Students' Motivation for Honors Programs in the Netherlands

被引:0
|
作者
Basnet, Neha [1 ,4 ]
Wouters, Anouk [1 ,2 ]
Kusurkar, Rashmi A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam UMC locat Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Res Educ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, LEARN Res Inst Learning & Educ, Fac Psychol & Educ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Qual Care, Amsterdam Publ Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] locat Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Res Educ, POb 7057, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
SAGE OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
honors programs; higher education; motivation; motivational types; cross-sectional study; The Netherlands; SELF-DETERMINATION; HIGHER-EDUCATION; PROFILES; PARTICIPATION; PERFORMANCE; GENDER;
D O I
10.1177/21582440231218097
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study aimed to examine student motivation for honors programs using two types of motivation (autonomous and controlled) of Dutch traditional students, Dutch non-traditional students, and international students. Data were collected using Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A). K-means cluster analysis with autonomous and controlled motivation was conducted to identify the various types of motivation clusters. Subsequently, motivational profiles were compared using Analysis of Variance between Dutch traditional students, non-traditional students, and international students. Furthermore, associations between background variables and relative autonomous motivation of students to participate in the honors program were conducted. The response rate was 33.25% (n = 399). Four motivational profiles were identified: (1) HAMC (High Autonomous and Moderate Controlled), (2) HALC (High Autonomous and Low Controlled), (3) MALC (Moderate Autonomous and Low Controlled), (4) and MAMC (Moderate Autonomous and Moderate Controlled). Most of the honors program students in this study were represented in the good quality-HALC motivational profile. The findings also showed higher proportions of males (n = 71, 48%) and females (n = 120, 49.4%) in the good quality-HALC motivation profiles. Almost half of the students were found in the good quality cluster. This study aimed to examine student motivation for honors programs using two types of motivation (autonomous and controlled) of Dutch traditional students, Dutch non-traditional students and international students. Data were collected using Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A). K-means cluster analysis with autonomous and controlled motivation was conducted to identify the various types of motivation clusters. Subsequently, motivational profiles were compared using Analysis of Variance between Dutch traditional students, non-traditional students and international students. Furthermore, associations between background variables and relative autonomous motivation of students to participate in the honors program were conducted. The response rate was 33.25% (n = 399). Four motivational profiles were identified: (1) HAMC (High Autonomous and Moderate Controlled), (2) HALC (High Autonomous and Low Controlled), (3) MALC (Moderate Autonomous and Low Controlled), (4) and MAMC (Moderate Autonomous and Moderate Controlled). Most of the honors program students in this study were represented in the good quality-HALC motivational profile. The findings also showed higher proportions of males (n = 71, 48%) and females (n = 120, 49.4%) in the good quality-HALC motivation profiles. Almost half of the students were found in the good quality cluster.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条