Nectar robbers and simulated robbing differ in their effects on nectar microbial communities

被引:1
|
作者
Luizzi, Victoria J. [1 ,5 ]
Harrington, Alison H. [1 ,2 ]
Bronstein, Judith L. [1 ]
Arnold, A. Elizabeth [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Herbarium, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Sch Plant Sci, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Inst Bio5, Tucson, AZ USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, 1041 E Lowell, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
flowers; nectar microbes; nectar robbing; plant-animal interaction; pollination biology; FLORAL NECTAR; IPOMOPSIS-AGGREGATA; POLLINATOR BEHAVIOR; FLOWERS; FITNESS; PATTERNS; REDUCE; ANTS; L;
D O I
10.1111/1442-1984.12446
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Floral nectar contains microbes that can influence nectar chemistry and pollinator visitation, and these microbial communities can be affected by pollinators in turn. Some flowers are also visited by nectar robbers, which feed on nectar through holes cut in floral tissue. If nectar robbers alter nectar microbial communities, they might have unexpected impacts on pollinator visitation. We investigated whether robbing could affect nectar microbial communities directly, by introducing microbes, or indirectly, by triggering a plant response to floral damage. We applied four treatments to flowers of Tecoma x "Orange Jubilee" (Bignoniaceae) in an arboretum setting: flowers were (1) covered to exclude all visitors; (2) available to both pollinators and nectar robbers and robbed naturally by carpenter bees; (3) available to pollinators only but cut at the base to simulate nectar robbing damage; or (4) available to pollinators only. We found that nectar in flowers accessible to any visitors was more likely to contain culturable microbes than flowers from which visitors were excluded. Microbial community composition and beta diversity were similar across treatments. Among flowers containing culturable microbes, flowers available to pollinators and nectar robbers had higher microbial abundance than flowers with simulated robbing, but there were no differences between flowers available to pollinators and robbers and unwounded flowers from which robbers were excluded. Overall, our results suggest that floral damage can affect some features of nectar microbial communities, but specific effects of nectar robbing are limited compared with the influence of visitation in general. This study experimentally tested whether nectar robbers and pollinators differ in their effects on nectar microbial communities of Tecoma x "Orange Jubilee" and whether any differences are due specifically to floral damage caused by robbing. Simulated robbing damage (but not natural robbing) decreased microbial abundance, relative to flowers from which robbers were excluded. Nectar microbial communities were otherwise similar in robbed and unrobbed flowers, and we found much greater differences between flowers that were unvisited versus flowers that received any kind of visit (robber or pollinator).image
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 137
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Effects of Nectar-Robbing on Fruit Production in Sparattosperma leucanthum (Bignoniaceae)
    Polatto, Leandro Pereira
    Chaud-Netto, Jose
    Alves Junior, Valter Vieira
    Stanzani Dutra, Joao Cloves
    SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (02): : 223 - 235
  • [22] Immediate Effects of Nectar Robbing by Palestine Sunbirds (Nectarinia osea) on Nectar Alkaloid Concentrations in Tree Tobacco (Nicotiana glauca)
    Kaczorowski, Rainee L.
    Koplovich, Avi
    Sporer, Frank
    Wink, Michael
    Markman, Shai
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 40 (04) : 325 - 330
  • [23] FLOWER DESTRUCTION AND NECTAR DEPLETION BY AVIAN NECTAR ROBBERS ON A TROPICAL TREE, CORDIA-SEBESTENA
    ASKINS, RA
    ERCOLINO, KM
    WALLER, JD
    JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 1987, 58 (03) : 345 - 349
  • [24] Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species
    Irwin, RE
    Maloof, JE
    OECOLOGIA, 2002, 133 (04) : 525 - 533
  • [25] Impacts of nectar robbing on the foraging ecology of a territorial hummingbird
    Hazlehurst, Jenny A.
    Karubian, Jordan O.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2018, 149 : 27 - 34
  • [26] Secondary nectar robbing by Lycaenidae and Riodinidae: Opportunistic but not infrequent
    Rankin, Erin E. Wilson E.
    Rankin, David T.
    ECOLOGY, 2023, 104 (02)
  • [27] Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species
    Rebecca E. Irwin
    Joan E. Maloof
    Oecologia, 2002, 133 : 525 - 533
  • [28] NECTAR ROBBING BY SOLITARY WASPS (HYMENOPTERA, VESPOIDEA, EUMENIDAE)
    HAESELER, V
    ENTOMOLOGIA GENERALIS, 1980, 6 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [29] Nectar robbing impacts pollinator behavior but not plant reproduction
    Hazlehurst, Jenny A.
    Karubian, Jordan O.
    OIKOS, 2016, 125 (11) : 1668 - 1676
  • [30] The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing: why be tactic constant?
    Bronstein, Judith L.
    Barker, Jessica L.
    Lichtenberg, Elinor M.
    Richardson, Leif L.
    Irwin, Rebecca E.
    CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE, 2017, 21 : 14 - 18