Efficacy of Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Goodoory, Vivek C. [1 ,2 ]
Khasawneh, Mais [1 ,2 ]
Black, Christopher J. [1 ,2 ]
Quigley, Eamonn M. M. [3 ]
Moayyedi, Paul [4 ]
Ford, Alexander C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St James Univ Hosp, Leeds Gastroenterol Inst, Room 125,4th Floor,Bexley Wing,Beckett St, Leeds LS9 7TF, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Biomed & Clin Sci, Leeds, England
[3] Houston Methodist Hosp, Lynda K & David M Underwood Ctr Digest Disorders, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Houston, TX USA
[4] McMaster Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Gastroenterol Div, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Meta-analysis; Probiotics; Abdominal Pain; Abdominal Bloating; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT; FECAL MICROBIOTA; PREBIOTICS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1053/j.gastro.2023.07.018
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Some probiotics may be beneficial in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but differences in species and strains used, as well as endpoints reported, have hampered attempts to make specific recommendations as to which should be preferred. We updated our previous meta-analysis exam-ining this issue. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched (up to March 2023). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting adults with IBS, comparing probiotics with placebo were eligible. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled to obtain a relative risk of global symptoms, abdominal pain, or abdominal bloating or distension persisting after therapy, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous data were pooled using a standardized mean difference with a 95% CI. Adverse events data were also pooled. RESULTS: We identified 82 eligible trials, containing 10,332 patients. Only 24 RCTs were at low risk of bias across all domains. For global symptoms, there was moderate certainty in the evidence for a benefit of Escherichia strains, low certainty for Lactobacillus strains and Lactobacillus plantarum 299V, and very low certainty for combination pro-biotics, LacClean Gold S, Duolac 7s, and Bacillus strains. For abdominal pain, there was low certainty in the evidence for a benefit of Saccharomyces cerevisae I-3856 and Bifidobacterium strains, and very low certainty for combination probiotics, Lactobacillus, Saccharomyces, and Bacillus strains. For abdom-inal bloating or distension there was very low certainty in the evidence for a benefit of combination probiotics and Bacillus strains. The relative risk of experiencing any adverse event, in 55 trials, including more than 7000 patients, was not signifi- cantly higher with probiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Some combina-tions of probiotics or strains may be beneficial in IBS. However, certainty in the evidence for efficacy by GRADE criteria was low to very low across almost all of our analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:1206 / 1218
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials
    Nikfar, Shekoufeh
    Rahimi, Roja
    Rahimi, Fatemeh
    Derakhshani, Saeed
    Abdollahi, Mohammad
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (12) : 1775 - 1780
  • [32] Efficacy of Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials
    Ford, Alexander C.
    Talley, Nicholas J.
    Quigley, Eamonn M. M.
    Moayyedi, Paul
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (10) : 1805 - 1805
  • [33] Efficacy of psychological therapies for irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Black, Christopher J.
    Thakur, Elyse R.
    Houghton, Lesley A.
    Quigley, Eamonn M. M.
    Moayyedi, Paul
    Ford, Alexander C.
    GUT, 2020, 69 (08) : 1441 - +
  • [34] Efficacy of psychological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yao, Fei
    Wu, Xutao
    Zhao, Huacheng
    Gan, Chun
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (10) : E29033
  • [35] Efficacy of antispasmodics and peppermint oil in irritable bowel syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ford, Alexander
    Talley, Nicholas
    Spiegel, Brennan
    Foxx-Orenstein, Amy
    Schiller, Lawrence
    Quigley, Eamonn
    Moayyedi, Paul
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 : S459 - S459
  • [36] Endometriosis and irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Francesca Chiaffarino
    Sonia Cipriani
    Elena Ricci
    Paola Agnese Mauri
    Giovanna Esposito
    Marta Barretta
    Paolo Vercellini
    Fabio Parazzini
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 303 : 17 - 25
  • [37] Meditation and Irritable Bowel Syndrome, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Babos, Cristian-Ioan
    Leucuta, Daniel-Corneliu
    Dumitrascu, Dan Lucian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (21)
  • [38] Efficacy of a Restrictive Diet in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Yu, Seung Jung
    Lee, Hong Sub
    Gung, Hyeon Jeong
    Kim, Ju Seok
    Kim, Ki Bae
    Kwon, Yong Hwan
    Kim, Jae Hak
    Koo, Hoon Sup
    Shin, Hyun-Deok
    Jee, Sam Ryong
    Lee, Han Byul
    Kim, Jeehyoung
    Park, Hye-Won
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 80 (01): : 6 - 16
  • [39] The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Hangkai Huang
    Linjie Lu
    Yishu Chen
    Yan Zeng
    Chengfu Xu
    Nutrition Journal, 21
  • [40] Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xu, Dabo
    Chen, Vincent L.
    Steiner, Calen A.
    Berinstein, Jeffrey A.
    Eswaran, Shanti
    Waljee, Akbar K.
    Higgins, Peter D. R.
    Owyang, Chung
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 (07): : 1043 - 1050