Scaled Model Tests Investigating Deformation Characteristics of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Abutments under Vertical Loads

被引:1
|
作者
Xu, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Qingming [1 ]
Shen, Panpan [2 ]
Li, Geye [1 ]
Wang, Qiushen [1 ]
Zhang, Xiao [1 ]
Zhao, Chongxi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Invest Design & Res Inst Co Ltd, Shanghai 200434, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
abutment; deformation; geosynthetics; geosynthetic reinforced soil; volumetric deformation; PERFORMANCE; IBS; WALLS;
D O I
10.3390/ma16134601
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study conducted plane-strain scaled model tests to investigate the deformation characteristics of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) abutments subjected to vertical loads. Setback distance, i.e., the distance between the back of the abutment facing and the front of the loading plate, was chosen as the investigated influencing factor since it is one of the most frequently used variables by engineers for the design of GRS abutments. This study analyzed the settlements at the top of the abutment, the lateral displacements of the abutment facing, and the volumetric deformations of the abutment under the applied vertical loads. Test results showed that increasing the setback distance could effectively reduce the deformations of the GRS abutment. There existed an optimum setback distance and further increasing the setback distance beyond this optimum value did not have a significant effect on reducing the abutment deformations. The vertical, lateral, and total volumetric deformations of the GRS abutment showed an approximately linear increase with the increase of the applied vertical loads. The lateral volumetric deformations of the GRS abutment were larger than its vertical volumetric deformations and therefore the total volumetric strains of the GRS abutment were not zero based on the test results. However, the theory of zero volume change may still be suitable for the deformation calculation of the GRS abutment since the values of the volumetric strains were minimal. The measured maximum lateral facing displacements were compared with the calculated values using the US Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) method, which assumes zero volume change of the GRS abutment under vertical loads. Comparison results indicated that the FHWA method overestimated the maximum lateral facing displacements of the GRS abutment under vertical loads. An improved method was proposed in this study to calculate the maximum lateral facing displacements under vertical loads based on the theory of zero volume change and a revised distribution of the settlements at the top of the GRS abutment. Results showed that the improved method could better predict the maximum lateral facing displacements as compared to the FHWA method.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experimental and theoretical studies on deformation characteristics of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil (GRS) abutments induced by vertical loads
    Wang, Qingming
    Xu, Chao
    Shen, Panpan
    Li, Geye
    Zhao, Chongxi
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2024, 52 (05) : 925 - 940
  • [2] Responses of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) abutments under bridge slab loading: Numerical investigation
    Shen, Panpan
    Han, Jie
    Zornberg, Jorge G.
    Tanyu, Burak F.
    Christopher, Barry R.
    Leshchinsky, Dov
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2020, 123
  • [3] Required minimum reinforcement stiffness and strength in geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls and abutments
    Wu, Jonathan T. H.
    Ma, Christina Y.
    Pham, Thang Q.
    Adams, Michael T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 5 (04) : 395 - 404
  • [4] Scaled model tests of soil arching effect in geosynthetic reinforced and pile supported embankments
    Xu, Chao
    Song, Shitong
    Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34 : 4343 - 4350
  • [5] Numerical Simulation of Deformation and Failure Behavior of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutments
    Zheng, Yewei
    Fox, Patrick J.
    McCartney, John S.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 144 (07)
  • [6] Centrifuge model tests on vertical stress distribution of geosynthetics reinforced soil (GRS) abutment
    Wang, Qingming
    Xu, Chao
    Shen, Panpan
    Li, Geye
    Zhao, Chongxi
    Meng, Ya
    GEOSHANGHAI 2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, VOL 6, 2024, 1335
  • [7] Seismic Behavior of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil (GRS) Bridge Abutments with Concrete Block Facing—an Analytical Study
    Ghaderi R.
    Helwany S.
    Wu J.T.H.
    Meinholz P.
    Alizadeh V.
    Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 2017, 4 (2-3) : 52 - 83
  • [8] 3D Deformation Behavior of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutments
    Rong, Wenyong
    Zheng, Yewei
    McCartney, John S.
    Fox, Patrick J.
    GEOTECHNICAL FRONTIERS 2017: WALLS AND SLOPES, 2017, (278): : 44 - 53
  • [9] Deformations of geosynthetic reinforced soil under bridge service loads
    Nicks, Jennifer E.
    Esmaili, Danial
    Adams, Michael T.
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2016, 44 (04) : 641 - 653
  • [10] Physical Model Tests of Half-Scale Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutments. II: Dynamic Loading
    Zheng, Yewei
    McCartney, John S.
    Shing, P. Benson
    Fox, Patrick J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 145 (11)