Implementation strategies for large scale quality improvement initiatives in primary care settings: a qualitative assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Goldberg, Debora Goetz [1 ]
Owens-Jasey, Constance [1 ]
Haghighat, Sahar [2 ]
Kavalloor, Sneha [1 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Affiliate Fac, Ctr Evidence Based Behav Hlth, Dept Psychol,Dept Hlth Adm & Policy, 4400 Univ Dr MS IJ3, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Coll Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, 4400 Univ Dr 3G5, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
来源
BMC PRIMARY CARE | 2023年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Primary care; Quality improvement; Implementation; Evidence-based practice; qualitative research; LESSONS; HEALTH; INTERVIEWS; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-023-02200-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background and objectives The EvidenceNOW: Advancing Heart Health in Primary Care was designed to assist primary care practices in the US in implementing evidence-based practices in cardiovascular care and building capacity for quality improvement. EvidenceNOW, NCT03054090, was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 15/02/2017. The goals of this study were to gain a comprehensive understanding of perspectives from research participants and research team members on the value of implementation strategies and factors that influenced the Evidence NOW initiative in Virginia.Methods In 2018, we conducted 25 focus groups with clinicians and staff at participating practices, including 80 physicians, advanced practice clinicians, practice managers and other practice staff. We also conducted face-to-face and telephone interviews with 22 research team members, including lead investigators, practice facilitators, physician expert consultants, and evaluators. We used the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in the Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework in our qualitative data analysis and organization of themes.Results Implementation strategies valued by both practice representatives and research team members included the kick-off event, on-site practice facilitation, and interaction with physician expert consultants. Remote practice facilitation and web-based tools were used less frequently. Contextual factors that influence quality improvement efforts include leadership support, access to resources, previous quality improvement experience, and practice ownership type (independent compared to health system owned). Many clinicians and staff were overwhelmed by day-to-day activities and experience initiative fatigue, which hindered their ability to fully participate in the EvidenceNOW initiative.Conclusions This study provides details on how the practice environment plays an essential role in the implementation of evidence-based practices in primary care. Future efforts to improve quality in primary care practices should consider the context and environment of individual practices, with targeted implementation strategies to meet the needs of independent and health system owned practices. Future efforts to improve quality in primary care practices require strategies to address initiative fatigue among clinicians and practice staff. External support for building capacity for quality improvement could help primary care practices implement and sustain evidence-based practices and improve quality of care.Trial registrationThis project was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 15/02/2017 and the identifier is NCT03054090.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementation strategies for large scale quality improvement initiatives in primary care settings: a qualitative assessment
    Debora Goetz Goldberg
    Constance Owens-Jasey
    Sahar Haghighat
    Sneha Kavalloor
    [J]. BMC Primary Care, 24
  • [2] QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES FOR PATIENTS ON WARFARIN IN PRIMARY CARE
    Molony, S.
    O'Leary, A.
    Usher, C.
    Molony, D.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A541 - A541
  • [3] Strategies for large scale implementation of integrated care
    Nies, Henk
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2021, 21
  • [4] Clinical redesign strategies for multi-site implementation and quality improvement initiatives at a large academic healthcare system
    Li, Luming
    Sussrnan, Scott
    Branson, Brittany
    Davis, Melissa
    Amport, Stephanie
    Schwartz, Lan
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15
  • [5] A REVIEW OF ANTENATAL CARE INITIATIVES IN PRIMARY CARE SETTINGS
    WOOD, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1991, 41 (342): : 26 - 30
  • [6] Increasing Capacity for Quality Improvement in Underresourced Primary Care Settings
    Hudson, Shannon M.
    Hiott, Deanna B.
    Cole, Jeff
    Davis, Robert
    Egan, Brent M.
    Laken, Marilyn A.
    [J]. QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2014, 23 (03) : 155 - 162
  • [7] Engaging Patients in Primary Care Quality Improvement Initiatives: Facilitators and Barriers
    Pandhi, Nancy
    Jacobson, Nora
    Crowder, Madison
    Quanbeck, Andrew
    Hass, Mollie
    Davis, Sarah
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2020, 35 (01) : 52 - 62
  • [8] Informing implementation of quality improvement in Australian primary care
    Hespe, Charlotte
    Rychetnik, Lucie
    Peiris, David
    Harris, Mark
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [9] Informing implementation of quality improvement in Australian primary care
    Charlotte Hespe
    Lucie Rychetnik
    David Peiris
    Mark Harris
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [10] Quality Improvement/Quality of Care Center Initiatives
    Gingerich, Barbara Stover
    [J]. HOME HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2007, 19 (02): : 143 - 145