An improved risk priority number model for FMEA based on belief measure

被引:2
|
作者
Tang, Yongchuan [1 ]
Tan, Shiting [2 ]
Zhou, Ying [3 ]
Huang, Yubo [4 ]
Zhou, Deyun [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Microelect, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Chongqing 401331, Peoples R China
[3] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Elect & Informat, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Warwick, Sch Engn, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
关键词
Failure mode and effects analysis; risk priority number; belief Jensen-Shannon divergence measure; Dempster-Shafer evidence theory; uncertainty management; FAILURE MODE; DECISION-MAKING; ENTROPY; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1109/CCDC58219.2023.10326506
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Decision making under uncertainty in risk analysis is a key issue in practical engineering. The risk priority number (RPN) model in failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a widely used tool for ranking of risk items. However, there are limitations in the traditional RPN model. For example, it cannot represent the subjective or inaccurate judgements coming from FMEA experts. In addition, the uncertainty in the assessments of experts in FMEA item is not modelled and transformed to the RPN values. In this paper, a new risk priority number model based on belief Jensen-Shannon divergence measure and Deng entropy in Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is proposed. In the proposed method, the belief Jensen-Shannon divergence measure is adopted to effectively deal with the fuzziness and abnormal adjustment coming from all the FMEA experts. In addition, Deng entropy is used to quantify the uncertain degree of each expert and the result is modelled as a relative importance degree of expert. Dempster's combination rule is used to fuse experts' assessments of different failure modes to generate the integrated values of each risk factor. The rationality, superiority and effectiveness of the proposed RPN model are verified based on a case study of a production process in steel industry.
引用
收藏
页码:3940 / 3945
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk Analysis of Propulsion System based on Similarity Measure and Weighted Fuzzy Risk Priority Number in FMEA
    Zhou, Hang
    Yang, Yuan-Jian
    Huang, Hong-Zhong
    Li, Yan-Feng
    Mi, Jinhua
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TURBO & JET-ENGINES, 2021, 38 (02) : 163 - 172
  • [2] Fuzzy-based risk priority number in FMEA for semiconductor wafer processes
    Yeh, Tsu-Ming
    Chen, Long-Yi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (02) : 539 - 549
  • [3] An Improved Risk Priority Number Method Based on AHP
    Zhao, Youhu
    Fu, Guicui
    Wan, Bo
    [J]. 59TH ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS), 2013,
  • [4] The Risk Priority Number Evaluation of FMEA Analysis Based on Random Uncertainty and Fuzzy Uncertainty
    Wu, Xiaojun
    Wu, Jing
    [J]. COMPLEXITY, 2021, 2021
  • [5] Utility Priority Number Evaluation for FMEA
    Yu Cheng Lee
    Jih Kuang Chen
    [J]. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2007, 7 (5) : 329 - 329
  • [6] Utility Priority Number Evaluation for FMEA
    Chen, Jih Kuang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAILURE ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2007, 7 (05) : 321 - 328
  • [7] AN IMPROVED RISK PRIORITY MEASURE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PROJECT RISK
    Unwin, Stephen D.
    Calderin, Duriem
    Simpson, Brett C.
    Spitz, Casey J.
    Veeramany, Arun
    Gastelum, Jason A.
    Maloney, Craig T.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2020, VOL 14, 2020,
  • [8] Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA
    Xiao, Ningcong
    Huang, Hong-Zhong
    Li, Yanfeng
    He, Liping
    Jin, Tongdan
    [J]. ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2011, 18 (04) : 1162 - 1170
  • [9] AMWRPN: Ambiguity Measure Weighted Risk Priority Number Model for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
    Tang, Yongchuan
    Zhou, Deyun
    Chan, Felix T. S.
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 27103 - 27110
  • [10] Improvement of the Risk Assessment System Based on the FMEA Action Priority Method
    Panyukov, D.I.
    Nenashev, M.V.
    Kozlovskii, V.N.
    Aidarov, D.V.
    [J]. Russian Engineering Research, 2024, 44 (07) : 1030 - 1034