Laboratory and field evaluation of a low-cost optical particle sizer

被引:4
|
作者
Tang, Mingzhen [1 ]
Shen, Yicheng [1 ]
Ge, Yanzhen [3 ]
Gao, Jian [1 ]
Wang, Chong [2 ]
Wu, Liqing [1 ]
Si, Shuchun [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Grid Based Supervis Ctr Ecol & Environm Prot, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
[3] Taian Ecol Environm Protect Control Ctr, Tai An 271000, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Univ, Sch Phys, Jinan 250013, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Optical particle sizer; Particle size distribution; Low-cost sensor; Evaluation; Field application; PORTABLE AEROSOL SPECTROMETER; PARTICULATE MATTER SENSORS; NANOPARTICLES; EMISSIONS; HEALTH; PERFORMANCE; HUMIDITY; DENSITY; OPC-N2; DUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jes.2023.06.031
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Low-cost sensors are widely used to collect high-spatial-resolution particulate matter data that traditional reference monitoring devices cannot. In addition to the mass concentration, the number concentration and size distribution are also fundamental in determining the origin and hazard level of particulate pollution. Therefore, low-cost optical sensors have been improved to establish optical particle sizers (OPSs). In this study, a low-cost OPS, the Nova SDS029, is introduced, and it is evaluated in comparison to two reference instruments-the GRIMM 11-D and the TSI 3330. We first tested the sizing accuracy using polystyrene latex spheres. Then, we assessed the mass and number size distribution accuracy in three application scenarios: indoor smoking, ambient air quality, and mobile monitoring. The evaluations suggest that the low-cost SDS029 rivals research-grade optical sizers in many aspects. For example, (1) the particle diameters obtained with the SDS029 are close to the reference instruments (usually < 10%) in the 0.3-5 mu m range; (2) the number of particles and mass concentration are highly correlated ( r >= 0.99) with the values obtained with the reference instruments; and (3) the SDS029 slightly underestimates the number concentration, but the derived PM2.5 values are closer to monitoring station than the reference instruments. The successful application of the SDS029 in multiple scenarios suggests that a plausible particle size distribution can be obtained in an easy and cost-efficient way. We believe that low-cost OPSs will increasingly be used to map the sources and risk levels of particles at the city scale. (c) 2024 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 225
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laboratory and field evaluation of a low-cost optical particle sizer
    Mingzhen Tang
    Yicheng Shen
    Yanzhen Ge
    Jian Gao
    Chong Wang
    Liqing Wu
    Shuchun Si
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2024, (08) : 215 - 225
  • [2] Design and optimization of a compact low-cost optical particle sizer
    [J]. Novosselov, Igor (ivn@uw.edu), 1600, Elsevier Ltd (119):
  • [3] Design and optimization of a compact low-cost optical particle sizer
    Njalsson, Tomas
    Novosselov, Igor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2018, 119 : 1 - 12
  • [4] Evaluation of a low-cost dryer for a low-cost optical particle counter
    Chacon-Mateos, Miriam
    Laquai, Bernd
    Vogt, Ulrich
    Stubenrauch, Cosima
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2022, 15 (24) : 7395 - 7410
  • [5] Laboratory Evaluation of Low-Cost Optical Particle Counters for Environmental and Occupational Exposures
    Sousan, Sinan
    Regmi, Swastika
    Park, Yoo Min
    [J]. SENSORS, 2021, 21 (12)
  • [6] Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors
    Kuula, Joel
    Makela, Timo
    Aurela, Minna
    Teinila, Kimmo
    Varjonen, Samu
    Gonzalez, Oscar
    Timonen, Hilkka
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2020, 13 (05) : 2413 - 2423
  • [7] Laboratory and field evaluation of three low-cost particulate matter sensors
    Ghamari, Mohammad
    Soltanpur, Cinna
    Rangel, Pablo
    Groves, William A.
    Kecojevic, Vladislav
    [J]. IET WIRELESS SENSOR SYSTEMS, 2022, 12 (01) : 21 - 32
  • [8] EVALUATION OF LOW-COST OPTICAL PARTICLE COUNTERS FOR AGRICULTURAL EXPOSURE MEASUREMENTS
    Olegario, J. M.
    Regmi, S.
    Sousan, S.
    [J]. APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2021, 37 (01) : 113 - 122
  • [9] Optical Characterization Studies of a Low-Cost Particle Sensor
    Li, Jiayu
    Biswas, Pratim
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2017, 17 (07) : 1691 - 1704
  • [10] Aerosol Measurement Degradation in Low-Cost Particle Sensors Using Laboratory Calibration and Field Validation
    Peck, Angela
    Handy, Rodney G.
    Sleeth, Darrah K.
    Schaefer, Camie
    Zhang, Yue
    Pahler, Leon F.
    Ramsay, Joemy
    Collingwood, Scott C.
    [J]. TOXICS, 2023, 11 (01)