Beliefs on environmental impact of wood construction

被引:6
|
作者
Roos, Anders [1 ,4 ]
Hurmekoski, Elias [2 ]
Haeyrinen, Liina [3 ]
Jussila, Jaakko [2 ]
Laehtinen, Katja [3 ]
Mark-Herbert, Cecilia [1 ]
Nagy, Emil [1 ]
Toivonen, Ritva [2 ]
Toppinen, Anne [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Econ, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Helsinki, Fac Agr & Forestry, Dept Forest Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Nat Resources Inst Finland LUKE, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Econ, Box 7060, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Attitudes; environmental marketing; communication; perceptions; Finland; Sweden; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SECTOR; RESPONSIBILITY; BUILDINGS; PRODUCTS; BEHAVIOR; EUROPE; LCA;
D O I
10.1080/02827581.2023.2168043
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
People have different beliefs about the environmental impact of forest products. This quantitative web-survey study investigated public beliefs in Finland and Sweden about the environmental and climate impacts of using wood as a construction material for multi-story buildings. It was conducted with consumer panels reflecting the average populations of the two countries. The study analyzed factors affecting beliefs that multi-story Wood Buildings: (1) contribute to mitigating global warming, and (2) adversely impact biodiversity and the climate. It used consumer panel and multivariate statistics. Favorable climate-related beliefs were associated with Finnish nationality, male gender, age, children in household, university degree, and beliefs that climate change is induced by humans and causes weather disasters. Beliefs that wood buildings drive global warming and harm biodiversity were associated with non-rural residence, female gender, young age, children in household, low income, and beliefs that climate change causes weather disasters. No associations were recorded for current residence types. These findings highlight the importance of the wood construction industry to improve, document, and communicate to the public its impact on climate and biodiversity. They also indicate how market information can be formulated and targeted to communicate an accurate environmental image of wood construction.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 57
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental impact assessment: A comparative review - Wood,C
    Petts, J
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 1997, 24 (03): : 476 - 477
  • [22] The environmental impact of wood compared to other building materials
    Hill, C. A. S.
    Dibdiakova, J.
    INTERNATIONAL WOOD PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2016, 7 (04) : 215 - 219
  • [23] Project construction and environmental impact assessment approach
    Berakovic, B
    Pletikapic, Z
    Mahmutovic, Z
    Karleusa, BK
    HYDROPOWER IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM, 2001, : 173 - 179
  • [24] Quantitative environmental impact assessment for construction projects
    Department of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Qinghua Daxue Xuebao, 2009, 9 (1484-1487):
  • [25] CRWR studies environmental impact of highway construction
    Watermarks, 1994, 30 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [26] Low environmental impact technologies for road construction
    Simone, Andrea
    IN BO-RICERCHE E PROGETTI PER IL TERRITORIO LA CITTA E L ARCHITETTURA, 2013, 4 (02): : 21 - 28
  • [27] Construction and Practice of Environmental Impact Assessment Course
    Ma, Xiangjuan
    Xia, Huilong
    2011 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND SPORTS EDUCATION (ESE 2011), VOL III, 2011, : 217 - 219
  • [28] Environmental impact of ferrochrome slag in road construction
    Lind, BB
    Fällman, AM
    Larsson, LB
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2001, 21 (03) : 255 - 264
  • [29] Modeling of Construction Noise for Environmental Impact Assessment
    Hamoda, Mohamed F.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2008, 13 (01) : 79 - 89
  • [30] Environmental Impact and Environmental Cost Assessment of Methanol Production from wood biomass
    Yadav, Pooja
    Athanassiadis, Dimitris
    Yacout, Dalia M. M.
    Tysklind, Mats
    Upadhyayula, Venkata K. K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2020, 265