The impact mechanism of China's carbon emission trading policy on industrial energy efficiency under multiple innovation approaches

被引:3
|
作者
Li, Jinqiu [1 ]
Huang, Dechun [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
carbon emission trading; multiple innovation approaches; industrial energy efficiency; super-EBM; difference-in-difference model; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fenrg.2022.1000429
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Under the "dual carbon " background, carbon emission trading policy, as an important means of environmental regulation for energy conservation, emission reduction and green development, has a very important impact on energy efficiency. We take China's pilot carbon trading policy, which began in 2013, as an example, and the energy efficiency of industrial enterprises from 2008 to 2019 as a study sample. In this paper, the single factor industrial energy efficiency (ISE) and the green total factor industrial energy efficiency (IGTE) in China are both included in the influence category of carbon emission trading. The SUPER-EBM method is used to measure IGTE. The direct effects of carbon emission trading policy on the two types of industrial energy efficiency are investigated by Difference-in-difference model combined with stepwise regression method. The dynamic effects are studied by event study method. In order to verify how the "Porter effect " plays a role in this process, this paper examines the influence paths of five important innovation-related intermediate mechanisms. The study find that after a series of robustness tests, such as parallel trend test, placebo test, changing the time window frame and adding control variables, carbon emission trading policy significantly improved the two energy efficiency. The effect of carbon trading policy gradually increased and reached its maximum in the fifth year, but then began to decline. Under multiple innovation approaches, innovation environment level and innovation protection intensity can significantly improve the two energy efficiency. Green innovation intensity and breakthrough innovation intensity improved ISE. The overall level of enterprise innovation improved IGTE. Heterogeneity analysis shows that carbon trading policy has a greater impact on the eastern region, but a smaller impact on the central and western regions. This paper provides differentiated policy inspiration for the overall promotion of China's national carbon market in the future.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China
    Zhang, Wei
    Li, Jing
    Li, Guoxiang
    Guo, Shucen
    ENERGY, 2020, 196
  • [22] The impact of China's carbon trading policy on enterprises' energy-saving behavior
    Zhou, Qianling
    Cui, Xiaoyong
    Ni, Hongfu
    Gong, Liutang
    Mao, Shengzhi
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (02)
  • [23] China's failure of policy innovation: the case of sulphur dioxide emission trading
    Shin, Sangbum
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2013, 22 (06) : 918 - 934
  • [24] Policy spillover effect and action mechanism for environmental rights trading on green innovation: Evidence from China's carbon emissions trading policy
    Liu, Yunqiang
    Liu, Sha
    Shao, Xiaoyu
    He, Yanqiu
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 153
  • [25] Can China's energy quota trading impact the market performance and policy effects of carbon emissions trading?
    Chen, Haowei
    Zhao, Xin-gang
    Hu, Shuran
    Xu, Xi
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [26] Does the coexistence of carbon emission trading and energy efficiency trading make sense? The case of China
    Li, Jia-lin
    Chi, Yuan-ying
    Li, Yuan
    Pang, Yuexia
    Jin, Feng
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 710 - 721
  • [27] Re-examining the effect of carbon emission trading policy on improving the green innovation of China’s enterprises
    Shuwang Yang
    Tingshuai Lu
    Tiancheng Huang
    Chao Wang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 7696 - 7717
  • [28] Re-examining the effect of carbon emission trading policy on improving the green innovation of China's enterprises
    Yang, Shuwang
    Lu, Tingshuai
    Huang, Tiancheng
    Wang, Chao
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (03) : 7696 - 7717
  • [29] Does China’s carbon emission trading policy improve regional energy efficiency?—an analysis based on quasi-experimental and policy spillover effects
    Xue-mei Zhang
    Fei-fei Lu
    Dan Xue
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 21166 - 21183
  • [30] Does China's carbon emission trading policy improve regional energy efficiency?-an analysis based on quasi-experimental and policy spillover effects
    Zhang, Xue-mei
    Lu, Fei-fei
    Xue, Dan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (14) : 21166 - 21183