Efficient non-ergodic ground-motion prediction for large datasets

被引:2
|
作者
Lacour, Maxime [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Non-ergodic; Ground-motion prediction; Ground-motion inference; Sparse matrix; Efficient numerical method; STANDARD-DEVIATION; MODELS; SITE;
D O I
10.1007/s10518-022-01402-2
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
An efficient numerical method for non-ergodic ground-motion inference and prediction is proposed that alleviates the large computational and memory requirements associated with the traditional approach based on Gaussian Processes described in Landwehr et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160118, 2016). The method uses the latest developments in Gaussian Processes and Machine Learning from Wilson and Nickisch (in: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp 1775-1784, 2015) (SKI) and Gardner et al. (in: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 1407-1416, 2018) (SKIP) and uses sparse approximations combined with efficient matrix decompositions to accurately approximate the large covariance matrices involved in the calculations. This efficient method can be used for both inference of hyperparameters of the non-ergodic ground-motion models and for forward predictions of non-ergodic median ground-motion. The application to predictions are presented. For large datasets of 100,000 to 1,000,000 ground motion values, the proposed method increases the computation speed by factors of 100 to 1000, reducing run times from days to minutes. In addition, the memory requirements are reduced from hundreds of GB to a few GB only, which makes the development of non-ergodic ground-motion models practical using traditional desktop computers.
引用
收藏
页码:5209 / 5232
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ground-motion prediction model building: a multilevel approach
    N. M. Kuehn
    F. Scherbaum
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 13 : 2481 - 2491
  • [32] A Ground-Motion Prediction Equation for Fennoscandian Nuclear Installations
    Fulop, Ludovic
    Jussila, Vilho
    Aapasuo, Riina
    Vuorinen, Tommi
    Mantyniemi, Paivi
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 110 (03) : 1211 - 1230
  • [33] Ground-motion prediction model building: a multilevel approach
    Kuehn, N. M.
    Scherbaum, F.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2015, 13 (09) : 2481 - 2491
  • [34] The Variability of Ground-Motion Prediction Models and Its Components
    Al Atik, Linda
    Abrahamson, Norman
    Bommer, Julian J.
    Scherbaum, Frank
    Cotton, Fabrice
    Kuehn, Nicolas
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 81 (05) : 794 - 801
  • [35] Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for South Korea Peninsula
    Emolo, Antonio
    Sharma, Nitin
    Festa, Gaetano
    Zollo, Aldo
    Convertito, Vincenzo
    Park, Jung-Ho
    Chi, Heon-Cheol
    Lim, In-Seub
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2015, 105 (05) : 2625 - 2640
  • [36] Ground-Motion Prediction Equation for the Chilean Subduction Zone
    Montalva, Gonzalo A.
    Bastias, Nicolas
    Rodriguez-Marek, Adrian
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2017, 107 (02) : 901 - 911
  • [37] Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for northern Iran
    Yazdani, Azad
    Kowsari, Milad
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 69 (03) : 1877 - 1894
  • [38] The influence of magnitude range on empirical ground-motion prediction
    Bommer, Julian J.
    Stafford, Peter J.
    Alarcon, John E.
    Akkar, Sinan
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 97 (06) : 2152 - 2170
  • [39] Partially non-ergodic ground motion model for the Bucaramanga seismic nest in Northern South America (NoSAm Nest GMM)
    Pajaro, Cesar A.
    Arteta, Carlos A.
    Mercado, Vicente
    Montejo, Julian
    Arcila, Monica
    Abrahamson, Norman A.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 22 (08) : 3677 - 3702
  • [40] PREDICTION OF LEVEL-CROSSINGS FOR PROCESSES CONTAINING NON-ERGODIC COMPONENTS
    LINDGREN, G
    ADVANCES IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 1978, 10 (02) : 290 - 291