Do Different Types of Adhesive Agents Effect Enamel Demineralization for Orthodontic Bonding? An In Vitro Study

被引:7
|
作者
Demircioglu, Raif Murat [1 ]
Cicek, Orhan [1 ]
Comert, Fusun [2 ]
Erener, Hande [3 ]
机构
[1] Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-67100 Zonguldak, Turkiye
[2] Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Microbiol, TR-67630 Zonguldak, Turkiye
[3] Tekirdag Namik Kemal Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-59030 Tekirdag, Turkiye
关键词
orthodontics; bracket; adhesive; bond; artificial saliva; Streptococcus mutans; cariogenic environment; demineralization; DIAGNOdent; SELF-ETCHING PRIMER; WHITE SPOT LESIONS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PHOSPHORIC-ACID; CARIES; COMPOSITE; BRACKETS;
D O I
10.3390/coatings13020401
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
(1) Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the demineralization around brackets bonded with different types of adhesive agents in a cariogenic suspension environment. (2) Methods: In the study, 60 extracted upper first premolar teeth were divided into three groups with 20 teeth in each group. In Group 1, Transbond XT Primer + Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), in Group 2, GC Ortho Connect Light Cure Adhesive (GC Crop, Tokyo, Japan) and in Group 3, Transbond (TM) Plus Self Etching Primer + Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) adhesive agents were used. In Group 1 and 2, buccal enamel surfaces were etched for 30 s, washed for 15 s and dried for 15 s. All groups were bonded with Gemini metal (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) brackets. Gingival, occlusal and proximal enamel surfaces of the brackets were measured with a DIAGNOdent pen (KaVo, Biberach, Germany), and demineralization values were recorded. Measurements were performed after bracketing (T0) and after 28 days in a cariogenic environment (T1), which was renewed every 48 h. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine whether or not the data were homogeneously distributed, the Wilcoxon test was used for comparisons within groups, and the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons between groups. (3) Results: In all groups, demineralization values on all enamel surfaces of the brackets were found to be statistically significantly higher in the T1 period than in the T0 period (p < 0.05). In the T1 period, demineralization values of occlusal enamel surfaces in Groups 1 and 2 were found to be significantly higher than in Group 3 (p < 0.05). The amount of increase in occlusal enamel surface demineralization value between T0 and T1 periods in Groups 1 and 2 was significantly higher than in Group 3 (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in demineralization values of proximal and gingival enamel surfaces between the groups in the T1 period (p > 0.05). (4) Conclusion: Significantly less occlusal enamel surface demineralization was observed in teeth in which the Transbond (TM) Plus Self Etching Primer adhesive agent was not applied with acid etching.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adhesive Performance of Pit and Fissure Sealants on Deproteinized Enamel with Different Proteolytic Agents: In Vitro Study
    Garcia-Mota, Luis Francisco
    Fernandez-Barrera, Miguel-angel
    Garcia-Contreras, Rene
    Grazioli, Guillermo
    Zamarripa-Calderon, Juan Eliezer
    Rivera-Gonzaga, Jose Alejandro
    Cuevas-Suarez, Carlos Enrique
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2024, 12 (07)
  • [32] Prevention of enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment: An in vitro study using pit and fissure sealants
    Frazier, MC
    Southard, TE
    Doster, PM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 110 (05) : 459 - 465
  • [33] Effect of Fluoride Release on Enamel Demineralization Adjacent to Orthodontic Brackets
    Mahmoud, Ghiath A.
    Gordon, Peter H.
    Pretty, Iain A.
    Mccabe, John F.
    Hajeer, Mohammad Y.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [34] Enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with hybrid glass ionomer cements: An in vitro study
    Vorhies, AB
    Donly, KJ
    Staley, RN
    Wefel, JS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 114 (06) : 668 - 674
  • [35] Effect of strontium fluoride on mechanical and remineralization properties of enamel: An in-vitro study on a modified orthodontic adhesive
    Saxena, Kirti
    Ann, Chew Ming
    Azwar, Masturina Anati Binti Mohd
    Banavar, Spoorthi Ravi
    Matinlinna, Jukka
    Peters, Ove A.
    Daood, Umer
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2024, 40 (05) : 811 - 823
  • [36] Effect of iron on enamel demineralization and remineralization in vitro
    Ribeiro Pinto Alves, Karina Mirela
    Franco, Karina Simoes
    Sassaki, Kikue Takebayashi
    Rabelo Buzalaf, Marilia Afonso
    Botazzo Delbem, Alberto Carlos
    ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (11) : 1192 - 1198
  • [37] Effect of different orthodontic adhesive removal techniques on sound, demineralized and remineralized enamel
    Cochrane, N. J.
    Ratneser, S.
    Reynolds, E. C.
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2012, 57 (03) : 365 - 372
  • [38] Using Hemostatic Agents During Orthodontic Bonding: An In Vitro Study
    Akdeniz, Berat Serdar
    Oz, Abdullah Alper
    Arici, Nursel
    Demir, Onur
    Arici, Selim
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2015, 28 (02) : 38 - 43
  • [39] Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin
    Hikita, K.
    Van Meerbeek, B.
    De Munck, J.
    Ikeda, T.
    Van Landuyt, K.
    Maida, T.
    Lambrechts, P.
    Peumans, M.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2007, 23 (01) : 71 - 80
  • [40] EFFECT OF BLEACHING ON ENAMEL BONDING WITH DIFFERENT ADHESIVE PROTOCOLS & NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE
    Fahmi, M. K.
    ANNALS OF DENTAL SPECIALTY, 2018, 6 (03): : 256 - 260