Multicenter Reproducibility of Liver Iron Quantification with 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI

被引:19
|
作者
Hernando, Diego [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Ruiyang [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, Qing [9 ]
Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari [11 ]
Ruschke, Stefan
Miao, Xinran [3 ]
Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
Mao, Lu [4 ]
Harris, David T. [1 ]
Mattison, Ryan J. [5 ]
Jeng, Michael R.
Pedrosa, Ivan [9 ,10 ]
Kamel, Ihab R. [11 ]
Vasanawala, Shreyas
Yokoo, Takeshi [9 ,10 ]
Reeder, Scott B. [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Radiol, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Med Phys, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Stat, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Med, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Biomed Engn, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Med, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[8] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Emergency Med, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[9] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX USA
[10] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Adv Imaging Res Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[11] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SICKLE-CELL-DISEASE; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; OVERLOAD; BIOPSY; FAT; R2-ASTERISK-RELAXOMETRY; THALASSEMIA; STORES;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.213256
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: MRI is a standard of care tool to measure liver iron concentration (LIC). Compared with regulatory-approved R2 MRI, R2* MRI has superior speed and is available in most MRI scanners; however, the cross-vendor reproducibility of R2*-based LIC estimation remains unknown.Purpose: To evaluate the reproducibility of LIC via single-breath-hold R2* MRI at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T with use of a multicenter, multivendor study.Materials and Methods: Four academic medical centers using MRI scanners from three different vendors (three 1.5-T scanners, one 2.89-T scanner, and two 3.0-T scanners) participated in this prospective cross-sectional study. Participants with known or suspected liver iron overload were recruited to undergo multiecho gradient-echo MRI for R2* mapping at 1.5 T and 3.0 T (2.89 T or 3.0 T) on the same day. R2* maps were reconstructed from the multiecho images and analyzed at a single center. Reference LIC measure-ments were obtained with a commercial R2 MRI method performed using standardized 1.5-T spin-echo imaging. R2*-versus-LIC calibrations were generated across centers and field strengths using linear regression and compared using F tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the diagnostic performance of R2* MRI in the detection of clinically relevant LIC thresholds.Results: A total of 207 participants (mean age, 38 years +/- 20 [SD]; 117 male participants) were evaluated between March 2015 and September 2019. A linear relationship was confirmed between R2* and LIC. All calibrations within the same field strength were highly reproducible, showing no evidence of statistically significant center-specific differences (P > .43 across all comparisons). Calibrations for 1.5 T and 3.0 T were generated, as follows: for 1.5 T, LIC (in milligrams per gram [dry weight]) = -0.16 + 2.603 x 10-2 R2* (in seconds-1); for 2.89 T, LIC (in milligrams per gram) = -0.03 + 1.400 x 10-2 R2* (in seconds-1); for 3.0 T, LIC (in mil-ligrams per gram) = -0.03 + 1.349 x 10-2R2* (in seconds-1). Liver R2* had high diagnostic performance in the detection of clini-cally relevant LIC thresholds (area under the ROC curve, >0.98).Conclusion: R2* MRI enabled accurate and reproducible quantification of liver iron overload over clinically relevant ranges of liver iron concentration (LIC). The data generated in this study provide the necessary calibrations for broad clinical dissemination of R2*-based LIC quantification.ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT02025543 (c) RSNA, 2022
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection of hepatic metastases by superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging: prospective comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T images in the same patients
    Keitaro Sofue
    Masakatsu Tsurusaki
    Mototaka Miyake
    Aine Sakurada
    Yasuaki Arai
    Kazuro Sugimura
    European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 2265 - 2273
  • [32] Detection of hepatic metastases by superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging: prospective comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T images in the same patients
    Sofue, Keitaro
    Tsurusaki, Masakatsu
    Miyake, Mototaka
    Sakurada, Aine
    Arai, Yasuaki
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (09) : 2265 - 2273
  • [33] Interindividual reproducibility of glutamate quantification using 1.5-T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy
    Jang, DP
    Lee, JM
    Lee, E
    Park, S
    Kim, JJ
    Namkoong, K
    Yoon, KJ
    Kim, IY
    Kim, SI
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2005, 53 (03) : 708 - 712
  • [34] 3.0-T MRI evaluation of patients with chronic liver diseases: initial observations
    Zapparoli, Mauricio
    Semelka, Richard C.
    Altun, Ersan
    Tsurusaki, Masakatsu
    Pamuklar, Ertan
    Dale, Brian M.
    Gasparctto, Emerson L.
    Elias, Jorge, Jr.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 26 (05) : 650 - 660
  • [35] The Feasibility of a Fast Liver MRI Protocol for Lesion Detection of Adults at 3.0-T
    Li, Jing
    Ma, Chao
    Chen, Yukun
    Fu, Caixia
    Wang, Xinrui
    Kuehn, Bernd
    Yang, Qingsong
    Lu, Jianping
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [36] Is Dedicated Extremity 1.5-T MRI Equivalent to Standard Large-Bore 1.5-T MRI for Foot and Knee Examinations?
    Sutter, Reto
    Tresch, Florian
    Buck, Florian M.
    Pfirrmann, Christian W. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (06) : 1293 - 1302
  • [37] Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Kim, Bohyun
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Kwon, Ghee Young
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (04) : 534 - 538
  • [38] Development of MRI phantom equivalent to human tissues for 3.0-T MRI
    Hattori, Kengo
    Ikemoto, Yusuke
    Takao, Wataru
    Ohno, Seiichiro
    Harimoto, Takashi
    Kanazawa, Susumu
    Oita, Masataka
    Shibuya, Koichi
    Kuroda, Masahiro
    Kato, Hirokazu
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (03)
  • [39] Sensitivity of a 1.5-T MRI system for electromagnetic fields
    Harberts, Dick W.
    van Helvoort, Mark
    2014 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (EMC EUROPE), 2014, : 856 - 859
  • [40] 1.5-T MRI, CT, ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND SCINTIGRAPHY IN HYPERPARATHYROIDISM
    VONSCHULTHESS, GK
    WEDER, W
    GOEBEL, N
    BUCHMANN, P
    GADZE, A
    AUGUSTINY, N
    LARGIADER, F
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1988, 8 (03) : 157 - 164