Comparison of pharmacy student survey results: Student perceptions of face-to-face and online lectures during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:0
|
作者
Iwasawa, Makiko [1 ,2 ]
Otori, Katsuya [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Div Clin Pharm Drug Informat, Sch Pharm, Sagamihara, Japan
[2] Kitasato Univ, Sch Pharm, Res & Educ Ctr Clin Pharm, Sagamihara, Japan
[3] Kitasato Univ, Sch Pharm, Div Clin Pharm Pharm Practice & Sci 1, Sagamihara, Japan
[4] Kitasato Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, Sagamihara, Japan
来源
PHARMACY EDUCATION | 2023年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
COVID-19; Education; Face-to-face; Online; Pharmacy; Student perception;
D O I
10.46542/pe.2023.231.321328
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of student surveys obtained in 2021 and 2022 to assess the changes in student satisfaction levels and perceptions of face-to-face versus online lectures during the pandemic. Methods: A survey was conducted at Kitasato University in Japan using a questionnaire to help assess the most preferred lecture style for students and their level of satisfaction with online lectures. Results: In 2021, 81.7% of participants responded that they preferred online lectures. Although most courses returned to a traditional classroom setting in 2022, only 10% of students reported preferring face-to-face lectures, with an increasing number of somewhat dissatisfied participants. However, many students were satisfied with on-demand video lectures for review and hoped that these would continue to be available after the pandemic. Conclusion: Student expectations of online classes seem to have been met. Students preferred more flexibility and choice in lecture style. In the future, consistent scheduling and lecture styles will be essential factors in student satisfaction and engagement with their studies.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 328
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Student physiotherapists perceptions of online curriculum delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Chesterton, Paul
    Richardson, Mark
    Tears, Craig
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [22] Online and face-to-face guest lectures: graduate students' perceptions
    Alebaikan, Reem A.
    LEARNING AND TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION-GULF PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 13 (02): : 53 - 65
  • [23] Navigating the New Normal: Student Perspectives on Transitioning from Online to Face-to-Face Learning after COVID-19 Lockdowns
    Jayawardena, Amal
    Kahandawa, Gayan
    Hewawasam, Hasitha
    Piyathilaka, Lasitha
    Sul, Jay
    VIII IEEE WORLD ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE, EDUNINE 2024, 2024,
  • [24] Resilience and psychological factors among dentistry students who received face-to-face lectures during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Rodriguez-Molinero, Jesus
    Corral-Liria, Inmaculada
    Jimenez-Fernandez, Raquel
    Ramirez-Puerta, Rosario
    Gonzalez-Martin, Sara
    Delgado-Somolinos, Esther
    Losa-Iglesias, Marta Elena
    Lopez-Sanchez, Antonio Francisco
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [25] Comparing instructor and student perspectives of online versus face-to-face education for program factors during the pandemic
    Fish, Lynn A.
    Snodgrass, Coral R.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2023, 98 (08) : 452 - 461
  • [26] Moving from face-to-face to online learning in a week due to the COVID-19 pandemic: higher education students' perceptions
    Xinogalos, Stelios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2022, 14 (04) : 363 - 381
  • [27] An Assessment of Student Learning Perceptions in Concurrent Online and Face-to-Face Education Delivery Environments
    Raghavan, Vijay V.
    Braun, Frank
    Goh, Samuel
    AMCIS 2014 PROCEEDINGS, 2014,
  • [28] Shifting identities: an examination of student perceptions and experiences in face-to-face and online learning in Nepal
    Jeevan Khanal
    Education and Information Technologies, 2024, 29 : 4287 - 4315
  • [30] Applying the scholarship of teaching and learning: student perceptions, behaviours and success online and face-to-face
    Horspool, Agi
    Lange, Carsten
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 37 (01) : 73 - 88