共 50 条
Reporting antimicrobial susceptibilities and phenotypes of resistance to vancomycin in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. clinical isolates: A nationwide proficiency study
被引:0
|作者:
Fernandez-Cuenca, Felipe
[1
,2
,3
]
Lopez-Hernandez, Inmaculada
[1
,2
,3
]
Cercenado, Emilia
[4
,5
,6
]
Conejo, Maria Carmen
[7
]
Tormo, Nuria
[8
,9
]
Gimeno, Concepcion
[8
,9
]
Pascual, Alvaro
[1
,2
,3
,7
]
机构:
[1] Hosp Univ Virgen Macarena, Unidad Clin Enfermedades Infecciosas & Microbiol C, Seville, Spain
[2] Univ Seville, Hosp Univ Virgen Macarena, Inst Biomed Sevilla IBIs, CSIC, Seville, Spain
[3] Inst Salud Carlos III, Spanish Network Res Infect Dis REIPI RD16 0016, Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Serv Microbiol & Enfermedades Infecciosas, Madrid, Spain
[5] Univ Complutense, Fac Med, Dept Med, Madrid, Spain
[6] Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Resp, CIBERES, CB06 06 0058, Madrid, Spain
[7] Univ Seville, Dept Microbiol, Seville, Spain
[8] Hosp Gen Valencia, Serv Microbiol, Valencia, Spain
[9] Spanish Soc Clin Microbiol & Infect Dis SEIMC, Qual Control Programme CCS, Valencia, Spain
来源:
关键词:
Enterococcus spp;
Quality control;
Vancomycin resistance;
Antimicrobial susceptibility;
National multicenter study;
TEICOPLANIN RESISTANCE;
VITEK;
2;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
INFECTIONS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.eimc.2021.11.011
中图分类号:
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号:
100401 ;
摘要:
Introduction: The ability of Spanish microbiology laboratories to (a) determine antimicrobial suscepti-bility (AS), and (b) correctly detect the vancomycin resistance (VR) phenotype in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE) was evaluated.Methods: Three VRE isolates representing the VanA (E. faecium), VanB (E. faecium) and VanC (E. gallinarum) VR phenotypes were sent to 52 laboratories, which were asked for: (a) AS method used; (b) MICs of ampicillin, imipenem, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, daptomycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and quinupristin-dalfopristin, and high-level resistance to gentamicin and streptomycin; (c) VR phenotype.Results: (a) The most frequently used system was MicroScan; (b) according to the system, the highest percentage of discrepant MICs was found with gradient strips (21.3%). By antimicrobial, the high-est rates of discrepant MICs ranged 16.7% (imipenem) to 0.7% (linezolid). No discrepant MICs were obtained with daptomycin or levofloxacin. Mayor errors (MEs) occurred with linezolid (1.1%/EUCAST) and ciprofloxacin (5.0%/CLSI), and very major errors (VMEs) with vancomycin (27.1%/EUCAST and 33.3%/CLSI) and teicoplanin (5.7%/EUCAST and 2.3%/CLSI). For linezolid, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin, discrepant MICs were responsible for these errors, while for teicoplanin, errors were due to a misassignment of the clinical category. An unacceptable high percentage of VMEs was obtained using gradient strips (14.8%), especially with vancomycin, teicoplanin and daptomycin; (c) 86.4% of the centers identified VanA and VanB phenotypes correctly, and 95.0% the VanC phenotype.Conclusion: Most Spanish microbiology laboratories can reliably determine AS in VRE, but there is a significant percentage of inadequate interpretations (warning of false susceptibility) for teicoplanin in isolates with the VanB phenotype.& COPY; 2021 Sociedad Espanola de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologi & PRIME;a Cli & PRIME;nica. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 341
页数:7
相关论文