Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy plus best supportive care vs. best supportive care alone as first-line treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

被引:2
|
作者
Han, Jiaqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lan, Xiaomeng [4 ]
Tian, Kun [5 ]
Shen, Xi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
He, Jinlan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Nianyong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Head & Neck Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Lab Single Cell Res & Liquid Biopsy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp 4, West China Sch Publ Hlth, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Inst Urol, Dept Urol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
nasopharyngeal carcinoma; cost-effectiveness; capecitabine; maintenance therapy; real-world data; CELL LUNG-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; CISPLATIN; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; RECURRENT; PLACEBO; PATIENT; HEALTH; TRIAL;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.1086393
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectivesMaintenance therapy with capecitabine after induction chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) has been confirmed to be effective. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine as maintenance therapy for patients with mNPC from the Chinese payers' perspective. MethodsMarkov model was conducted to simulate the disease progress and evaluated the economic and health outcomes of capecitabine maintenance plus best-supported care (CBSC) or best-supported care (BSC) alone for patients with mNPC. Survival data were derived from the NCT02460419 clinical trial. Costs and utilities were obtained from the standard fee database and published literature. Measured outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years (LYs), incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), and incremental net-health benefit (INHB). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness. Additional subgroup cost-effectiveness analyses were accomplished. ResultsThroughout the course of the disease, the CBSC group provide an incremental cost of $9 734 and additional 1.16 QALYs (1.56 LYs) compared with the BSC group, resulting in an ICUR of $8 391/QALY and ICER of $6 240/LY. Moreover, the INHB was 0.89 QALYs, and the INMB was $32 034 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $36 007/QALY. Subgroup analyses revealed that CBSC presented a positive trend of gaining an INHB in all subgroups compared with the BSC group. The results of sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of our model. ConclusionCompared with BSC, after induction chemotherapy, CBSC as a first-line treatment was cost-effective for newly diagnosed mNPC. These results suggest capecitabine maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy as a new option for patients with newly diagnosed mNPC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus best supportive care in advanced renal cell carcinoma in Spain
    Maroto, P.
    Villavicencio, H.
    Pinol, C.
    Urruticoechea, L.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (06) : A280 - A280
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus best supportive care in advanced renal cell carcinoma.
    Gao, X.
    Reddy, P.
    Dhanda, R.
    Gondek, K.
    Yeh, Y. C.
    Stadler, W. M.
    Jonasch, E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 242S - 242S
  • [33] Maintenance therapy with vinflunine plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma with a response after first-line chemotherapy (MAJA; SOGUG 2011/02): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2 trial
    Garcia-Donas, Jesus
    Font, Albert
    Perez-Valderrama, Begona
    Antonio Virizuela, Jose
    Angel Climent, Miquel
    Hernando-Polo, Susana
    Angel Arranz, Jose
    del Mar Llorente, Maria
    Lainez, Nuria
    Carlos Villa-Guzman, Jose
    Mellado, Begona
    Gonzalez del Alba, Aranzazu
    Castellano, Daniel
    Gallardo, Enrique
    Anido, Urbano
    Garcia del Muro, Xavier
    Domenech, Montserrat
    Puente, Javier
    Morales-Barrera, Rafael
    Luis Perez-Gracia, Jose
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (05): : 672 - 681
  • [34] ERLOTINIB VS BEST SUPPORTIVE CARE AS THIRD-LINE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED NSCLC: A REAL-WORLD COST-EFFECTIVENESS STUDY
    Cromwell, Ian
    Van der Hoek, Kimberly
    Taylor, Suzanne
    Melosky, Barbara
    Peacock, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6 (06) : S1236 - S1237
  • [35] Best supportive care in combination with polychemotherapy versus best supportive care alone as second-line therapy in stage IV metastatic melanoma (DeCOG MM-PAL 8)
    Ulrich, J.
    Trefzer, U.
    Tilgen, W.
    Schadendorf, D.
    Kaatz, M.
    Mohr, P.
    Garbe, C.
    Hauschild, A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [36] Metronomic capecitabine vs. best supportive care in Child-Pugh B hepatocellular carcinoma: a proof of concept
    Stefania De Lorenzo
    Francesco Tovoli
    Maria Aurelia Barbera
    Francesca Garuti
    Andrea Palloni
    Giorgio Frega
    Ingrid Garajovà
    Alessandro Rizzo
    Franco Trevisani
    Giovanni Brandi
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [37] Economic evaluation of sunitinib versus pazopanib and best supportive care for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Chile: cost-effectiveness analysis and a mixed treatment comparison
    Vargas, C.
    Balmaceda, C.
    Rodriguez, F.
    Rojas, R.
    Giglio, A.
    Espinoza, M. A.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (05) : 609 - 617
  • [38] Metronomic capecitabine vs. best supportive care in Child-Pugh B hepatocellular carcinoma: a proof of concept
    De Lorenzo, Stefania
    Tovoli, Francesco
    Barbera, Maria Aurelia
    Garuti, Francesca
    Palloni, Andrea
    Frega, Giorgio
    Garajova, Ingrid
    Rizzo, Alessandro
    Trevisani, Franco
    Brandi, Giovanni
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [39] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF TREATMENT WITH ABOBOTULINUMTOXINA COMPARED TO BEST SUPPORTIVE CARE IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER LIMB SPASTICITY IN SWEDEN
    Forsmark, A.
    Danchenko, N.
    Ertzgaard, P.
    Lundkvist, J.
    Rosengren, L.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S338 - S339
  • [40] Avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC alone for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC): Association between clinical outcomes and exploratory biomarkers
    Powles, T. B.
    Loriot, Y.
    Bellmunt, J.
    Sternberg, C. N.
    Sridhar, S.
    Petrylak, D. P.
    Tambaro, R.
    Dourthe, L. M.
    Alvarez-Fernandez, C.
    Aarts, M.
    Mu, X. J.
    Ching, K. A.
    Pu, J.
    Roychoudhury, S.
    Davis, C. B.
    di Pietro, A.
    Grivas, P.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S552 - S553