Nectar robbers and simulated robbing differ in their effects on nectar microbial communities

被引:1
|
作者
Luizzi, Victoria J. [1 ,5 ]
Harrington, Alison H. [1 ,2 ]
Bronstein, Judith L. [1 ]
Arnold, A. Elizabeth [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Herbarium, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Sch Plant Sci, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Inst Bio5, Tucson, AZ USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, 1041 E Lowell, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
flowers; nectar microbes; nectar robbing; plant-animal interaction; pollination biology; FLORAL NECTAR; IPOMOPSIS-AGGREGATA; POLLINATOR BEHAVIOR; FLOWERS; FITNESS; PATTERNS; REDUCE; ANTS; L;
D O I
10.1111/1442-1984.12446
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Floral nectar contains microbes that can influence nectar chemistry and pollinator visitation, and these microbial communities can be affected by pollinators in turn. Some flowers are also visited by nectar robbers, which feed on nectar through holes cut in floral tissue. If nectar robbers alter nectar microbial communities, they might have unexpected impacts on pollinator visitation. We investigated whether robbing could affect nectar microbial communities directly, by introducing microbes, or indirectly, by triggering a plant response to floral damage. We applied four treatments to flowers of Tecoma x "Orange Jubilee" (Bignoniaceae) in an arboretum setting: flowers were (1) covered to exclude all visitors; (2) available to both pollinators and nectar robbers and robbed naturally by carpenter bees; (3) available to pollinators only but cut at the base to simulate nectar robbing damage; or (4) available to pollinators only. We found that nectar in flowers accessible to any visitors was more likely to contain culturable microbes than flowers from which visitors were excluded. Microbial community composition and beta diversity were similar across treatments. Among flowers containing culturable microbes, flowers available to pollinators and nectar robbers had higher microbial abundance than flowers with simulated robbing, but there were no differences between flowers available to pollinators and robbers and unwounded flowers from which robbers were excluded. Overall, our results suggest that floral damage can affect some features of nectar microbial communities, but specific effects of nectar robbing are limited compared with the influence of visitation in general. This study experimentally tested whether nectar robbers and pollinators differ in their effects on nectar microbial communities of Tecoma x "Orange Jubilee" and whether any differences are due specifically to floral damage caused by robbing. Simulated robbing damage (but not natural robbing) decreased microbial abundance, relative to flowers from which robbers were excluded. Nectar microbial communities were otherwise similar in robbed and unrobbed flowers, and we found much greater differences between flowers that were unvisited versus flowers that received any kind of visit (robber or pollinator).image
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 137
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Legitimate visitors and nectar robbers of Aquilegia formosa have different effects on nectar bacterial communities
    Zemenick, Ash T.
    Rosenheim, Jay A.
    Vannette, Rachel L.
    ECOSPHERE, 2018, 9 (10):
  • [2] Effects of nectar robbing on nectar dynamics and bumblebee foraging strategies in Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae)
    Newman, DA
    Thomson, JD
    OIKOS, 2005, 110 (02) : 309 - 320
  • [3] Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists?
    Maloof, JE
    Inouye, DW
    ECOLOGY, 2000, 81 (10) : 2651 - 2661
  • [4] Floral Nectar Guide Patterns Discourage Nectar Robbing by Bumble Bees
    Leonard, Anne S.
    Brent, Joshua
    Papaj, Daniel R.
    Dornhaus, Anna
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02):
  • [5] Nectar robbing in the trainbearers (Lesbia, Trochilidae)
    Igic, Boris
    Nguyen, Ivory
    Fenberg, Phillip B.
    PEERJ, 2020, 8
  • [6] Are nectar-robbers mutualists or antagonists?
    Sarah C. Richardson
    Oecologia, 2004, 139 : 246 - 254
  • [7] The Sensory and Cognitive Ecology of Nectar Robbing
    Richman, Sarah K.
    Barker, Jessica L.
    Baek, Minjung
    Papaj, Daniel R.
    Irwin, Rebecca E.
    Bronstein, Judith L.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 9
  • [8] Nectar Robbing: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives
    Irwin, Rebecca E.
    Bronstein, Judith L.
    Manson, Jessamyn S.
    Richardson, Leif
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND SYSTEMATICS, VOL 41, 2010, 41 : 271 - 292
  • [9] Are nectar-robbers mutualists or antagonists?
    Richardson, SC
    OECOLOGIA, 2004, 139 (02) : 246 - 254
  • [10] Nectar robbing and plant reproduction: an interplay of positive and negative effects
    Rojas-Nossa, Sandra V.
    Sanchez, Jose Maria
    Navarro, Luis
    OIKOS, 2021, 130 (04) : 601 - 608