The PTSD Criterion A debate: A brief history, current status, and recommendations for moving forward

被引:17
|
作者
Marx, Brian P. [1 ,2 ]
Hall-Clark, Brittany [3 ,4 ]
Friedman, Matthew J. [4 ,5 ]
Holtzheimer, Paul [4 ,5 ]
Schnurr, Paula P. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, Natl Ctr PTSD, Boston, MA 02130 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Dept Psychiat, Chobanian & Avedisian Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] Natl Ctr PTSD, Execut Div, White River Jct, VT 05009 USA
[5] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Psychiat, Hanover, NH USA
关键词
POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; TRAUMATIC EVENTS; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/jts.23007
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Criterion A, also known as the "stressor criterion," has been a major source of debate ever since PTSD was added to the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM) in 1980. Since then, the traumatic stress field has held an ongoing debate about how to best define Criterion A and the events that it covers. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic and recent race-based incidents, the Criterion A debate has been reinvigorated. In this paper, we review briefly the history of Criterion A and changes in its language across different editions of the DSM. We then describe the four main positions held by scholars involved in the Criterion A debate and carefully examine the support for those positions. We conclude by offering recommendations for moving forward.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 15
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [31] QuADRANT - a Study on Clinical Audit Uptake and Implementation Across Europe - Current Status and Recommendations on how to move forward
    Jornet, N.
    Coffey, M.
    Bradly, A.
    Clark, J.
    Giammarile, F.
    Wadsak, W.
    Hierath, M.
    Strojan, P.
    Howlett, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S142 - S143
  • [32] Recommendations for snag retention in southwestern mixed-conifer and ponderosa pine forests: History and current status
    Ganey, Joseph L.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2016, 40 (01): : 192 - 201
  • [33] Pulmonary Rehabilitation in the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease among Asian Indians- Current Status and Moving Forward
    Bhadra, Rohini
    Bhattacharya, Shinjini
    D'Souza, George A.
    Schols, Annemie M. W. J.
    Sambashivaiah, Sucharita
    COPD-JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2021, 18 (04) : 476 - 481
  • [34] A brief history and current status of metal- and ceramic surface-conditioning concepts for resin bonding in dentistry
    Özcan, M
    Pfeiffer, P
    Nergiz, I
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 29 (11): : 713 - 724
  • [35] PROBLEMS WITH AUTHORITY - BRIEF-HISTORY AND CURRENT STATUS OF A PROBLEM LONG RELATED TO GROUPS DYNAMICS, BUT ACTUALLY RELEVANT TO EXISTENTIALISM
    SCHMIDT, J
    GRUPPENDYNAMIK-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANGEWANDTE SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 1990, 21 (04): : 373 - 392
  • [36] Cryopreserved hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells stability program-development, current status and recommendations: A brief report from the AABB-ISCT joint working group cellular therapy product stability project team
    Reich-Slotky, Ronit
    Vasovic, Ljiljana V.
    Land, Kevin J.
    Halpenny, Mike
    Woeltz, Joan
    Mathew, Aby J.
    Fournier, Diane
    Alder, Brenda
    Stasko, Karl
    Mahmud, Nadim
    TRANSFUSION, 2022, 62 (03) : 651 - 662
  • [37] Cryopreserved hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells stability program-development, current status and recommendations: A brief report from the AABB-ISCT joint working group cellular therapy product stability project team
    Reich-Slotky, Ronit
    Vasovic, Ljiljana V.
    Land, Kevin J.
    Halpenny, Mike
    Woeltz, Joan
    Mathew, Aby J.
    Fournier, Diane
    Alder, Brenda
    Stasko, Karl
    Mahmud, Nadim
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2022, 24 (05) : 473 - 481