Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopy

被引:0
|
作者
Ulutas, Hafize Gokben [1 ]
Ozkaya, Guven [2 ]
Hamidi, Nagihan Amuk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Yuksek Ihtisas Training & Res Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Bursa, Turkiye
[2] Bursa Uludag Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, Bursa, Turkiye
关键词
Central corneal thickness; Sirius topography; Optic coherence tomography; Specular microscopy; Ultrasonic pachymetry; SCHEIMPFLUG CAMERA; AGREEMENT; PENTACAM; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103527
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study aims to investigate the compatibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), Scheimpflug-Placido-based corneal topography (CT), non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM), and ultrasonic pachymetry (UP). These four corneal measurement techniques have not been compared in a single study on these many subjects. Methods: CCT was measured in 185 eyes of 185 volunteers with each of the four devices by a single observer. CCTs from Optovue (R) iVue SD-OCT, Sirius corneal topography, NonconRobo NCSM, and Accutom UP devices were recorded. Compatibility between devices was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Pairwise comparisons were performed using the Bonferroni test. Measurement differences between devices were analyzed with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: Of the 185 volunteers, 103 were men, and 82 were women. Their mean age was 48.55 +/- 16.6 (18-70) years. Mean CCT values measured by UP, CT, OCT, and NCSM were 546.77 +/- 39.2, 535.29 +/- 39.2, 526.49 +/- 39.05, 505.15 +/- 46.1 mu m, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the mean CCT values obtained from the paired devices (p <0.001). The highest difference between pairs was found between UP and NCSM (43.63 +/- 1.8 mu m; CI 38.74 to 48.5 mu m; p <0.001), while the lowest difference was found between OCT and CT (7.3 +/- 1.5 mu m; 95%CI 3.1 to 11.6 mu m; p <0.001). In pairwise comparisons of four devices, the highest ICC value was between UP and CT (ICC: 0.899, 95%CI 0.759-0.947; p <0.001). Conclusion: Despite the high correlation between measurements obtained from different methods, notable differences in CCT values exist, rendering devices non-interchangeable. Therefore, alternative brands of the same device may yield different outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Pentacam Scheimpflug camera with ultrasound pachymetry and 0 noncontact specular Microscopy in measuring central corneal thickness
    Fujioka, Miyuki
    Nakamura, Makoto
    Tatsumi, Yasuko
    Kusuhara, Azusa
    Maeda, Hidetaka
    Negi, Akira
    [J]. CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2007, 32 (02) : 89 - 94
  • [32] Comparison of ultrasound pachymetry and partial coherence interferometry in the measurement of central corneal thickness
    Rainer, G
    Petternel, V
    Findl, O
    Schmetterer, L
    Skorpik, C
    Luksch, A
    Drexler, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (12): : 2142 - 2145
  • [33] Comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for measurement of corneal thickness in dogs with and without corneal disease
    Hoehn, A. L.
    Thomasy, S. M.
    Kass, P. H.
    Horikawa, T.
    Samuel, M.
    Shull, O. R.
    Stewart, K. A.
    Murphy, C. J.
    [J]. VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2018, 242 : 59 - 66
  • [34] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry, Konan noncontact optical pachymetry, and Orbscan pachymetry
    Christensen, Amarilda
    Narvaez, Julio
    Zimmerman, Grenith
    [J]. CORNEA, 2008, 27 (08) : 862 - 865
  • [35] Comparison of Non-contact Specular and Confocal Microscopy for the Evaluation of the Corneal Endothelium
    Huang, Jianyan
    Maram, Jyotsna
    Modak, Cristina
    Sadda, Srinivas R.
    Chopra, Vikas
    Lee, Olivia L.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [36] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, Visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, Cirrus optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam Scheimpflug camera tomography
    Wongchaisuwat, Nida
    Metheetrairat, Ankana
    Chonpimai, Pratuangsri
    Nujoi, Waree
    Prabhasawat, Pinnita
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 12 : 1865 - 1873
  • [37] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry, Orbscan, and third generation optical coherence tomography (OCT3)
    Fishman, GR
    Pons, M
    Makornwattana, M
    Seedor, J
    Liebmann, J
    Ritch, R
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U5 - U5
  • [38] Central Corneal Thickness Measurement with Online Optical Coherence Pachymetry and Ultrasound Pachymetry in 513 Consecutive Eyes
    von Jagow, B.
    Kuehne, C.
    Kohnen, T.
    [J]. KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2009, 226 (08) : 645 - 648
  • [39] Comparison of central corneal thickness using optical low-coherence reflectometry and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
    Lopez-Miguel, Alberto
    Encarnacion Correa-Perez, Maria
    Miranda-Anta, Silvia
    Iglesias-Cortinas, Dario
    Begona Coco-Martin, Maria
    Maldonado, Miguel J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 38 (05): : 758 - 764
  • [40] Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by automatic and manual analysis of optical coherence tomography
    Carlo Bruttini
    Roberto Esposti
    Alfredo Pece
    Giulio Maione
    Paolo Cavallari
    [J]. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2024, 262 : 1857 - 1863