,2 ]
Hollingsworth, Emily K. [1 ]
Shah, Avantika S. [1 ]
Simmons, Sandra F. [1 ,3 ]
Vasilevskis, Eduard E. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Ctr Qual Aging, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Nursing, 461 21st Ave South, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[3] VA Tennessee Healthcare Syst, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr GRECC, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Sect Hosp Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Publ Hlth, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
来源
GERONTOLOGIST | 2023年 / 63卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Patient-centered; Polypharmacy; Shared decision making; STOPP SCREENING TOOL; OLDER-ADULTS; GERIATRIC SYNDROMES; MEDICATION; PRESCRIPTIONS; QUESTIONNAIRE; POLYPHARMACY; ASSOCIATION; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1093/geront/gnac100
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Effective deprescribing requires shared decision making between a patient and their clinician, and should be used when implementing evidence-based deprescribing conversations. As part of the Shed-MEDS clinical trial, this study assessed barriers and enablers that influence patient decision making in deprescribing to inform future implementation efforts and adaptations. Research Design and Methods: Shed-MEDS, a randomized controlled deprescribing trial, included hospitalized older adults discharging to post-acute care facilities. A trained clinician reviewed each participant's medical history and medication list to identify medications with potential for deprescribing. The study clinician then conducted a semistructured patient-centered deprescribing interview to determine patient (or surrogate) concerns about medications and willingness to deprescribe. Reeve et al.'s (2013) framework was used to categorize barriers and enablers to deprescribing from the patient's perspective, including "appropriateness of cessation," "fear," "dislike of a medication," "influences," and "process of cessation." Results: Overall, participants/surrogates (N = 177) agreed with 63% (883 total medications) of the study clinician's deprescribing recommendations. Thematic analysis revealed that "appropriateness" of a medication was the most common barrier (88.2%) and enabler (67.3%) to deprescribing. Other deprescribing enablers were in the following domains: "influences" (22.7%), "process" (22.5%), "pragmatic" (19.4%), and "dislike" (5.3%). Discussion and Implications: Use of a semistructured deprescribing interview conversation tool allowed study clinicians to elicit individual barriers and enablers to deprescribing from the patient's perspective. Participants in this study expressed more agreement than disagreement with study clinicians' deprescribing recommendations. These results should inform future implementation efforts that incorporate a patient-centered framework during deprescribing conversations.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 533
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low Concordance of Patient-Reported Outcomes With Clinical and Clinical Trial Documentation
    Fares, Charlene M.
    Williamson, Timothy J.
    Theisen, Matthew K.
    Cummings, Amy
    Bornazyan, Krikor
    Carroll, James
    Spiegel, Marshall L.
    Stanton, Annette L.
    Garon, Edward B.
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2018, 2 : 1 - 12
  • [22] Exploring patient-reported barriers to participating in proton therapy clinical trials
    Kristensen, Anne Wilhoft
    Jensen, Annesofie Lunde
    Jensen, Kenneth
    Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerre
    Friborg, Jeppe
    Grau, Cai
    TECHNICAL INNOVATIONS & PATIENT SUPPORT IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 29
  • [23] Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in a phase I clinical trial
    Qin, Rui
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Satele, Daniel
    Molina, Julian
    Erlichman, Charles
    Basch, Ethan
    Sloan, Jeff
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22
  • [24] Clinical trial of biopsies in oncology: Patient-reported impact (BIOPSY).
    Wilson, Michelle K.
    Lheureux, Stephanie
    Cyriac, Sunu
    Dhani, Neesha C.
    Butler, Marcus
    Gutierrez, David
    Mandilaras, Victoria
    Ethier, Josee-Lyne
    Colombo, Ilaria
    Lee, Yeh Chen
    Kanjanapan, Yada
    Bonilla, Luisa
    Hunt, Wendy
    Bowering, Valerie
    Oza, Amit M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [25] Patient-Reported Outcomes as a Recruitment Strategy for Clinical Trial Enrollment
    Verdini, Nicholas P.
    Bryl, Karolina L.
    Baser, Raymond E.
    Lapen, Kaitlyn
    Mao, Jun J.
    Gillespie, Erin F.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10 (06) : 784 - 788
  • [26] "Real-time" collection and use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in outpatient oncology: barriers, enablers, and impact on consultation length
    Cook, Olivia
    Kwok, Alastair
    Webber, Kate
    White, Michelle
    Segelov, Eva
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 145 - 146
  • [27] Developing patient-reported outcome measures for pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    Burke, Laurie B.
    Gershon, Richard
    Rothman, Margaret
    Scott, Jane
    Allen, Robert R.
    Atkinson, J. Hampton
    Chandler, Julie
    Cleeland, Charles
    Cowan, Penny
    Dimitrova, Rozalina
    Dionne, Raymond
    Farrar, John T.
    Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A.
    Hertz, Sharon
    Jadad, Alejandro R.
    Jensen, Mark P.
    Kellstein, David
    Kerns, Robert D.
    Manning, Donald C.
    Martin, Susan
    Max, Mitchell B.
    McDermott, Michael P.
    McGrath, Patrick
    Moulin, Dwight E.
    Nurmikko, Turo
    Quessy, Steve
    Raja, Srinivasa
    Rappaport, Bob A.
    Rauschkolb, Christine
    Robinson, James P.
    Royal, Mike A.
    Simon, Lee
    Stauffer, Joseph W.
    Stucki, Gerold
    Tollett, Jane
    von Stein, Thorsten
    Wallace, Mark S.
    Wernicke, Joachim
    White, Richard E.
    Williams, Amanda C.
    Witter, James
    Wyrwich, Kathleen W.
    PAIN, 2006, 125 (03) : 208 - 215
  • [28] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges
    Agarwal, Anupriya
    Pain, Tilley
    Levesque, Jean-Frederic
    Girgis, Afaf
    Hoffman, Anna
    Karnon, Jonathan
    King, Madeleine T.
    Shah, Karan K.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 216 (01) : 9 - 11
  • [29] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges
    Trujols, Joan
    Duran-Sindreu, Santiago
    Portella, Maria J.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 217 (02) : 110 - 110
  • [30] APPLYING THE GLOBAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE TO THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL
    Wiedmeyer, Carole
    Fraenkel, Liana
    Wei, Zhenglin
    Ramsey, Christine
    Michaud, Kaleb D.
    Neogi, Tuhina
    Nowell, William
    Venkatachalam, Shilpa
    Broniatowski, David
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (01) : E26 - E27