What difference do new factor models make in portfolio allocation?
被引:1
|
作者:
Fabozzi, Frank J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
EDHEC Business Sch, 393 Promenade des Anglais BP3116, F-06202 Nice 3, FranceEDHEC Business Sch, 393 Promenade des Anglais BP3116, F-06202 Nice 3, France
Fabozzi, Frank J.
[1
]
Huang, Dashan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Singapore Management Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Business, Singapore 178899, SingaporeEDHEC Business Sch, 393 Promenade des Anglais BP3116, F-06202 Nice 3, France
Huang, Dashan
[2
]
Jiang, Fuwei
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Beijing 100018, Peoples R ChinaEDHEC Business Sch, 393 Promenade des Anglais BP3116, F-06202 Nice 3, France
Jiang, Fuwei
[3
]
Wang, Jiexun
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
P&G Singapore Innovat Ctr, 70 Biopolis St, Singapore 138547, SingaporeEDHEC Business Sch, 393 Promenade des Anglais BP3116, F-06202 Nice 3, France
Wang, Jiexun
[4
]
机构:
[1] EDHEC Business Sch, 393 Promenade des Anglais BP3116, F-06202 Nice 3, France
[2] Singapore Management Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Business, Singapore 178899, Singapore
[3] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Beijing 100018, Peoples R China
This paper compares the Hou-Xue-Zhang four-factor model with the Fama-French five-factor model from an investing perspective both in-and out-of-sample. Without margin requirements and model uncertainty, the Hou-Xue-Zhang model outperforms the Fama-French model. However, the outperformance could become negligible if an investor is subject to margin requirements and model uncertainty. The Hou-Xue-Zhang model shows similar power as the Fama-French model in describing the covariance matrix of asset returns. Overall, the two models do not make a difference for investing in a realistic setting.