Identification of drainage patterns using a graph convolutional neural network

被引:6
|
作者
Liu, Chengyi [1 ]
Zhai, Renjian [1 ]
Qian, Haizhong [1 ]
Gong, Xianyong [1 ]
Wang, Andong [1 ]
Wu, Fang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Informat Engn Univ, Inst Geospatial Informat, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Informat Engn Univ, 62 Kexue St, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1111/tgis.13041
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Various geological factors shape drainage patterns. Identifying drainage patterns is a classic problem in topographical knowledge mining and map generalization. Existing rule-based methods rely heavily on the parameter settings of cartographers for drainage-pattern recognition. These methods effectively identify drainage patterns in specific areas but require manual parameter tuning to identify drainage patterns in other areas. Owing to the complexity of topological and geometric characteristics, drainage pattern recognition involves nonlinear problems, and it is difficult to build mapping relationships between characteristics and patterns using rule-based methods. Therefore, we proposed a data-driven method based on a graph convolutional neural network to avoid heavy reliance on human experience and automatically mine implicit relationships between characteristics and drainage patterns. First, six typical drainage patterns (dendritic, rectangular, parallel, trellis, reticulate, and fanned) were listed based on map specifications, and the unique characteristics of each drainage pattern were illustrated. Subsequently, the drainage graphs were constructed. The characteristics of the whole, local, and individual units in the drainage networks were quantified based on drainage vector data. Finally, an identification model was developed using graph convolution, self-attention pooling, and multiple fully connected layers for drainage pattern recognition. After training and testing, the accuracy of our model (0.801 +/- 0.014) was better than that of the rule-based method (0.572 +/- 0.000) and the traditional machine learning methods (less than 0.733 +/- 0.016). The results demonstrate that the ability of our model to identify drainage patterns surpasses that of other methods.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 776
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Retinal biometric identification using convolutional neural network
    Rodiah
    Madenda, Sarifuddin
    Susetianingtias, Diana Tri
    Fitrianingsih
    Adlina, Dea
    Arianty, Rini
    [J]. COMPUTER OPTICS, 2021, 45 (06) : 865 - 872
  • [22] Identification of Functional piRNAs Using a Convolutional Neural Network
    Ali, Syed Danish
    Alam, Waleed
    Tayara, Hilal
    Chong, Kil To
    [J]. IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 19 (03) : 1661 - 1669
  • [23] GCRINT: Network Traffic Imputation Using Graph Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network
    Van An Le
    Tien Thanh Le
    Phi Le Nguyen
    Huynh Thi Thanh Binh
    Akerkar, Rajendra
    Ji, Yusheng
    [J]. IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS (ICC 2021), 2021,
  • [24] Convolutional Neural Network Outperforms Graph Neural Network on the Spatially Variant Graph Data
    Boronina, Anna
    Maksimenko, Vladimir
    Hramov, Alexander E. E.
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (11)
  • [25] Damage identification based on convolutional neural network and recurrence graph for beam bridge
    He, Hao-xiang
    Zheng, Jia-cheng
    Liao, Li-can
    Chen, Yan-jiang
    [J]. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 20 (04): : 1392 - 1408
  • [26] Detecting Anomalous Network Communication Patterns Using Graph Convolutional Networks
    Vaisman, Yizhak
    Katz, Gilad
    Elovici, Yuval
    Shabtai, Asaf
    [J]. arXiv, 2023,
  • [27] A Foreground Extraction Approach Using Convolutional Neural Network with Graph Cut
    Utah, Matee
    Iltaf, Adnan
    Hou, Qiujun
    Ali, Farman
    Liu, Chuancai
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE, VISION AND COMPUTING (ICIVC), 2018, : 40 - 44
  • [28] Classification of urban interchange patterns using a model combining shape context descriptor and graph convolutional neural network
    Yang, Min
    Cao, Minjun
    Cheng, Lingya
    Jiang, Huiping
    Ai, Tinghua
    Yan, Xiongfeng
    [J]. GEO-SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2023, 27 (05) : 1622 - 1637
  • [29] A deep graph convolutional neural network architecture for graph classification
    Zhou, Yuchen
    Huo, Hongtao
    Hou, Zhiwen
    Bu, Fanliang
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (03):
  • [30] Graph Wavelet Convolutional Neural Network for Spatiotemporal Graph Modeling
    Jiang, Shan
    Ding, Zhi-Ming
    Zhu, Mei-Ling
    Yan, Jin
    Xu, Xin-Run
    [J]. Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software, 2021, 32 (03): : 726 - 741