Resilience principles and a leverage points perspective for sustainable woody vegetation management in a social-ecological system of southwestern Ethiopia

被引:5
|
作者
Shumi, Girma [1 ]
Wahler, Hannah [1 ,2 ]
Riechers, Maraja [1 ,3 ]
Senbeta, Feyera [4 ]
Abson, David J. [1 ]
Schultner, Jannik [5 ]
Fischer, Joern [1 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Social Ecol Syst Inst, Fac Sustainabil, Luneburg, Germany
[2] Lund Univ, Fac Social Sci, Dept Human Geog, Human Ecol Div, Lund, Sweden
[3] Thunen Inst Baltic Sea Fisheries, Fisheries & Soc Grp, Rostock, Germany
[4] Botswana Univ Agr & Nat Resources, Fac Sci, Dept Biol Sci, Gaborone, Botswana
[5] Wageningen Univ & Res, Environm Syst Anal Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2023年 / 28卷 / 02期
关键词
leverage points; resilience principles; smallholder farming landscapes; social-ecological systems; sustainability transformation; woody vegetation diversity management; FOOD SECURITY; BIODIVERSITY; KNOWLEDGE; CONSERVATION; TRANSFORMATION; LANDSCAPES; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS; RIGHTS;
D O I
10.5751/ES-14209-280234
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Addressing ecosystem destruction and unsustainable development requires appropriate frameworks to comprehensively investigate social-ecological systems. Focusing on woody plant management in southwestern Ethiopia, we combined social-ecological resilience and a leverage points perspective to (1) assess how stakeholders perceive and operationalize resilience principles; (2) investigate resilience challenges and solutions across different levels of systemic depth; and (3) assess how different stakeholder groups noted challenges and solutions at different levels of system depth. Data were collected in focus group discussions with multiple types of stakeholders and analyzed via quantitative content and descriptive analysis. All stakeholder groups identified two principles currently applied in the landscape, while other principles were not currently applied widely. In total, we identified 37 challenges and 44 solutions to resilience, mainly focused on "deeper" systemic change. This trend was noted across stakeholder groups, but particularly by local people. Based on our work, we suggest to foster bottom-up changes in system goals, rules, paradigms, and intent, drawing explicitly on local people and their knowledge. More broadly, we suggest that further research on combining social-ecological resilience and leverage points perspectives could be helpful to better navigate and transform social-ecological systems.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Advances in the study of Mexican fisheries with the social-ecological system (SES) perspective and its inclusion in fishery management policy
    del Carmen Pena-Puch, Angelina
    Carlos Perez-Jimenez, Juan
    Espinoza-Tenorio, Alejandro
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 185
  • [22] An adaptive cycle resilience perspective to understand the regime shifts of social-ecological system interactions over the past two millennia in the Tarim River Basin
    Wang, Shunke
    Xue, Jie
    Zhang, Zhiwei
    Sun, Huaiwei
    Li, Xinxin
    Chang, Jingjing
    Liu, Xin
    Yao, Luchen
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (14)
  • [23] Application of a tri-capital community resilience framework for assessing the social-ecological system sustainability of community-based forest management in the Philippines
    Jarzebski, Marcin Pawel
    Tumilba, Victor
    Yamamoto, Hirokazu
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2016, 11 (02) : 307 - 320
  • [24] Hydropower vs. fisheries conservation: a test of institutional design principles for common-pool resource management in the lower Mekong basin social-ecological system
    Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio
    Avagyan, Mikayel
    Firlus, Marit
    Helbing, Georg
    Kabakova, Margarita
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (01):