Diversity in online resources for breast reconstruction: What do patients see?

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Erica [1 ]
Yesantharao, Pooja [1 ]
Long, Chao [1 ]
He, Waverley [1 ]
Landford, Wilmina [1 ]
Xun, Helen [1 ]
Sacks, Justin M. [2 ]
Cooney, Carisa M. [1 ]
Broderick, Kristen P. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Sch Med, 4940 Eastern Ave,Suite A520, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY | 2024年 / 89卷
关键词
Diversity; Breast reconstruction; Patient outcomes; Shared decision making; making; Online resources; Patient education resources; HEALTH INFORMATION; DECISION-MAKING; WOMEN; BIAS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; SATISFACTION; ATTITUDES; INTERNET; IMPLICIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2023.09.028
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Online resources are commonly used by patients to obtain informa- tion on breast reconstruction. Despite the key role of these resources in patient decisionmaking, their visual content has not yet been evaluated. This study sought to 1) characterize the presence and content of visual aids in online patient education breast reconstruction re- sources and 2) determine if the women represented in these visual aids reflect the breast reconstruction patient population in the United States. Methods: The top 10 Google websites and the first 400 Google Images containing photographs/ graphics depicting human skin for the search phrase "breast reconstruction" were analyzed. Images were categorized by content as "Before/After," "Surgical/Anatomical," "Step -byStep," or "Breast -Centric Stock Images." Image subjects were classified by skin tone into "White" or "Non -White" using the Fitzpatrick scale and by body type into "Lean" or "FullFigured." Results: In total, 471 images were analyzed. These were predominantly "Before/After" images (43.9%), followed by "Breast -Centric Stock Images" (27.4%), "Surgical/Anatomical" (24.2%), and "Step -by -Step" (4.5%). The majority of all images depicted "White" skin types (90.7%) and "Lean" body types (73.0%). "Before/After" images were more likely to show "Full -Figured" women than the other content categories (p < 0.0001) and had the highest percentage of "Non -White" skin types (35.3%). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that breast reconstruction online resources are not reflective of the patient population seeking reconstruction. Improving the diversity of online image resources can both better represent our diverse patient population as well as better align patient expectations with postoperative outcomes, likely improving patient satisfaction. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 163
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What do you see
    张元彪
    中国民族博览, 2016, (09) : 10 - 10
  • [22] WHAT DO ANIMALS SEE
    MILNE, LJ
    MILNE, M
    AMERICAN SCHOLAR, 1959, 28 (01): : 39 - 48
  • [23] What Do You See?
    刘颖颖
    疯狂英语(双语世界), 2020, (02) : 4 - 6
  • [24] What do you see?
    Wen, K. A.
    Pais, I.
    Klein, J.
    Lehnert, H.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2009, 134 (07) : 307 - 308
  • [25] What to do? Click and see
    Beckman, D
    Hirsch, D
    ABA JOURNAL, 2005, 91 : 57 - 57
  • [26] What do I see
    van der Geest, Patrick
    Dolmans, Rianne G. F.
    Eikemans, Bob
    INTENSIVIST, 2024, 32 (02):
  • [27] What do you see?
    Austein, Thorsten
    Demme, Bettina
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2010, 135 (44) : 2187 - 2188
  • [28] AN EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY OF ONLINE RESOURCES FOR BREAST CANCER PATIENTS
    Brar, B.
    Lin, J.
    Ingledew, P.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 60 (01) : 232 - 233
  • [29] We will do what we see what we do not see (Miles gloriosus 149)
    Dumont, Jean Christian
    CAHIERS DES ETUDES ANCIENNES, 2014, (51): : 75 - 86
  • [30] What we see and what we do not see in heath care
    Skaricic, Natasa
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 52 (02) : 215 - 217