Plant physiological indicators for optimizing conservation outcomes

被引:8
|
作者
Schonbeck, Leonie [1 ]
Arteaga, Marc [1 ]
Mirza, Humera [1 ]
Coleman, Mitchell [1 ,2 ]
Mitchell, Denise [1 ]
Huang, Xinyi [1 ]
Ortiz, Haile [1 ]
Santiago, Louis S. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Bot & Plant Sci, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Tejon Ranch Conservancy, Frazier Pk, CA 93225 USA
[3] Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, Apartado 0843 03092, Panama City, Panama
[4] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Bot & Plant Sci, 2150 Batchelor Hall, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
来源
CONSERVATION PHYSIOLOGY | 2023年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
Drought; photosynthesis; plant eco-physiology; nutrients; temperature; plant hydraulics; TURGOR LOSS POINT; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; TEMPERATURE RESPONSE; WATER RELATIONS; NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; INDUCED TREE; CLIMATE; TRAITS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS;
D O I
10.1093/conphys/coad073
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Plant physiology can determine the health status of plant species of concern. However, many physiological measurements gain increased context when measured with a reference point that represents the optimal performance and the capacity to withstand stress. Here, we discuss the best practices for plant physiological status and reference point measurements in conservation biology. Plant species of concern often occupy narrow habitat ranges, making climate change an outsized potential threat to their conservation and restoration. Understanding the physiological status of a species during stress has the potential to elucidate current risk and provide an outlook on population maintenance. However, the physiological status of a plant can be difficult to interpret without a reference point, such as the capacity to tolerate stress before loss of function, or mortality. We address the application of plant physiology to conservation biology by distinguishing between two physiological approaches that together determine plant status in relation to environmental conditions and evaluate the capacity to avoid stress-induced loss of function. Plant physiological status indices, such as instantaneous rates of photosynthetic gas exchange, describe the level of physiological activity in the plant and are indicative of physiological health. When such measurements are combined with a reference point that reflects the maximum value or environmental limits of a parameter, such as the temperature at which photosynthesis begins to decline due to high temperature stress, we can better diagnose the proximity to potentially damaging thresholds. Here, we review a collection of useful plant status and reference point measurements related to photosynthesis, water relations and mineral nutrition, which can contribute to plant conservation physiology. We propose that these measurements can serve as important additional information to more commonly used phenological and morphological parameters, as the proposed parameters will reveal early warning signals before they are visible. We discuss their implications in the context of changing temperature, water and nutrient supply.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimizing perioperative outcomes
    Fleisher, LA
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 96 (03): : 29 - 32
  • [42] Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation
    Balding, Mung
    Williams, Kathryn J. H.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2016, 30 (06) : 1192 - 1199
  • [43] Optimizing cystectomy outcomes
    Porten, Sima P.
    Master, Viraj A.
    CANCER, 2019, 125 (20) : 3502 - 3503
  • [44] Indicators of (patho)physiological processes - Preface
    Deyl, Z
    Tagliaro, F
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2002, 781 (1-2): : 1 - 1
  • [45] Genetically encoded physiological indicators.
    Tsien, RY
    Miyawaki, A
    Zacharias, DA
    Lev-Ram, V
    Llopis, J
    Cho, CY
    Adams, SR
    Baird, GS
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 78 (01) : 1A - 1A
  • [46] VISIBLE INDICATORS OF PHYSIOLOGICAL MATURITY IN BARLEY
    COPELAND, PJ
    CROOKSTON, RK
    CROP SCIENCE, 1985, 25 (05) : 843 - 847
  • [47] Physiological and Behavioral Indicators of School Anxiety
    Tarasova, S. Yu
    Osnitsky, A. K.
    PSIKHOLOGICHESKAYA NAUKA I OBRAZOVANIE-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION, 2015, 20 (01): : 59 - 68
  • [48] RESPONSES OF PHYSIOLOGICAL INDICATORS TO A SOCCER MATCH
    Bezerra, Jader de Andrade
    Farias, Nemeia de Oliveira
    Alves Melo, Sandro Victor
    Martins Silva, Romeu Paulo
    Melo de Castro, Antonio Clodoaldo
    Bastos Martins, Faber Sergio
    Rodrigues dos Santos, Jose Augusto
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA DO ESPORTE, 2016, 22 (03) : 200 - 205
  • [49] NETWORK ANALYSIS OF PHYSIOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF STRESS
    Hazlett, Laura
    West, Samuel
    Thomson, Nicholas
    Roberson-Nay, Roxann
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 59 : S163 - S163
  • [50] OUTCOMES, IMPACTS, AND INDICATORS
    Becker, Samantha
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2015, 140 (15) : 26 - 30