Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopy

被引:0
|
作者
Ulutas, Hafize Gokben [1 ]
Ozkaya, Guven [2 ]
Hamidi, Nagihan Amuk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Yuksek Ihtisas Training & Res Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Bursa, Turkiye
[2] Bursa Uludag Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, Bursa, Turkiye
关键词
Central corneal thickness; Sirius topography; Optic coherence tomography; Specular microscopy; Ultrasonic pachymetry; SCHEIMPFLUG CAMERA; AGREEMENT; PENTACAM; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103527
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study aims to investigate the compatibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), Scheimpflug-Placido-based corneal topography (CT), non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM), and ultrasonic pachymetry (UP). These four corneal measurement techniques have not been compared in a single study on these many subjects. Methods: CCT was measured in 185 eyes of 185 volunteers with each of the four devices by a single observer. CCTs from Optovue (R) iVue SD-OCT, Sirius corneal topography, NonconRobo NCSM, and Accutom UP devices were recorded. Compatibility between devices was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Pairwise comparisons were performed using the Bonferroni test. Measurement differences between devices were analyzed with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: Of the 185 volunteers, 103 were men, and 82 were women. Their mean age was 48.55 +/- 16.6 (18-70) years. Mean CCT values measured by UP, CT, OCT, and NCSM were 546.77 +/- 39.2, 535.29 +/- 39.2, 526.49 +/- 39.05, 505.15 +/- 46.1 mu m, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the mean CCT values obtained from the paired devices (p <0.001). The highest difference between pairs was found between UP and NCSM (43.63 +/- 1.8 mu m; CI 38.74 to 48.5 mu m; p <0.001), while the lowest difference was found between OCT and CT (7.3 +/- 1.5 mu m; 95%CI 3.1 to 11.6 mu m; p <0.001). In pairwise comparisons of four devices, the highest ICC value was between UP and CT (ICC: 0.899, 95%CI 0.759-0.947; p <0.001). Conclusion: Despite the high correlation between measurements obtained from different methods, notable differences in CCT values exist, rendering devices non-interchangeable. Therefore, alternative brands of the same device may yield different outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
    Erdur, Sevil Karaman
    Demirci, Goktug
    Dikkaya, Funda
    Kocabora, Mehmet Selim
    Ozsutcu, Mustafa
    [J]. SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 33 (06) : 782 - 787
  • [2] Comparison of central corneal thickness as measured by non-contact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and post LASIK
    Zhao, Ming-Hui
    Zou, Jun
    Wang, Wen-Qing
    Li, Jun
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 35 (09): : 818 - 823
  • [3] Comparison of central corneal thickness in corneal edema by ultrasound pachymetry, specular microscopy, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography
    Artuc, Tuncay
    Batur, Muhammed
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 37 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [4] Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography
    Gonzalez-Perez, Javier
    Queiruga Pineiro, Juan
    Sanchez Garcia, Angelx
    Gonzalez Meijome, Jose Manuel
    [J]. CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2018, 43 (07) : 866 - 872
  • [5] Comparison of Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasonic Pachymetry for Assessment of Central Corneal Thickness
    Celebi, Ali Riza Cenk
    Mirza, G. Ertugrul
    [J]. TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 44 (04): : 259 - 262
  • [6] Comparison of central corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry versus slit-lamp optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Orbscan
    Khaja, Wassia A.
    Grover, Sandeep
    Kelmenson, Amy T.
    Ferguson, Lee R.
    Sambhav, Kumar
    Chalam, Kakarla V.
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 9 : 1065 - 1070
  • [7] Assessment of central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial morphology using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy, and Confoscan 4 confocal microscopy
    Al Farhan, Haya Matuoq
    Al Otaibi, Wafa'a Majed
    Al Razqan, Hanouf Mohammed
    Al Harqan, Alanoud Abdullah
    [J]. BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [8] Assessment of central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial morphology using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy, and Confoscan 4 confocal microscopy
    Haya Matuoq Al Farhan
    Wafa’a Majed Al Otaibi
    Hanouf Mohammed Al Razqan
    Alanoud Abdullah Al Harqan
    [J]. BMC Ophthalmology, 13
  • [9] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by specular microscopy, ultrasound pachymetry, and ultrasound biomicroscopy
    Tam, ES
    Rootman, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (06): : 1179 - 1184
  • [10] Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry and optical coherence tomography
    Leung, Dexter Y. L.
    Lam, Douglas K. T.
    Yeung, Barry Y. M.
    Lam, Dennis S. C.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 34 (08): : 751 - 754