Analysis of Appeal for Realistic AI-Generated Photos

被引:10
|
作者
Goering, Steve [1 ]
Rao, Rakesh Rao Ramachandra [1 ]
Merten, Rasmus [1 ]
Raake, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Ilmenau, Audiovisual Technol Grp, D-98693 Ilmenau, Germany
关键词
Image appeal; AI-generated images; image aesthetic;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3267968
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
AI-generated images have gained in popularity in recent years due to improvements and developments in the field of artificial intelligence. This has led to several new AI generators, which may produce realistic, funny, and impressive images using a simple text prompt. DALL-E-2, Midjourney, and Craiyon are a few examples of the mentioned approaches. In general, it can be seen that the quality, realism, and appeal of the images vary depending on the used approach. Therefore, in this paper, we analyze to what extent such AI-generated images are realistic or of high appeal from a more photographic point of view and how users perceive them. To evaluate the appeal of several state-of-the-art AI generators, we develop a dataset consisting of 27 different text prompts, with some of them being based on the DrawBench prompts. Using these prompts we generated a total of 135 images with five different AI-Text-To-Image generators. These images in combination with real photos form the basis of our evaluation. The evaluation is based on an online subjective study and the results are compared with state-of-the-art image quality models and features. The results indicate that some of the included generators are able to produce realistic and highly appealing images. However, this depends on the approach and text prompt to a large extent. The dataset and evaluation of this paper are made publicly available for reproducibility, following an Open Science approach.
引用
收藏
页码:38999 / 39012
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Learning to Evaluate the Artness of AI-Generated Images
    Chen, Junyu
    An, Jie
    Lyu, Hanjia
    Kanan, Christopher
    Luo, Jiebo
    [J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2024, 26 : 10731 - 10740
  • [42] Astronomers explore uses for AI-generated images
    Castelvecchi, Davide
    [J]. NATURE, 2017, 542 (7639) : 16 - 17
  • [43] Auto articles: an experiment in AI-generated content
    Catherine Armitage
    Markus Kaindl
    [J]. Nature, 2020, 588 (7837) : S138 - S141
  • [44] Towards Detection of AI-Generated Texts and Misinformation
    Najee-Ullah, Ahmad
    Landeros, Luis
    Balytskyi, Yaroslav
    Chang, Sang-Yoon
    [J]. SOCIO-TECHNICAL ASPECTS IN SECURITY, STAST 2021, 2022, 13176 : 194 - 205
  • [45] AI-Generated Media for Exploring Alternate Realities
    Dunnell, Kevin
    Agarwal, Gauri
    Pataranutaporn, Pat
    Lippman, Andrew
    Maes, Pattie
    [J]. EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2024 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, CHI 2024, 2024,
  • [46] Validating AI-Generated Code with Live Programming
    Ferdowsi, Kasra
    Huang, Ruanqianqian
    James, Michael B.
    Polikarpova, Nadia
    Lerner, Sorin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYTEMS (CHI 2024), 2024,
  • [47] Presentation matters for AI-generated clinical advice
    Marzyeh Ghassemi
    [J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2023, 7 : 1833 - 1835
  • [48] AI-Generated Clinical Summaries-Reply
    Goodman, Katherine E.
    Morgan, Daniel J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 331 (22):
  • [49] Ethical Boundaries in AI-Generated Imagery: Analysis of Controversial Content Constraints
    Florindi, Emanuele
    Franzoni, Valentina
    Milani, Alfredo
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS-ICCSA 2024 WORKSHOPS, PT XI, 2024, 14825 : 292 - 302
  • [50] Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed
    Jakesch, Maurice
    Hancock, Jeffrey T.
    Naaman, Mor
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2023, 120 (11)