Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses: Safety and Efficacy of Complementary and Alternative Treatments for Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

被引:0
|
作者
Zulauf-McCurdy, Courtney A. [1 ]
LaCount, Patrick A. [1 ]
Shelton, Christopher R. [2 ]
Morrow, Anne S. [3 ]
Zhao, Xin A. [4 ]
Russell, Douglas [1 ]
Sibley, Margaret H. [1 ,6 ]
Arnold, L. Eugene [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Behrend Coll, State Coll, PA USA
[3] South Florida Integrat Med, Coral Gables, FL USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Med, Irvine, CA USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Nisonger Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Hlth, Columbus, OH USA
[6] Seattle Childrens Res Inst, Ctr Child Hlth Behav & Dev, M-S Cure 3,POB 5371, Seattle, WA 98145 USA
来源
关键词
complementary and alternative treatments; ADHD; meta-analyses; safety; integrative health; DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; DOUBLE-BLIND; ZINC SUPPLEMENTATION; CHILDREN; INTERVENTIONS; ADHD; ADOLESCENTS; SYMPTOMS; MEDICINE; FOOD;
D O I
10.1097/DBP.0000000000001184
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective:Complementary and alternative treatments (CATs) for ADHD have proliferated over the past decade; however, their safety and efficacy remain uncertain. We completed a systematic review and meta-analyses across CAT domains.Methods:Systematic search and data extraction identified randomized controlled trials for pediatric ADHD (ages 3-19 years) that included probably blind ADHD symptom outcome measures. We evaluated basic (RCT of a CAT compared with sham/placebo, attention/active control, treatment as usual, and waitlist control), complementary (RCTs comparing an evidence-based treatment with a CAT and the same evidence-based treatment), and alternative (evidence-based treatment to CAT) efficacy. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted when at least 3 blinded studies were identified for a specific CAT domain.Results:Eighty-seven of 2253 nonduplicate screened manuscripts met inclusion criteria. No study reported significantly greater adverse effects for CATs than controls; naturopathy reported fewer adverse effects than evidence-based treatments but did not demonstrate basic efficacy. In the systematic review of basic efficacy, evidence of effectiveness was mixed but replicated previous evidence for the possible efficacy of cognitive training, neurofeedback, and essential fatty acid supplementation for certain patients. With respect to alternative and complementary efficacy, no CAT outperformed or enhanced evidence-based treatments (stimulant medications and behavioral therapy) when replication was required. Individual meta-analyses indicated that cognitive training was the only CAT that demonstrated overall basic efficacy (SMD = 0.216; p = 0.032).Conclusion:Clinicians may cautiously recommend (but monitor) cognitive training when evidence-based treatments are not feasible or effective for a patient. Additional studies are needed to further understand the potential of CAT domains.
引用
收藏
页码:e322 / e332
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prevalence of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Thomas, Rae
    Sanders, Sharon
    Doust, Jenny
    Beller, Elaine
    Glasziou, Paul
    PEDIATRICS, 2015, 135 (04) : E994 - E1001
  • [32] Childhood Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Future Substance Use Disorders: Comparative Meta-Analyses
    Charach, Alice
    Yeung, Emanuela
    Climans, Troy
    Lillie, Erin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 50 (01): : 9 - 21
  • [33] Efficacy and Safety of Medication for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents with Common Comorbidities: A Systematic Review
    Tsujii, Noa
    Usami, Masahide
    Naya, Noriyuki
    Tsuji, Toshinaga
    Mishima, Hirokazu
    Horie, Junko
    Fujiwara, Masakazu
    Iida, Junzo
    NEUROLOGY AND THERAPY, 2021, 10 (02) : 499 - 522
  • [34] Efficacy and Safety of Medication for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents with Common Comorbidities: A Systematic Review
    Noa Tsujii
    Masahide Usami
    Noriyuki Naya
    Toshinaga Tsuji
    Hirokazu Mishima
    Junko Horie
    Masakazu Fujiwara
    Junzo Iida
    Neurology and Therapy, 2021, 10 : 499 - 522
  • [35] Psychosocial treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Knight L.A.
    Rooney M.
    Chronis-Tuscano A.
    Current Psychiatry Reports, 2008, 10 (5) : 412 - 418
  • [36] A meta-analysis of behavioral treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Fabiano, Gregory A.
    Pelham, William E., Jr.
    Coles, Erika K.
    Gnagy, Elizabeth M.
    Chronis-Tuscano, Andrea
    O'Connor, Briannon C.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2009, 29 (02) : 129 - 140
  • [37] Cardiovascular Safety of Medication Treatments for 198 Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    Newcorn, Jeffrey H.
    Donnelly, Craig
    MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 76 (02): : 198 - 203
  • [38] Research Review: Diffusion tensor imaging studies of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: meta-analyses and reflections on head motion
    Aoki, Yuta
    Cortese, Samuele
    Castellanos, Francisco Xavier
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 59 (03) : 193 - 202
  • [39] A systematic review on the intersection of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and gaming disorder
    Dullur, Pravin
    Krishnan, Vijay
    Diaz, Antonio Mendoza
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2021, 133 : 212 - 222
  • [40] Complementary and Alternative Medical Therapies for Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
    Pellow, Janice
    Solomon, Elizabeth M.
    Barnard, Candice N.
    ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE REVIEW, 2011, 16 (04) : 323 - 337