Humanization: The humanistic perspective as a guide for supporting people with intellectual disability

被引:1
|
作者
Neuman, Ran [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zefat Acad Coll, Dept Special Educ, Zfat, Israel
[2] Zefat Acad Coll, Dept Social Work, Zfat, Israel
[3] Zefat Acad Coll, Dept Special Educ, IL-13206 Zfat, Israel
[4] Zefat Acad Coll, Dept Social Work, IL-13206 Zfat, Israel
关键词
a holistic model of support; autonomy; direct support providers; humanistic perspective; intellectual disability; theoretical principles; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SOCIAL INCLUSION; SELF-DETERMINATION; AUTONOMY; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1111/bld.12568
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
BackgroundDespite humanistic declarations regarding the rights of people with intellectual disability to live a full, meaningful life, in practice, resulting from dilemmas experienced by direct support provides, support is often limited to a focus on functional independence. The aim of this research was to define the theoretical principles by which the gap between humanistic declarations and practice can be overcome.MethodThe research focused on the role perception of 30 direct support providers who participated in semistructured interviews. A case study methodology was used applying an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA).FindingsThe interviews revealed that a humanistic perspective has been partially incorporated into the general attitudes of direct support providers. In practice, however, they indicated that they face dilemmas that challenge them in their daily work.ConclusionTo assist direct support providers in resolving their dilemmas, by adhering to humanistic principles, a 'humanization' model is offered. The theoretical principles underlying the model focus on meaningful life as the aim of support, enhancing recipients' autonomy, adhering to a holistic perspective and conducting dialogues acknowledging the abilities of people with intellectual disability to understand, choose and face challenges. Further examination of the model and its application in practice is recommended. When providing supports to adults with intellectual disability it is sometimes difficult to choose between conflicting demands, such as: Providing either a safe and comfortable environment or a challenging one.To assist direct support providers in resolving dilemmas in their support of adults with intellectual disability, the 'humanization' model suggested here, offers four theoretical principles:Meaningful life-It is important to enable and encourage the support user to face new experiences and practice decision-making for personal meaning in life.Autonomy-Individuals with intellectual disability can and are entitled to make their own decisions. They should be encouraged to develop and express their priorities according to their personal worldview.Holistic perspective (Taking a Broad Perspective)-Individuals with intellectual disability are more than their abilities and difficulties; they are whole and one-of-a-kind.Interaction based on dialogue-The dialogue is based first and foremost on conversation that acknowledge the abilities of people with intellectual disability to understand, choose and face challenges.It is hoped that by applying the model, that direct support providers will be able to provide better assistance to adults with intellectual disability to seek personal meaning in their lives.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 224
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The friendships of people with intellectual disability
    Callus, A. M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 27 (04) : 346 - 346
  • [32] People with intellectual disability and cancer
    Skorpen, Stine
    JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2008, 5 (01) : 30 - 30
  • [33] Pain in people with an intellectual disability
    McGuire, Brian E.
    Kennedy, Susan
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 26 (03) : 270 - 275
  • [34] Codesigning with People with Intellectual Disability
    Newman, Bronwyn
    Mimmo, Laurel
    Van Hoeke, Matthew
    Tokutake, Maya
    Phillips, Karen
    Van Hoek, Debbie
    Bowen, Kim
    Manias, Elizabeth
    Paterson, Pandora
    Harrison, Reema
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 20 : 74 - 74
  • [35] People with Intellectual Disability and ICTs
    Gutierrez, Pedro
    Martorell, Almudena
    COMUNICAR, 2011, 18 (36) : 173 - 180
  • [36] Parkinsonism in people with intellectual disability
    Boot, Erik
    Eeghen, Agnies M. van
    Bloem, Bas R.
    van de Warrenburg, Bart P.
    Cuypers, Maarten
    PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2024, 128
  • [37] Implementing proposed reforms of the Mental Health Act for people with intellectual disability and autism: the perspective of multidisciplinary professionals in intellectual disability teams
    Velani, Bharat
    Sawhney, Indermeet
    Alexander, Regi T.
    Shardlow, Sophie
    Zia, Asif
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2022, 8 (06):
  • [38] Facilitators, barriers, and strategies for supporting shared decision-making with people with intellectual disability: A West Australian primary healthcare professional perspective
    Teale, Kathryn
    Lewis, Abigail
    Skoss, Rachel
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 2024,
  • [39] The Importance of Self-Determination to the Quality of Life of People with Intellectual Disability: A Perspective
    Wehmeyer, Michael L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (19) : 1 - 7
  • [40] Towards an environmental perspective on intervention for problem sexual behaviour in people with an intellectual disability
    OConnor, W
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 1997, 10 (02) : 159 - 175