Can convertible metal-backed glenoid components replace cemented polyethylene glenoid components in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty?

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Myung-Sun [1 ]
Ahn, Yeong-Seub [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Sun-Ho [1 ]
Jeong, Hyeon Jang [2 ]
Kim, Young Kyu [4 ]
Oh, Joo Han [2 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Chonnam Natl Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Gwangju, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seongnam, South Korea
[3] Good Morning Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Pyeongtaek, South Korea
[4] Bundang Jesaeng Gen Hosp, Daejin Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seongnam, South Korea
关键词
Cemented polyethylene component; Convertible metal-backed component; Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty; Revision arthroplasty; PRIMARY GLENOHUMERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS; CROSS-LINKED POLYETHYLENE; MULTICENTER; INSERT; WEAR;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-023-02092-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAnatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) has been used to manage degenerative diseases such as primary osteoarthritis. An increase in the use of this procedure has led to several developments in humeral and glenoid components to improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of the newly-introduced convertible metal-backed glenoid components with cemented polyethylene glenoid components in aTSA, and to determine whether the new component would be comparable to a conventional one for reducing the burden of future revision or conversion surgeries.MethodsMedical records of fifty patients who underwent aTSA with at least two years of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Eighteen patients received convertible metal-backed glenoid components with vitamin E1-coated liner (MB group), while thirty-two patients received conventional cemented polyethylene glenoid components (PE group). Pre- and postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes (acromion-greater tuberosity angle [AGA] and humeral lateral offset [LO]) at final follow-up were assessed. Radiolucent lines (RLLs) and loosening around the humeral and glenoid components were also evaluated.ResultsClinical outcomes improved after surgery in both groups (all p < 0.001). The arc of rotation measured by AGA improved postoperatively in both groups (all p < 0.001), and AGA and LO were not different according to the type of glenoid components (all p > 0.05). Overall complication rates including RLLs of PE and MB groups were 43.8% (14/32) and 16.7% (3/18), respectively (p = 0.031). Although the PE group had more RLLs than did the MB group (p < 0.05), related symptoms and/or glenoid implant loosening were not observed in both groups. Subscapularis failure occurred in two patients in the PE group and in one in the MB group.ConclusionThe convertible metal-backed glenoid implant with vitamin E1-coated liner may be a good alternative for considering the potential for an easier conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can convertible metal-backed glenoid components replace cemented polyethylene glenoid components in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty?
    Myung-Sun Kim
    Yeong-Seub Ahn
    Sun-Ho Lee
    Hyeon Jang Jeong
    Young Kyu Kim
    Joo Han Oh
    BMC Surgery, 23
  • [2] Outcomes of Trabecular Metal-backed glenoid components in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
    Watson, Scott T.
    Gudger, Garland K., Jr.
    Long, Catherine D.
    Tokish, John M.
    Tolan, Stefan J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (03) : 493 - 498
  • [3] High Complication and Revision Rates in Anatomical Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with the Combination of Polyethylene and Cementless Convertible Metal-Backed Glenoid Components: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Hanisch, Klaus W. J.
    ORTHOPEDIC RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2024, 16 : 93 - 101
  • [4] The case for the metal-backed glenoid design in total anatomical shoulder arthroplasty
    Katz, Denis C.
    Sauzieres, P.
    Valenti, P.
    Kany, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01): : 9 - 16
  • [5] The case for the metal-backed glenoid design in total anatomical shoulder arthroplasty
    Denis C. Katz
    P. Sauzières
    P. Valenti
    J. Kany
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2012, 22 : 9 - 16
  • [6] Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty:: A prospective, double-blind, randomized study
    Boileau, P
    Avidor, C
    Krishnan, SG
    Walch, G
    Kempf, JF
    Molé, D
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (04) : 351 - 359
  • [7] Long-Term Results of Cemented Metal-Backed Glenoid Components for Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder
    Tammachote, Nattapol
    Sperling, John W.
    Vathana, Torpon
    Cofield, Robert H.
    Harmsen, W. Scott
    Schleck, Cathy D.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (01): : 160 - 166
  • [8] Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis ALL-POLYETHYLENE VERSUS METAL-BACKED GLENOID
    Gauci, M. O.
    Bonnevialle, N.
    Moineau, G.
    Baba, M.
    Walch, G.
    Boileau, P.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (04): : 485 - 492
  • [9] Modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: What is the evidence? A systematic review
    Malahias, Michael-Alexander
    Chytas, Dimitrios
    Kostretzis, Lazaros
    Trellopoulos, Angelos
    Brilakis, Emmanouil
    Antonogiannakis, Emmanouil
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2021, 13 (01) : 29 - 37
  • [10] Risk factors for loosening of cemented glenoid components in anatomical shoulder arthroplasty
    Raiss, Patric
    Loew, Markus
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Favard, Luc
    Boileau, Pascal
    Walch, Gilles
    OBERE EXTREMITAET-SCHULTER-ELLENBOGEN-HAND-UPPER EXTREMITY-SHOULDER ELBOW HAND, 2019, 14 (03): : 197 - 201