Scaled Model Tests Investigating Deformation Characteristics of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Abutments under Vertical Loads

被引:1
|
作者
Xu, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Qingming [1 ]
Shen, Panpan [2 ]
Li, Geye [1 ]
Wang, Qiushen [1 ]
Zhang, Xiao [1 ]
Zhao, Chongxi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Invest Design & Res Inst Co Ltd, Shanghai 200434, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
abutment; deformation; geosynthetics; geosynthetic reinforced soil; volumetric deformation; PERFORMANCE; IBS; WALLS;
D O I
10.3390/ma16134601
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study conducted plane-strain scaled model tests to investigate the deformation characteristics of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) abutments subjected to vertical loads. Setback distance, i.e., the distance between the back of the abutment facing and the front of the loading plate, was chosen as the investigated influencing factor since it is one of the most frequently used variables by engineers for the design of GRS abutments. This study analyzed the settlements at the top of the abutment, the lateral displacements of the abutment facing, and the volumetric deformations of the abutment under the applied vertical loads. Test results showed that increasing the setback distance could effectively reduce the deformations of the GRS abutment. There existed an optimum setback distance and further increasing the setback distance beyond this optimum value did not have a significant effect on reducing the abutment deformations. The vertical, lateral, and total volumetric deformations of the GRS abutment showed an approximately linear increase with the increase of the applied vertical loads. The lateral volumetric deformations of the GRS abutment were larger than its vertical volumetric deformations and therefore the total volumetric strains of the GRS abutment were not zero based on the test results. However, the theory of zero volume change may still be suitable for the deformation calculation of the GRS abutment since the values of the volumetric strains were minimal. The measured maximum lateral facing displacements were compared with the calculated values using the US Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) method, which assumes zero volume change of the GRS abutment under vertical loads. Comparison results indicated that the FHWA method overestimated the maximum lateral facing displacements of the GRS abutment under vertical loads. An improved method was proposed in this study to calculate the maximum lateral facing displacements under vertical loads based on the theory of zero volume change and a revised distribution of the settlements at the top of the GRS abutment. Results showed that the improved method could better predict the maximum lateral facing displacements as compared to the FHWA method.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations
    Adams, MT
    Collin, JG
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 123 (01) : 66 - 72
  • [32] Ultimate bearing capacity of geosynthetic reinforced soil abutment centrifuge model tests
    Zhao, C.
    Xu, C.
    Yang, Y.
    Wang, Q.
    Du, C.
    Li, G.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 31 (06) : 1063 - 1076
  • [33] Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations
    Yetimoglu, T
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 124 (11) : 1157 - 1158
  • [34] An analytical model for calculating lateral movement of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) wall with modular block facing
    Wu, Jonathan T. H.
    Thang Q. Pham
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 4 (04) : 527 - 535
  • [35] Prediction of deformation of retaining walls of geosynthetic-reinforced soil under large earthquakes
    Fujii, T.
    Izawa, J.
    Kuwano, J.
    Ishihara, M.
    Nakane, A.
    Geosynthetics, Vols 1-4, 2006, : 1485 - 1488
  • [36] Reinforcement loads of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls under horizontal earthquake loading
    Liu, Hua-Bei
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44 (02): : 288 - 294
  • [37] Scaled model tests on influence factors of full geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments
    Xu, C.
    Song, S.
    Han, J.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 23 (02) : 140 - 153
  • [38] Scaled Model Tests on the Influence of Reinforcement Spacing on the Deformation of Reinforced Retaining Wall
    Wu, Di
    Wu, Jianjian
    Li, Qian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016, 72 : 516 - 520
  • [39] Experimental Study on Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Dynamic Characteristics under Cyclic Loading
    Shi, Wei
    Hu, Ruigeng
    Zhang, Longlong
    Pan, Yue
    ADVANCES OF TRANSPORTATION: INFRASTRUCTURE AND MATERIALS, VOL 2, 2016, : 832 - 838
  • [40] Dynamic Characteristics Study of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil under Cyclic Loading
    Shi, Wei
    Lu, Tao
    Zhang, Longlong
    Pan, Yue
    GEO-CHINA 2016: BEHAVIOR OF GEOMATERIALS AND FOUNDATIONS FOR CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE APPLICATIONS, 2016, (269): : 210 - 216