The Effects of Inquiry and Argumentation-Based Training on Argumentation, Inquiry and Science Process Skills

被引:0
|
作者
Higde, Emrah [1 ]
Aktamis, Hilal [1 ]
机构
[1] Aydin Adnan Menderes Univ, Educ Fac, Aydin, Turkiye
来源
PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION | 2023年 / 59期
关键词
argumentation; science process skills; science education; inquiry; SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION; DRIVEN INQUIRY; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.9779/pauefd.1073144
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of argumentation and inquiry-based science education on pre-service science teachers' skills of argumentation, inquiry and scientific process. To find out the influences of independent variables (argumentation and inquiry-based activities) on dependent variables (argumentation skill, inquiry skill and scientific process skill) for the aim of the study, a counterbalanced experimental design was used. Forty-eight pre-service science teachers who took the science education laboratory applications course, randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups, participated in the study. The argumentation and inquiry-based science training were applied by making a counterbalanced design to create equal conditions for both groups and to control the ordering effect. Data were analyzed by using t-test and single-factor ANOVA for repeated measures. The findings indicate that the argumentation activities significantly differentiated the argumentation skills while the inquiry activities significantly differentiated the inquiry skills, regardless of the order and group of interventions. It was concluded that science process skills developed significantly after both argumentation and inquiry-based activities, regardless of the order of implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Argumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory: Inquiry and Confirmatory Experiments
    Dvora Katchevich
    Avi Hofstein
    Rachel Mamlok-Naaman
    Research in Science Education, 2013, 43 : 317 - 345
  • [42] TOOLS OF SOCIAL INQUIRY: ARGUMENTATION, DISCUSSION AND DEBATE
    Auer, J. Jeffery
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF SPEECH, 1939, 25 (04) : 533 - 539
  • [43] Argumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory: Inquiry and Confirmatory Experiments
    Katchevich, Dvora
    Hofstein, Avi
    Mamlok-Naaman, Rachel
    RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2013, 43 (01) : 317 - 345
  • [44] Inquiry and argumentation skill development work in conjunction
    Xiao, Si
    Kuhn, Deanna
    COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 71
  • [45] Argumentation-Based Probabilistic Causal Reasoning
    Bengel, Lars
    Bluemel, Lydia
    Rienstra, Tjitze
    Thimm, Matthias
    ROBUST ARGUMENTATION MACHINES, RATIO 2024, 2024, 14638 : 221 - 236
  • [46] Argumentation-based communication between agents
    Parsons, S
    McBurney, P
    COMMUNICATION IN MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS: AGENT COMMUNICATION LANGUAGES AND CONVERSATION POLICIES, 2003, 2650 : 164 - 178
  • [47] A general framework for argumentation-based negotiation
    Amgoud, Leila
    Dimopoulos, Yannis
    Moraitis, Pavlos
    ARGUMENTATION IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2008, 4946 : 1 - 17
  • [48] An Argumentation-Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case
    Prakken, Henry
    TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (04) : 1068 - 1091
  • [49] Mechanism Design for Argumentation-based Persuasion
    Fan, Xiuyi
    Toni, Francesca
    COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2012, 245 : 322 - 333
  • [50] Tactics and Concessions for Argumentation-based Negotiation
    Hadidi, Nabila
    Dimopoulos, Yannis
    Moraitis, Pavlos
    COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2012, 245 : 285 - +