Suitable contract instruments and intellectual property valuation methodologies for industry-university collaboration

被引:0
|
作者
Malherbe, Cornelia [1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Schutte, Cornelius S. L. [3 ]
Verhoef, Gerardus [4 ]
Meyer, Petrie [5 ]
Doubell, Theodorus [6 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Div Res Dev, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[3] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[4] Univ Johannesburg, UJINVNT, Johannesburg, South Africa
[5] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[6] Bouwers Intellectual Property Attorneys, Johannesburg, South Africa
[7] Stellenbosch Univ, Div Res Dev, Krotoa Bldg Room 2035,Victoria St, ZA-7601 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[8] Stellenbosch Univ, Div Res Dev, ZA-7601 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[9] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Ind Engn, ZA-7601 Stellenbosch, South Africa
关键词
Industry; university; contracts; intellectual property; valuation;
D O I
10.1177/09504222231185556
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We propose and evaluate contractual- and Intellectual Property (IP) instruments in support of research collaboration partnerships between universities and the Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMME)-industry, and more specifically in the South African context. Interviews were conducted with executives from 11 South African originated SMME's in the high-technology industry. The findings of this study and potential solutions were then verified and validated with SMME's, large multinational industry and universities (in South Africa and international) and can be considered as good practice principles to assist in industry-university collaboration (IUC). One aspect that was reported with high occurrence, is the matter of IP valuation, as it can often create further barriers in IUC. The question regarding how to value the IP and any rights relating thereto (IPR's), is attended to in this study and shared experiences from industry and universities provide insights in the considerations and principles to be used when entering discussions regarding IP valuation.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 163
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Industry-University Intellectual Property Paradox
    Haupt, Randy L.
    IEEE ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION MAGAZINE, 2006, 48 (02) : 134 - 135
  • [2] IS INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY RESEARCH COLLABORATION POSSIBLE
    BRONWELL, AB
    ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 1972, 62 (08): : 938 - &
  • [3] Best Practices for Industry-University Collaboration
    Pertuze, Julio A.
    Calder, Edward S.
    Greitzer, Edward M.
    Lucas, William A.
    MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 51 (04) : 83 - 90
  • [4] Successful industry-university collaboration.
    Jaffe, M
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1997, 213 : 141 - PMSE
  • [5] Positive Knowledge Externalities In An Industry-University Collaboration
    Emmanuel Flores, Ricardo
    Rodriguez Aceves, Luca A.
    Javier Carrillo, Francisco
    IFKAD - KCWS 2012: 7TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS, 5TH KNOWLEDGE CITIES WORLD SUMMIT: KNOWLEDGE, INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY: INTEGRATING MICRO & MACRO PERSPECTIVES, 2012, : 1705 - 1732
  • [6] The Research of Industry-University Collaboration in Market Economy
    Zhao, Y.
    Zeng, W.
    Wan, Z. C.
    FUNCTIONAL MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES AND CEEUSRO I, 2010, 426-427 : 316 - +
  • [7] Literacy in the Workplace: an example of industry-university collaboration
    Leach, Linda
    Zepke, Nick
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2005, 57 (02): : 203 - 217
  • [8] Industry-university collaboration by Canadian manufacturing firms
    Hanel P.
    St-Pierre M.
    The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2006, 31 (4) : 485 - 499
  • [9] AN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY COLLABORATION EXPERIENCE ON A SENIOR PROJECT
    Dave, Janak
    Dong, Janet
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION (IMECE 2010), VOL 6, 2012, : 271 - 274
  • [10] Industry-university collaboration in innovative process management
    Holmes, ME
    AAAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY YEARBOOK 1998, 1997, : 259 - 264