A Fuzzy Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Method

被引:23
|
作者
Guo, Sen [1 ,2 ]
Qi, Ze [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Changping, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Linguistics; Decision making; Power systems; Licenses; Economics; Uncertainty; Sorting; Fuzzy best-worst method; group decision-making; linguistic assessment information; multi-granular fuzzy linguistic context; multi-criteria decision-making; SUPPLIER; BWM;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3106296
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper proposed a novel fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria group decision-making method to solve the group decision-making (GDM) problem with multi-granular linguistic approach, which is an effective and promising technique to tackle this issue. In the proposed method, the selectable multi-granularity linguistic term sets (LTS) are firstly provided for experts to expressed their individual assessment information. Then, the improved fuzzy BWM is employed to calculate the weights of criteria with the form of fuzzy numbers. In current several studies using the BWM for group decision-making, only two unified best and worst criteria are given, which cannot reflect the evaluation of the best and worst criteria by different experts, resulting in the omission of information. Moreover, the difference between the best and worst criteria initially given and the experts' ideas will cause the experts to be inaccurate in the comparison of each criterion. Therefore, in this paper, in order not to omit too much information, each expert will determine the best and the worst criteria. The evaluation information of each expert is integrated into two comparison vectors according to the transformation formula proposed in this paper. What's more, an improved input-based consistency measurement is proposed, which can provide the DMs with a clear guideline on the revision of the inconsistent judgement(s). Finally, two examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:118941 / 118952
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A group multi-criteria decision-making based on best-worst method
    Safarzadeh, Soroush
    Khansefid, Saba
    Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 126 : 111 - 121
  • [2] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [3] A novel modified fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Mohtashami, Ali
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 181
  • [4] Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications
    Guo, Sen
    Zhao, Haoran
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2017, 121 : 23 - 31
  • [5] On solving the Best-Worst Method in multi-criteria decision-making
    Beemsterboer, D. J. C.
    Hendrix, E. M. T.
    Claassen, G. D. H.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (11): : 1660 - 1665
  • [6] An intuitionistic fuzzy multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria group decision making
    Mou, Qiong
    Xu, Zeshui
    Liao, Huchang
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 374 : 224 - 239
  • [7] Hesitant fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications
    Ali, Asif
    Rashid, Tabasam
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (08) : 1953 - 1967
  • [8] Fuzzy best-worst method based on triangular fuzzy numbers for multi-criteria decision-making
    Dong, Jiuying
    Wan, Shuping
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 547 : 1080 - 1104
  • [9] An α-cut intervals based Fuzzy Best-Worst Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Ratandhara, Harshit M.
    Kumar, Mohit
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2024, 159
  • [10] A Consensus-Based Best-Worst Method for Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making
    Labella, Alvaro
    Garcia-Zamora, Diego
    Rodriguez, Rosa M.
    Martinez, Luis
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2022, 2023, : 48 - 58