Two different regimens of outpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in nulliparas: A randomized trial

被引:1
|
作者
Hong, Jesrine [1 ]
Raghavan, Sreella [1 ]
Nordiana, Ayub Siti [1 ]
Saaid, Rahmah [1 ]
Vallikkannu, Narayanan [1 ]
Tan, Peng Chiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jalan Prof Diraja Ungku Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
amniotomy; cesarean; expectant management; Foley catheter; maternal satisfaction; nulliparous; outpatient labor induction; CESAREAN DELIVERY; UNFAVORABLE CERVIX; RISK; WOMEN; AMNIOTOMY;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.15199
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate expectant compared to immediate return to hospital upon outpatient Foley catheter expulsion predicated on maternal satisfaction and amniotomy-titrated oxytocin infusion to delivery interval.Methods: This randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary university hospital in Malaysia from September 2020 to February 2022. A total of 330 nulliparous women at term with unripe cervices (Bishop score <= 5), singleton viable fetus in cephalic presentation, reassuring preinduction fetal heart rate tracing and intact membranes who underwent planned outpatient Foley catheter induction of labor (IOL) were included. Women were randomized to expectant or immediate return to hospital if the Foley was spontaneously expelled at home before their scheduled hospital admission the following day. Primary outcomes were amniotomy-titrated oxytocin infusion to delivery interval and maternal satisfaction on the induction process (assessed by 0-10 visual numerical rating scale [VNRS]).Results: Amniotomy-titrated oxytocin infusion to delivery interval was 8.7 +/- 4.1 versus 8.9 +/- 3.9 h, P = 0.605 (mean difference - 0.228 95% CI: -1.1 to +0.6 h) and maternal satisfaction VNRS score was median (interquartile range) 8 (7-9) versus 8 (7-9), P = 0.782. Early return to hospital rates were 37/165 (22.4%) versus 72/165 (43.6%), RR 0.51 (95% CI: 0.37-0.72), P <= 0.001, Cesarean delivery rates were 80/165 (48.5%) versus 80/165 (48.5%), RR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.80-1.25), P = 1.00 and duration of hospital stay was 54.4 +/- 22.9 versus 56.7 +/- 22.8 h, P = 0.364 for the expectant versus immediate return groups respectively.Conclusion: In outpatient Foley catheter IOL, expectant compared to immediate return to hospital following Foley dislodgement results in similarly high maternal satisfaction. The amniotomy-titrated oxytocin to delivery duration is non-inferior with expectant management.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 274
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Foley catheter placement for induction of labor with or without stylette: a randomized clinical trial
    Forgie, Marie M.
    Greer, Danielle M.
    Kram, Jessica J. F.
    Vander Wyst, Kiley B.
    Salvo, Nicole P.
    Siddiqui, Danish S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (03)
  • [22] Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Obese Nulliparous Patients: A Secondary Analysis of OFFSITE II Randomized Controlled Trial
    Seasely, Angela R.
    Xue, Yumo
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth B.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Blanchard, Christina T.
    Files, Pamela
    Kuper, Spencer C.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Tita, Alan T.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2023, 78 (12) : 722 - 724
  • [23] A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction
    Chung, JH
    Huang, WH
    Rumney, PJ
    Garite, TJ
    Nageotte, MP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) : 1031 - 1035
  • [24] Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Obese Nulliparous Patients: A Secondary Analysis of OFFSITE II Randomized Controlled Trial
    Seasely, Angela R. R.
    Xue, Yumo
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth B. B.
    Jauk, Victoria C. C.
    Blanchard, Christina T. T.
    Files, Pamela
    Kuper, Spencer C. C.
    Casey, Brian M. M.
    Szychowski, Jeff M. M.
    Harper, Lorie M. M.
    Tita, Alan T. T.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 40 (08) : 807 - 810
  • [25] Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gu, Ning
    Ru, Tong
    Wang, Zhiqun
    Dai, Yimin
    Zheng, Mingming
    Xu, Biyun
    Hu, Yali
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [26] Transcervical foley catheter or vaginal misoprostol for induction of term pregnancy labor: a randomized trial
    Rosado-Tovar, Maria
    Reyna-Villasmil, Eduardo
    Santos-Bolivar, Joel
    Mejia-Montilla, Jorly
    Reyna-Villasmil, Nadia
    Fernandez-Ramirez, Andreina
    AVANCES EN BIOMEDICINA, 2016, 5 (03): : 129 - 137
  • [27] Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labor: a randomized trial
    Wise, Michelle R.
    Thompson, John M. D.
    Battin, Malcolm
    McDougall, Jenny
    Wilson, Jessica
    Marriott, Joy
    Stitely, Michael
    Sadler, Lynn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (06)
  • [28] Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraarmniotic saline infusion for labor induction - A Randomized controlled trial
    Lin, Monique G.
    Reid, Kimberlyj
    Treaster, Matthew R.
    Nuthalapaty, Francis S.
    Ramsey, Patrick S.
    Lu, George C.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 110 (03): : 558 - 565
  • [29] Induction of Labor in Preeclamptic Women in India: A Randomized Trial Comparing Foley Catheter With Oral Misoprostol
    Mundle, Shuchita
    Bracken, Hillary
    Faragher, Brian
    Easterling, Thomas
    Winikoff, Beverly
    Weeks, Andrew
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 : 75S - 75S
  • [30] Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: A randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety
    Lanka, Sreelakshmi
    Surapaneni, Tarakeswari
    Nirmalan, Praveen K.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 40 (06) : 1527 - 1533