Logistics choices in a platform supply chain: A co-opetitive perspective

被引:12
|
作者
Wang, Pei [1 ]
Du, Shaofu [1 ]
Hu, Li [2 ]
Tang, Wenzhi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Hefei Univ, Hefei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Supply chain; e-commerce; game theory; logistics; retailing; CHANNEL; ONLINE; COORDINATION; MARKETPLACE; COMPETITION; IMPACT; RETAIL; PRICE;
D O I
10.1080/01605682.2021.2023675
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
With the popularity and development of the platform economy, numerous enterprises are choosing to cooperate with e-commerce platforms to expand online market, and the cooperation modes have exhibited innovation and diversification. This paper focuses on a new platform-based co-opetitive supply chain whereby a flagship store operated by the manufacturer (MFS) and a self-run store operated by the platform (PSS) coexist in the platform market. The manufacturer acts as the platform's upstream contract manufacturer and downstream competitor. We answer a key question that the manufacturers are facing: when should they adopt the high-level logistics service (HLS) provided by the platform? Two cases with exogenous and endogenous HLS charge are analyzed respectively. Our results show that under the case of exogenous HLS charge, the manufacturer should always select HLS when the HLS charge is low. Counterintuitively, if the product's market potential is limited, the HLS is still profitable for the manufacturer despite a high HLS charge. When the HLS charge is endogenous, we find that the platform can adjust the HLS charge to induce the manufacturers to give up low-level logistics service (LLS) and choose HLS, which will achieve a win-win situation.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 111
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Supply Chain Logistics Platform as a Supply Chain Coordination Support
    Grzybowska, Katarzyna
    Gajsek, Brigita
    [J]. HIGHLIGHTS OF PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF SCALABLE MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2016, 616 : 61 - 72
  • [22] A co-opetitive framework for the hub location problems in transportation networks
    Monemi, Rahimeh Neamatian
    Gelareh, Shahin
    Hanafi, Said
    Maculan, Nelson
    [J]. OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 66 (12) : 2089 - 2106
  • [23] Relational contracting and the myth of trust: Control in a co-opetitive setting
    Grafton, Jennifer
    Mundy, Julia
    [J]. MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2017, 36 : 24 - 42
  • [24] A co-opetitive newsvendor model with product substitution and a wholesale price contract
    Dong, Binwei
    Ren, Yufei
    McIntosh, Christopher
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 311 (02) : 502 - 514
  • [25] Channel Structure Design for Complementary Products under a Co-Opetitive Environment
    Pun, Hubert
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCES, 2013, 44 (04) : 785 - 796
  • [26] Virtual, wireless mannah: a co-opetitive analysis of the broadband satellite industry
    Carayannis, EG
    Alexander, J
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2001, 21 (12) : 759 - 766
  • [27] Respecting the Deal: How to Manage Co-opetitive Actors in Open Innovation
    Bonazzi, Riccardo
    Hussami, Lotfi
    Bienz, Pius
    Pigneur, Yves
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF THE INTERCONNECTED WORLD, 2010, : 421 - 428
  • [28] Balancing between risks and benefits of knowledge sharing in co-opetitive knowledge networks
    Ilvonen, Ilona
    Vuori, Vilma
    [J]. IFKAD 2013: 8TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: SMART GROWTH: ORGANIZATIONS, CITIES AND COMMUNITIES, 2013, : 1589 - 1607
  • [29] Model selection and decisions optimization of sharing manufacturing under co-opetitive relationships
    Jiang, Zhong-Zhong
    Lin, Qun-Geng
    He, Na
    Zang, Yuan-Ji
    [J]. Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2023, 38 (08): : 2401 - 2414
  • [30] A Co-Opetitive Automated Negotiation Model for Vertical Allied Enterprises Teams and Stakeholders
    Gao, Taiguang
    Wang, Qing
    Huang, Min
    Wang, Xingwei
    Zhang, Yu
    [J]. ENTROPY, 2018, 20 (04):