Informing implementation of quality improvement in Australian primary care

被引:29
|
作者
Hespe, Charlotte [1 ]
Rychetnik, Lucie [1 ]
Peiris, David [2 ]
Harris, Mark [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Level 2,160 Oxford St Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
[2] George Inst Global Hlth, Level 5,1 King St Newtown, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia
[3] UNSW Kensington, Ctr Primary Hlth Care & Equ, Level 3 AGSM, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
来源
关键词
Quality improvement; Primary care; Implementation; Leadership; Organisational culture; Data; Primary health care organisations; HEALTH-CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-018-3099-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Quality Improvement (QI) initiatives in primary care are effective at improving uptake of evidence based guidelines, but are difficult to implement and sustain. In Australia meso-level health organisations such as Primary health care Organisations (PHCO) offer new opportunities to implement area-wide QI programs. This study sought to identify enablers and barriers to implementation of an existing Australian QI program and to identify strategic directions that PHCOs can use in the ongoing development of QI in this environment. Methods: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 15 purposively selected program staff and participants from the Australian Primary Care Collaborative (APCC) QI program. Interviewees included seven people involved in design, administration and implementation of the APCC program and eight primary care providers (seven General Practitioners (GPs) and one practice nurse) who had participated in the program from 2004 to 2014. Interviewees were asked to describe their experience of the program and reflect on what enabled or impeded its implementation. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and iteratively analysed, with early analysis informing subsequent interviews. Identified themes and their implications were reviewed by a GP expert reference group. Results: Implementation enablers and barriers were grouped into five thematic areas: (1) leadership, particularly the identification and utilisation of change champions; (2) organisational culture that supports quality improvement; (3) funding incentives that support a culture of quality and innovation; (4) access to and use of accurate data; and 5) design and utilisation of clinical systems that enable and support these issues. In all of these areas, the active involvement of an overarching external support organisation was considered a key ingredient to successful implementation. Conclusion: There are substantial opportunities for PHCOs to play a pivotal role in QI implementation in Australia and internationally. In developing QI programs and policies, such organisations ought to invest their efforts in: (1) identifying and mentoring local leaders; (2) fostering QI culture via development of local peer networks; (3) developing and advocating for alternative funding models to support and incentivise these activities; (4) investing in data and audit tool infrastructure; and (5) facilitation of systems implementation within primary care practices.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Informing implementation of quality improvement in Australian primary care
    Charlotte Hespe
    Lucie Rychetnik
    David Peiris
    Mark Harris
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [2] The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care Agenda for Improvement and Implementation
    O'Rourke, M.
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2007, 2 (02): : 21 - 25
  • [3] Implementation and maintenance of quality improvement for treating depression in primary care
    Meredith, LS
    Mendel, P
    Pearson, M
    Wu, SY
    Joyce, G
    Straus, JB
    Ryan, G
    Keeler, E
    Unützer, J
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2006, 57 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [4] Effects of Practice Turnover on Primary Care Quality Improvement Implementation
    Baron, Andrea N.
    Hemler, Jennifer R.
    Sweeney, Shannon M.
    Woodson, Tanisha Tate
    Cuthel, Allison
    Crabtree, Benjamin F.
    Cohen, Deborah J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2020, 35 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [5] Improving primary care in Australia through the Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program: a quality improvement report
    Knight, Andrew W.
    Caesar, Claire
    Ford, Dale
    Coughlin, Alison
    Frick, Colin
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2012, 21 (11) : 948 - 955
  • [6] Quality improvement in primary care
    Checkland, Kath
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 380
  • [7] PRIMARY CARE TEAMS' PERCEPTIONS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF A REGIONAL HYPERTENSION QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
    Horwath, Gabriela
    Lewis, Steven
    Lever, Jonathan
    Ali-Matlock, Wanda
    Perzynski, Adam T.
    Bolen, Shari
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 : S306 - S306
  • [8] A Delphi study assessing the utility of quality improvement tools and resources in Australian primary care
    Upham, Susan J.
    Janamian, Tina
    Crossland, Lisa
    Jackson, Claire L.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2016, 204 (07) : S29 - S37
  • [9] Implementation of an improvement cycle in the care of a primary health care
    Nunes, Tainara Barbosa
    Resende de Souza, Ericka Cecilia
    da Silva Gama, Zenewton Andre
    Medeiros, Wilton Rodrigues
    Oliveira de Mendonca, Ana Elza
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2021, 74 (01)
  • [10] Implementation of the Health Care Homes model in Australian primary care
    Janamian, Tina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2019, 19