BRCA1/2 testing rates in epithelial ovarian cancer: a focus on the untested patients

被引:2
|
作者
Lanjouw, Lieke [1 ]
Mourits, Marian J. E. [2 ]
Bart, Joost [3 ]
ter Elst, Arja [3 ]
Berger, Lieke P., V [4 ]
van der Hout, Annemieke H. [4 ]
Alam, Naufil [5 ]
de Bock, Geertruida H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pathol & Med Biol, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Genet, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] AstraZeneca Pharmaceut LP, Cambridge, England
关键词
ovarian cancer; BRCA1; protein; BRCA2; WOMEN; MUTATIONS;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2023-004307
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Since 2015, Dutch guidelines have recommended BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant testing for all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Recently, recommendations shifted from germline testing to the tumor-first approach, in which tumor tissue is tested first, and subsequent germline testing is performed only in those with BRCA1/2 tumor pathogenic variants or a positive family history. Data on testing rates and on characteristics of patients missing out on testing remain scarce. Objective To evaluate BRCA1/2 testing rates in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and compare testing rates of germline testing (performed from 2015 until mid-2018) versus tumor-first testing (implemented mid-2018). Methods A consecutive series of 250 patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer between 2016 and 2019 was included from the OncoLifeS data-biobank of the University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands. Testing rates were analyzed for the overall study population and for germline testing (period I) and tumor-first testing (period II) separately. Characteristics of tested and untested patients were compared and predictors for receiving testing were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. Results Median age was 67.0 years (IQR 59.0-73.0) and 173 (69.2%) patients were diagnosed with high-grade serous carcinoma. Overall, 201 (80.4%) patients were tested. In period I, 137/171 (80.1%) patients were tested and in period II this was 64/79 (81.0%). Patients with non-high-grade serous carcinoma were significantly less likely to receive BRCA1/2 testing than patients with high-grade serous carcinoma (OR=0.23, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.46, p<0.001). Conclusions The results show that BRCA1/2 testing rates are suboptimal and suggest that clinicians may not be choosing to test patients with epithelial ovarian cancer with non-high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, although guidelines recommend BRCA1/2 testing in all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Suboptimal testing rates limit optimization of care for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and counseling of potentially affected relatives.
引用
收藏
页码:1260 / 1269
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Timing of BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing in women with ovarian cancer
    Daniels, Molly S.
    Urbauer, Diana L.
    Stanley, Jennifer L.
    Johnson, Kristin G.
    Lu, Karen H.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 11 (09) : 624 - 628
  • [12] BRCA1/2 in non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer: tumour with or without germline testing?
    Robert D. Morgan
    George J. Burghel
    Nicola Flaum
    Michael Bulman
    Philip Smith
    Andrew R. Clamp
    Jurjees Hasan
    Claire L. Mitchell
    Zena Salih
    Emma R. Woodward
    Fiona Lalloo
    Emma J. Crosbie
    Richard J. Edmondson
    Andrew J. Wallace
    Gordon C. Jayson
    D. Gareth R. Evans
    British Journal of Cancer, 2022, 127 : 163 - 167
  • [13] Practice guidelines for BRCA1/2 tumour testing in ovarian cancer
    Grafodatskaya, Daria
    O'Rielly, Darren D.
    Bedard, Karine
    Butcher, Darci T.
    Howlett, Christopher J.
    Lytwyn, Alice
    McCready, Elizabeth
    Parboosingh, Jillian
    Spriggs, Elizabeth L.
    Vaags, Andrea K.
    Stockley, Tracy L.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2022, 59 (08) : 727 - 736
  • [14] UPTAKE OF BREAST CANCER SCREENING STRATEGIES IN EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTS WITH BRCA1/2 MUTATION
    Kim, S.
    Kim, M. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 : A76 - A76
  • [15] Prognostic value of BRCA1 promoter methylation for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer
    Azais, Henri
    Garinet, Simon
    Benoit, Louise
    de Jesus, Julie
    Zizi, Mohamed
    Landman, Samuel
    Bats, Anne-Sophie
    Taly, Valerie
    Laurent-Puig, Pierre
    Blons, Helene
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 53 (07)
  • [17] Trends in and determinants of germline BRCA1/2 testing in patients with breast and ovarian cancer.
    Lau-Min, Kelsey S.
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Nathanson, Katherine L.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)
  • [18] BRCA1 mutation testing for Japanese patients with ovarian cancer in breast cancer screening
    Yoichiro Yamashita
    Tadashi Sagawa
    Toshio Fujimoto
    Teruo Sugawara
    Hideto Yamada
    Nobuhiko Hoshi
    Noriaki Sakuragi
    Chikashi Ishioka
    Seiichiro Fujimoto
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1999, 58 : 11 - 17
  • [19] BRCA1 mutation testing for Japanese patients with ovarian cancer in breast cancer screening
    Yamashita, Y
    Sagawa, T
    Fujimoto, T
    Sugawara, T
    Yamada, H
    Hoshi, N
    Sakuragi, N
    Ishioka, C
    Fujimoto, S
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1999, 58 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [20] Brain metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer by BRCA1/2 mutation status
    Stasenko, Marina
    Cybulska, Paulina
    Feit, Noah
    Makker, Vicky
    Konner, Jason
    O'Cearbhaill, Roisin E.
    Alektiar, Kaled M.
    Beal, Kathryn
    Gardner, Ginger J.
    Roche, Kara C. Long
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Zivanovic, Oliver
    Leitao, Mario M., Jr.
    Cadoo, Karen A.
    Tew, William P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 (01) : 144 - 149