Assessment of the Androstenedione Assay on a Roche Analytical Platform and Comparison with Different Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Ruth, Isabelle [1 ,3 ]
Le Goff, Caroline [2 ]
Peeters, Stephanie [2 ]
Bizumukama, Leonidas [1 ]
Deprez, Guillaume [1 ]
Duterme, Cecile [1 ]
Cotton, Frederic [1 ]
Wolff, Fleur [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles ULB, Lab Hosp Univ Bruxelles LHUB ULB, Dept Clin Chem, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Unilab Lg, Dept Clin Chem, Liege, Belgium
[3] Lab Hosp Univ Bruxelles LHUB ULB, Dept Clin Chem, Rue Haute 322, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
immunoassay; method comparison; androstenedione; mass spectrometry; radioimmunoassay;
D O I
10.7754/Clin.Lab.2022.220538
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: D4-androstenedione (D4ASD) is an intermediate hormone of androgen biosynthesis by the gonads and the adrenal glands. The interest in D4ASD concentration assessment resides in diagnostics of androgenic hy-perproduction pathologies. Currently, many D4ASD quantification methods are available on the market including immunological methods that remain problematic due to the possible cross-reactivity with endogenous or exoge-nous steroids.Methods: Recently Roche (R) launched a new fully automated instrument for the measurement of D4ASD concentra-tion. In this paper, the criteria of analytical performance (repeatability and intermediate precision) of the D4ASD Roche (R) assay were assessed and compared with 2 different methods including a radioimmunoassay (RIA) as well as a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method.Results: Repeatability and intermediate precision of the D4ASD Roche (R) were acceptable according to the prede-fined RICOS standard (CV <= 7.9%) and the assay showed a good correlation with other assays considering the 95% CI obtained for the slope and the y-intercept.Conclusions: This method demonstrates acceptable criteria of analytical performance with an intermediate impre-cision and a trueness within the fixed acceptance limits.(Clin. Lab. 2023;69:xx-xx. DOI: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2022.220538)
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 643
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In vivo total antioxidant capacity: Comparison of different analytical methods
    Prior, RL
    Cao, GH
    FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (11-12) : 1173 - 1181
  • [22] Analytical Ultracentrifugation of Model Nanoparticles: Comparison of Different Analysis Methods
    Mittal, Vikas
    Voelkel, Antje
    Coelfen, Helmut
    MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE, 2010, 10 (07) : 754 - 762
  • [23] Comparison of different analytical methods for quantification of lipids in ricotta cream
    Gusso, Ana Paula
    Mattanna, Paula
    de Pellegrini, Luiz Gustavo
    Cassanego, Daniela Buzatti
    Richards, Neila Silvia Pereira dos Santos
    Ribeiro, Alice de Souza
    JOURNAL OF CANDIDO TOSTES DAIRY INSTITUTE, 2012, 67 (389): : 51 - 55
  • [24] FK506 MEASUREMENT - COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ANALYTICAL METHODS
    WARTY, V
    ZUCKERMAN, S
    VENKATARAMANAN, R
    LEVER, J
    FUNG, J
    STARZL, T
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1993, 15 (03) : 204 - 208
  • [25] Analytical and clinical comparison of Elecsys syphilis (Roche®) - Architect syphilis TP and reformulated Architect syphilis TP (Abbott®) assay
    De Keukeleire, Steven
    Desmet, Stefanie
    Lagrou, Katrien
    Oosterlynck, Julie
    Verhulst, Manon
    Van Besien, Jessica
    Saegeman, Veroniek
    Reynders, Marijke
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2017, 87 (03) : 210 - 212
  • [26] Improved assay protocol for measurement of ammonia on the Roche Cobas 8000 automated platform
    Kaplon, J.
    de Groot, J. J.
    van Straalen, J. P.
    Heckman, M.
    Fischer, J. C.
    PRACTICAL LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2019, 13
  • [27] Comparison of analytical methods to assay inhibitors of angiotensin I-converting enzyme
    Chen, Jiwang
    Wang, Yimei
    Ye, Ran
    Wu, Yongning
    Xia, Wenshui
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2013, 141 (04) : 3329 - 3334
  • [28] Analytical validation of the Roche 25-OH Vitamin D Total assay
    Knudsen, Cindy Soendersoe
    Nexo, Ebba
    Hojskov, Carsten Schriver
    Heickendorff, Lene
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2012, 50 (11) : 1965 - 1968
  • [29] An inter-laboratory comparison of different analytical methods for the determination of monomethylmercury in various soil and sediment samples: A platform for method improvemen
    Kodamatani, Hitoshi
    Balogh, Steven J.
    Nollet, Yabing H.
    Matsuyama, Akito
    Fajon, Vesna
    Horvat, Milena
    Tomiyasu, Takashi
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2017, 169 : 32 - 39
  • [30] COMPARISON OF ANALYTICAL METHODS
    BEILBY, AL
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1972, 49 (10) : 679 - &