Early Relative Growth Rate of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Future Risk of Rupture or Repair

被引:2
|
作者
Kindon, Andrew J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mccombie, Andrew M. [4 ]
Frampton, Chris [4 ]
Khashram, Manar [5 ,6 ]
Clarke, Glynnis [7 ]
Roake, Justin [3 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Geohlth Lab, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Christchurch Publ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Canterbury Dist Hlth Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Christchurch Vasc Grp, Christchurch, New Zealand
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Surg, Dunedin, New Zealand
[5] Univ Auckland, Dept Surg, Auckland, New Zealand
[6] Waikato Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Hamilton, New Zealand
[7] Christchurch Publ Hosp, Dept Vasc Endovasc & Transplant Surg, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
Abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rate; Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk; Abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture; Abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance; Abdominal aortic aneurysm ultrasound surveillance cost effectiveness; SURVEILLANCE INTERVALS; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.08.006
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
<bold>Objective: </bold>This study aimed to test whether the relative growth rate of subthreshold abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in the first 24 months of surveillance predicts the risk of future rupture or repair.<bold>Methods: </bold>This was a single centre retrospective observational analysis of all small (< 45 mm diameter) and medium (45 - 54 mm in men, 45 - 50 mm in women) AAAs entered into ultrasound surveillance between January 2002 and December 2019, which received >= 24 months of surveillance. Relative growth rates were calculated from measurements taken in the first 24 months of surveillance. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate intervention and rupture free proportions five years following diagnosis for AAAs growing by < 5% and by >= 5% in the first 24 months of surveillance. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to further analyse this relationship by adjusting for factors found to be significantly associated with outcome in univariable analysis.<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 556 patients with AAAs (409 men, 147 women) were followed for >= 24 months. This included 431 small AAAs. Of these, 109 (25.3%) grew by < 5% in the first 24 months of surveillance and had a cumulative event free proportion of 0.98 +/- 0.05 at five years compared with 0.78 +/- 0.05 for the >= 5% growth group (p < .001). Of 125 medium AAAs, 26 (20.8%) grew by < 5% in the first 24 months of surveillance and had a cumulative event free proportion of 0.73 +/- 0.11 at five years compared with 0.29 +/- 0.13 for the >= 5% growth group (p = .024). Baseline diameter and early relative growth rate were strongly and independently predictive of future intervention or rupture with hazard ratios of 9.16 (95% CI 5.98 - 14.03, p < .001) and 4.46 (95% CI 2.45 - 8.14, p < .001), respectively.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The results suggest that slow expansion of small (< 45 mm) AAAs observed over an isolated 24 month period is indicative of a very low risk of rupture or repair in the medium term. Isolated growth rates may be a useful tool with which to triage low risk AAAs and prevent unnecessary surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 803
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Growth rates and risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms (vol 85, pg 1674, 1998)
    Vardulaki, KA
    Prevost, TC
    Walker, NM
    Day, NE
    Wilmink, ABM
    Quick, CRG
    Ashton, HA
    Scott, RAP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (02) : 280 - 280
  • [22] Reconsidering the Rupture Risk Potential of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in High Risk Patients
    Paraskevas, Kosmas I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 55 (02) : 290 - 290
  • [23] Rupture of Abdominal Aortic and Iliac Aneurysms in Patients With and Without Antecedent Endovascular Repair
    Hans, Sachinder Singh
    Catanescu, Irina
    Bove, Paul
    Long, Graham
    Khoury, Michael
    Uzieblo, Maciej
    Rimar, Steven
    Brown, William
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 62 (03) : 830 - 830
  • [24] Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms - Risk stratified outcomes
    Chaikof, EL
    Lin, PH
    Brinkman, WT
    Dodson, TF
    Weiss, VJ
    Lumsden, AB
    Terramani, TT
    Najibi, S
    Bush, RL
    Salam, AA
    Smith, RB
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 235 (06) : 833 - 839
  • [25] Rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The role of computational mechanics
    Giannoglou, Georgios
    Giannakoulas, Georgios
    Hatzitolios, Apostolos I.
    Rudolf, Jobst
    HERZ, 2008, 33 (05) : 354 - 361
  • [26] A Review of Computational Methods to Predict the Risk of Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Canchi, Tejas
    Kumar, S. D.
    Ng, E. Y. K.
    Narayanan, Sriram
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [27] Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Current status and future directions
    Kaufman, JA
    Geller, SC
    Brewster, DC
    Fan, CM
    Cambria, RP
    LaMuraglia, GM
    Gertler, JP
    Abbott, WM
    Waltman, AC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (02) : 289 - 302
  • [28] In-Hospital Efficacy of Endovascular Aortic Repair in Patients With Impending Rupture versus Contained Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Xiong, Jiang
    Guo, Wei
    Liu, Xiaoping
    Wang, Lijun
    Jia, Xin
    Ma, Xiaohui
    Zhang, Hongpeng
    Zhang, Tao
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 27 (08) : 1054 - 1060
  • [29] Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms based on a novel probabilistic rupture risk index
    Polzer, Stanislav
    Gasser, T. Christian
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2015, 12 (113)
  • [30] Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: The excessive mortality rate of conventional repair
    Noel, AA
    Gloviczki, P
    Cherry, KJ
    Bower, TC
    Panneton, JM
    Mozes, GI
    Harmsen, WS
    Jenkins, GD
    Hallett, JW
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 34 (01) : 41 - 45