The Influence of Screw Positioning on Cage Subsidence in Patients with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Anterolateral Fixation

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiandi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zhuhai [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Xie, Tianhang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Lihang [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Chuan [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Huang, Shishu [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Zeng, Jiancheng [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Orthopaed Res Inst, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Peoples Hosp Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Reg, Dept Spine Surg, Nanning, Peoples R China
[5] Guizhou Prov Orthoped Hosp, Dept Spine Surg, Guiyang, Peoples R China
[6] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Med, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cage Subsidence; Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion; Screw Position; Screw Trajectory; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1111/os.13882
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Cage subsidence (CS) has been reported to be one of the most common complications following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). To reduce the incidence of CS and improve intervertebral fusion rates, anterolateral fixation (AF) has been gradually proposed. However, the incidence of CS in patients with oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation (OLIF-AF) is still controversial. Additionally, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal placement of screws for OLIF-AF, and the impact of screw placement on the incidence of CS has yet to be thoroughly investigated and validated. The objective of this investigation was to examine the correlation between screw placements and CS and to establish an optimized approach for implantation in OLIF-AF.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken. From October 2017 to December 2020, a total of 103 patients who received L4/5 OLIF-AF for lumbar spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis or degenerative instability in our department were followed up for more than 12 months. Demographic and radiographic data of these patients were collected. Additionally, screw placement related parameters, including trajectory and position, were measured by anterior-posterior X-ray and axial CT. Analysis was done by chi-square, independent t-test, univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression to explore the correlation between screw placements and CS. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive ability of screw placement-related parameters.Results: A total of 103 patients were included, and CS was found in 28 (27.18%) patients. Univariable analysis was firstly performed for each parameter. Next, variables with p-value of <0.05, including bone mineral density (BMD), concave morphology, and screw placement-related parameters were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Significant predictor factors for subsidence were coronal plane angle (CPA) (OR 0.580 +/- 0.208, 95% CI 1.187-2.684), implantation point (IP) (L4) (OR 5.732 +/- 2.737, 95% CI 1.445-12.166), and IP (L5) (OR 7.160 +/- 3.480, 95% CI 1.405-28.683). Furthermore, ROC curves showed that the predictive accuracy of CS was 88.1% for CPA, 77.6% for IP (L4) and 80.9% for IP (L5).Conclusions: We demonstrate that the trajectory of vertebral screws, including angle and position, was closely related to CS. Inserting screws parallel to each other and as close to the endplate as possible while keeping the cage inside the range of the superior and inferior screws are an optimal implantation strategy for OLIF-AF.
引用
收藏
页码:3263 / 3271
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Combined anterior interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw fixation in patients with degenerative lumbar disc disease
    M. A. El Masry
    W. S. Badawy
    P. Rajendran
    D Chan
    International Orthopaedics, 2004, 28 : 294 - 297
  • [42] Cage Subsidence and Fusion Rate in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion with and without Fixation
    Chen, Enliang
    Xu, Junjie
    Yang, Shanzhi
    Zhang, Qingshun
    Yi, Honglei
    Liang, Daxuan
    Lan, Sibin
    Duan, Mingyang
    Wu, Zenghui
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 : E969 - E977
  • [43] Low Hounsfield units on computed tomography are associated with cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF)
    Ran, Liyu
    Xie, Tianhang
    Zhao, Long
    Huang, Shishu
    Zeng, Jiancheng
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (06): : 957 - 964
  • [44] Effect of pedicle-screw rod fixation on oblique lumbar interbody fusion in patients with osteoporosis: a retrospective cohort study
    Cai, Kaiwen
    Luo, Kefeng
    Zhu, Jinjin
    Zhang, Kai
    Yu, Shengkai
    Ye, Yi
    Jiang, Guoqiang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (01) : 429
  • [45] Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence Following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
    Shen, Shufeng
    You, Xinmao
    Ren, Yingqing
    Ye, Senqi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 183 : 180 - 186
  • [46] Effect of pedicle-screw rod fixation on oblique lumbar interbody fusion in patients with osteoporosis: a retrospective cohort study
    Kaiwen Cai
    Kefeng Luo
    Jinjin Zhu
    Kai Zhang
    Shengkai Yu
    Yi Ye
    Guoqiang Jiang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 16
  • [47] Subsidence of Interbody Cage Following Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion: An Analysis and Potential Risk Factors
    Kotheeranurak, Vit
    Jitpakdee, Khanathip
    Lin, Guang-Xun
    Mahatthanatrakul, Akaworn
    Singhatanadgige, Weerasak
    Limthongkul, Worawat
    Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (07) : 1981 - 1991
  • [48] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation - a finite element analysis
    Kyung-Chul Choi
    Kyeong-Sik Ryu
    Sang-Ho Lee
    Yeong Hyeon Kim
    Sung Jae Lee
    Chun-Kun Park
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14
  • [49] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation - a finite element analysis
    Choi, Kyung-Chul
    Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    Kim, Yeong Hyeon
    Lee, Sung Jae
    Park, Chun-Kun
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
  • [50] Evaluation of uni- and bilateral pedicle screw fixation of the spine with posterior oblique lumbar interbody fusion
    Hacker, RJ
    Jensen, LM
    Bakker, S
    Dawson, JM
    Griffith, SL
    NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 53 (02) : 497 - 497