Prioritization of land consolidation projects using the multi-criteria Best-Worst Method: a case study from Poland

被引:4
|
作者
Ertunc, Ela [1 ]
Janus, Jaroslaw [2 ]
Uyan, Mevlut [3 ]
机构
[1] Konya Tech Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, Dept Geomat Engn, Konya, Turkiye
[2] Agr Univ Krakow, Fac Environm Engn & Land Surveying, Dept Agr Land Surveying Cadastre & Photogrammetry, Krakow, Poland
[3] Konya Tech Univ, Vocat Sch Tech Sci, Konya, Turkiye
关键词
Agriculture; Decision-making method; Land management; Priority; Project ranking; DECISION-MAKING; SUPPLIER SELECTION; PRODUCTIVITY; AREAS; FRAGMENTATION; PERFORMANCE; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-023-11712-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In order to balance the needs of ecology, environment, and agricultural productivity with the aim of revitalizing rural areas, every local government unit that plans to implement a land consolidation (LC) project should decide where to start these projects as a priority. Traditionally, some of these decisions are made by groups of people connected to the consolidated area, while the others are made by groups of people from government departments, all trying to make the best possible decision. However, one of the most important conditions for the successful implementation of these projects, requiring large investment costs is, determining the priority areas for LC projects and allocating the investments to the appropriate areas meticulously. This study proposed a new model for determining priority areas for LC projects. In this study, by determining a set of criteria according to the parameters taken from 75 villages (Malopolska region, Poland), a model was developed for prioritizing LC projects using the Best-Worst Method (BWM), a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. The proposed model enables the transparent identification and prioritization of villages for land consolidation by national and local authorities, effective management of resources, and equitable allocation of financial assistance.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prioritization of land consolidation projects using the multi-criteria Best-Worst Method: a case study from Poland
    Ela Ertunç
    Jarosław Janus
    Mevlut Uyan
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195
  • [2] A multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria decision making
    Brunelli, Matteo
    Rezaei, Jafar
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 47 (01) : 12 - 15
  • [3] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [4] On solving the Best-Worst Method in multi-criteria decision-making
    Beemsterboer, D. J. C.
    Hendrix, E. M. T.
    Claassen, G. D. H.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (11): : 1660 - 1665
  • [5] Evaluation of Projects Risks for Dairy Industry Using Best-Worst Multi-criteria Decision-Making
    Darestani, Soroush Avakh
    Tadi, Azam Moradi
    Mirzaei, Samaneh
    2020 IEEE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA 2020), 2020, : 1110 - 1115
  • [6] A Fuzzy Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Method
    Guo, Sen
    Qi, Ze
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 118941 - 118952
  • [7] A group multi-criteria decision-making based on best-worst method
    Safarzadeh, Soroush
    Khansefid, Saba
    Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 126 : 111 - 121
  • [8] Robust Optimization of Best-worst Multi-criteria Decision-making Method
    Qu, Deqiang
    Wu, Zhong
    Qu, Shaojian
    Zhang, Fan
    Li, Ping
    JOURNAL OF WEB ENGINEERING, 2020, 19 (7-8): : 1067 - 1088
  • [9] Land valuation with Best Worst Method in land consolidation projects
    Ertunc, Ela
    Uyan, Mevlut
    LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 122
  • [10] A novel modified fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Mohtashami, Ali
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 181